Searching for individual entities: A query analysis

2010 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, IRI 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 115-120

  Bazzanella, Barbara ^a   Stoermer, Heiko ^b   Bouquet, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b FONDAZIONE BRUNO KESSLER   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; SEMANTICS;

BAYESIAN MODELLING; ENTITY-TYPES; INFORMATION SEARCH; INTERNET SEARCHES; KEYWORD QUERIES; NAIVE BAYESIAN; QUERY ANALYSIS; SEARCH QUERIES; SEARCHING FOR INFORMATIONS; SPECIFIC INFORMATION;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 77957984737     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IRI.2010.5558955     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. B. Bazzanella, T. Palpanas, and H. Stoermer. Towards a general entity representation model. In Proceedings of IRI 2009, the 10th IEEE Internationational Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, August 10-12, 2009, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE Computer Society, August 2009. to appear.
2. B. Bazzanella, H. Stoermer, and P. Bouquet. Top Level Categories and Attributes for Entity Representation. Technical Report 1, University of Trento, Scienze della Cognizione e della Formazione, September 2008. http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/archive/00001467/.
3. P. Bouquet, H. Stoermer, C. Niederee, and A. Mana. Entity Name System: The Backbone of an Open and Scalable Web of Data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, ICSC 2008, number CSSICSC 2008-4-28-25, pages 554-561. IEEE Computer Society, August 2008.
4. A. Broder. A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum, 36(2):3-10, 2002.
5. J. Guo, G. Xu, X. Cheng, and H. Li. Named entity recognition in query. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval SIGIR 09 (2009), 2009.
6. B. Jansen and U. Pooch. A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52:235-246, 2001.
7. S. Kripke. Naming and Necessity. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1980.
8. E. Rosh and C. Mervis. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7:573-605, 1975.
9. G. Sartori and L. Lombardi. Semantic relevance and semantic disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16:439-452, 2004.
10. P. Simons and C. Dement. Aspects of the Mereology of Artifacts, pages 255-276. Kluwer, Boston, 1996.
11. R. S.Taylor. Process of asking questions. American Documentation, 13:391-396, 1962.
12. H. Stoermer and P. Bouquet. A Novel Approach for Entity Linkage. In Proceedings of IRI 2009, the 10th IEEE Internationational Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, August 10-12, 2009, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE Computer Society, August 2009. to appear.
13. P. Tan, M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar. Introduction to Data Mining. Addison-Wesley, 2005.
14. R. S. Taylor. Question-negotiation and information-seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29:178-194, 1968.
15. J. Teevan, C. Alvarado, M. S. Ackerman, and D. R. Karger. The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search. In CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 415-422, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.