Experimental plan for single, double and triple hybrid corn

Maydica

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 27-32

  Storck, L ^a   Filho, A Cargnelutti ^a   Lopes, S J ^a   Toebe, M ^a   Da Silveira, T Reis ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Number of uniformity trials; Optimal plot size; Resampling; Visual jackknife; Zea mays L.

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77957990341     PISSN: 00256153     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. AYRES M., M. JR. AYRES, D. L. AYRES, A. A. S. SANTOS, 2007 BioEstat - Aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências bio-médicas. URL. Accessed on 23 February 2010.
2. CONFALONIERI R., D. STROPPIANA, M. BOSCHETTI, D. GUSBERTI, S. BOCCHI, M. ACUTIS, 2006 Analysis of rice sample size variability due to development stage, nitrogen fertilization, sowing technique and variety using the visual jackknife. Field Crops Res. 97:135-141.
3. CONFALONIERI R., M. ACUTIS, G. BELLOCCHI, G. GENOVESE, 2007 Resampling-based software for estimating optimal sample size. Environ. Modeling & Software 22:1796-1800.
4. CONFALONIERI R., A. PEREGO, M. E. CHIODINI, B. SCAGLIA, A. S. ROSENMUND, M. ACUTIS, 2009 Analysis of sample size for variables related to plant, soil, and soil microbial respiration in a paddy rice field. Field Crops Res. 113:125-130.
5. FERREIRA D. F., 2005 Estatística básica. Lavras: Editora UFLA, 664 p.
6. FERREIRA P. V., 2000 Estatística experimental aplicada à agronomia. 3.ed. Maceió: EDUFAL, 422 p.
7. nd edition. New York: John Wiley, 680 p.
8. HATHEWAY W. H., 1961 Convenient plot size. Agronomy J. 53:279-280.
9. HATHEWAY W. H., E. J. WILLIAMS, 1958 Efficient estimation of the relationship between plot size and the variability of crop yields. Biometrics 14:207-222.
10. KOCH E. J., J. A. RIGNEY, 1951 A method of estimating optimum plot size from experimental data. Agronomy J. 43:17-21.
11. LIN C. S., M. R. BINNS, 1986 Relative efficiency of two randomized block designs having different plot size and numbers of replications and of plots per block. Agronomy J. 78:531-534.
12. LIN C. S., M. R. BINNS, 1984 Working rules for determining the plot size and numbers of plots per block in field experiments. J. Agric. Sci. 103:11-15.
13. LÚCIO A. D., L. STORCK, D. A. BANZATTO, 1999 Classificaç ão dos experimentos de competição de cultivares quanto a sua precisão. Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha 5:99-103.
14. nd ed. New Zealand: University of Otaga, 356 p.
15. MARTIN T. N., L. STORCK, A. D. LÚCIO, M. P. CARVALHO, P. M. SANTOS, 2005 Bases genéticas de milho e alterações no plano experimental. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 40:35-40.
16. MEIER V. D., K. J. LESSMAN, 1971 Estimation of optimum field plot shape and size testing yield in Crambe abyssinica hordnt. Crop Sci. 11:648-650.
17. nd edition. Lavras: UFLA, 322 p.
18. SMITH H. F., 1938 An empirical law describing heterogeneity in the yields of agricultural crops. J. Agric. Sci. 28:1-23.
19. rd edition. New York: McGraw Hill Book, 666 p.
20. STORCK L., D. A. BISOGNIN, A. CARGNELUTTI FILHO, 2005 Ganho genético decorrente da substituição anual de cultivares de milho. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 40:881-886.