Vascular epiphytes in dry oak forests show resilience to anthropogenic disturbance, cordillera oriental;colombia en bosques secos de roble las epífi tas vasculares muestran resistencia a la alteración humana, cordillera oriental, colombia

Caldasia

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 161-174

  Higuera, Diego ^a   Wolf, JAN H D ^b  

^a Programa de Investigación   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bromeliaceae; Deforestation; Forest canopy; Fragmentation; Secondary tropical forest; Svera; Tropical montane forest

Indexed keywords

BROMELIACEAE; QUERCUS;

EID: 77957977567     PISSN: 03665232     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ACEBEY, A., S.R. GRADSTEIN & T. KRÖMER. 2003. Species richness and habitat diversifi cation of bryophytes in submontane rain forest and fallows of Bolivia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19: 9-18.
2. ALZATE, F., F. CARDONA & R. CALLEJAS. 2001. Diversidad y composición de epífitas vasculares en robledales de Antioquia (Colombia). Actualidades Biológicas 23: 25-31.
3. BARTHLOTT, W., V. SCHMIT-EUERBURG, J., NIEDER and S. ENGWALD., 2001. Diversity and abundance of vascular epiphytes: a comparison of secondary vegetation andprimary montane rain forest in the Venezuelan Andes. Plant Ecology 152: 145-156.
4. BENAVIDES, A.M., J.H.D. WOLF & J.F. DUIVENVOORDEN. 2006. Recovery and succession of epiphytes in upper Amazonian fallows. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22: 705-717.
5. BENZING, D.H. 1990. Vascular Epiphytes. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
6. BORCARD, D. & P. LEGENDRE. 2004. SpaceMaker2 - User's guide. Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal. Available from the WWWeb site http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/biol/legendre/.
7. BORCARD, D., P. LEGENDRE & P. DRAPEAU. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
8. BRAAK TER, C.J.F. 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69:69-77.
9. BRAAK TER, C.J.F. 1988. CANOCO - an extension of DECORANA to analyze species-environment relationships. Vegetatio 75: 159-160.
10. BROADBENT, E.N., G.P. ASNER, M. KELLER, D.E. KNAPP & P.J.C.S. OLIVEIRA, JOSE N. 2008. Forest fragmentation and edge effects from deforestation and selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Biological Conservation 141: 1745-1757.
11. BUSSMANN, R.W. 2001. Epiphyte diversity in a tropical Andean forest- Reserva Biológica San Francisco, Zamora-Chinchipe, Ecuador. Ecotropica 7: 43-59.
12. CÁRDENAS-L., D. and N.R. SALINAS. 2007. Libro Rojo de plantas de Colombia. Volumen 4. Especies maderables amenazadas: primera parte. Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI - Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial. Bogotá, D.C.
13. CASCANTE-MARÍN, A., N. VON MEIJENFELDT, H. DELEE UW, J.H.D. WOLF, J.G.B. OOSTERMEIJER and J.C.M. DEN NIJS. 2009. Dispersal limitation in epiphytic bromeliad communities in a Costa Rican fragmented montane landscape. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25: 63-73.
14. FLORES-PALACIOS, A. and J.G. GARCIA-FRANCO. 2008. Habitat isolation changes the beta diversity of the vascular epiphyte community in lower montane forest, Veracruz, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 191-207.
15. GALEANO, C., J.C. LINARES & L.M. ARDENAS. 2009. Algunos aspectos ecologicos de las Bromeliaceae y Orchidaceae epifi tas en bosque de Quercus humboldtii, en la Reserva Biologica Cachalú, Santander Colombia. Pp. 10-11 in Resumens IIsimposio internacional de bosques de roble y ecosistemas asociados. Fundacion Natura Colombia, Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas. Bogotá, D.C.
16. GENTRY, A.H. & C.H. DODSON. 1987. Diversity and biogeography of neotropical vascular epiphytes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74: 205-233.
17. HIETZ-SEIFERT, U., P. HIETZ and S. GUEVARA. 1996. Epiphyte vegetation and diversity on remnant trees after forest clearance in southern Veracruz, Mexico. Biological Conservation 75: 103-111.
18. HOFSTEDE, R.G.M., J.H.D. WOLF & D.H. BENZING. 1993. Epiphytic mass and nutrient status of an Upper Montane Rain Forest. Selbyana 14: 37-45.
19. HOLDRIDGE, L.F. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center. San José, Costa Rica.
20. ISAZA, C. & J. BETANCUR. 2009. Relationships between biomass and morphological characters of phytotelmata bromeliads in a Colombian upper Andean forest. Caldasia 31: 1-7.
21. KELLY, D.L., E.V.J. TANNER, E.M.N. LUGHADHA & V. KAPOS. 1994. Floristics and biogeography of a rain-forest in the Venezuelan Andes. Journal of Biogeography 21: 421-440.
22. KÖSTER, N., K. FRIEDRICH, J. NIEDER & W. BARTHLOTT. 2009. Conservation of Epiphyte Diversity in an Andean Landscape Transformed by Human Land Use. Conservation Biology 23: 911-919.
23. KREFT, H., N. KOSTER, W. KUPER, J. NIEDER & W. BARTHLOTT. 2004. Diversity and biogeography of vascular epiphytes in Western Amazonia, Yasuni, Ecuador. Journal of Biogeography 31: 1463-1476.
24. KRÖMER, T. & S.R. GRADSTEIN. 2003. Species richness of vascular epiphytes in two primary forests and fallows in the Bolivian Andes. Selbyana 24: 190-195.
25. KUN, A., B. OBORNY & U. DIECKMANN. 2009. Intermediate landscape disturbance maximizes metapopulation density. Landscape Ecology 24: 1341-1350.
26. KUUSSAARI, M., R. BOMMARCO, R.K. HEIKKINEN, A. HELM, J. KRAUSS, R. LINDBORG, E. OCKINGER, M. PARTEL, J. PINO, F. RODA, C. STEFANESCU, T. TEDER, M. ZOBEL &I. STEFFAN-DEWENTER. 2009. Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 564-571.
27. LAURANCE, W.F. 2004. Forest-climate interactions in fragmented tropical landscapes. Philosophical Transactionsof the Royal Society of London Series BBiological Sciences 359: 345-352.
28. LIIRA, J. & T. SEPP. 2009. Indicators of structural and habitat natural quality in boreo-nemoral forests along the management gradient. Annales Botanici Fennici 46: 308-325.
29. LOVEJOY, T.E., R.O. BIERREGAARD, A.B. RYLANDS, J.R. MALCOLM, C.E. QUINTELA, L.H. HARPER, K.S. BROWN, G.V.N. POWELL, H.O. POWELL, R. SCHUBART & M.B. HAYS. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. Pp. 257-325 in M. E. Soule, ed. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland.
30. LOZANO, G. & J. H. TORRES. 1974. Aspectos generales sobre la distribución, sistemática fi tosociológica y clasifi cación ecológica de los bosques de robles (Quecus) en Colombia. Ecologia Tropical 1: 45-79.
31. MERWIN, M.C., S.A. RENTMEESTER & N.M. NADKARNI. 2003. The influence of host tree species on the distribution of epiphytic bromeliads in experimental monospecifi c plantations, La Selva, Costa Rica. Biotropica 35: 37-47.
32. MITCHELL, A.W., K. SECOY and T. ACKSON. 2002. The Global Canopy Handbook. Techniques of access and study in the forest roof. Global Canopy Programme. Oxford.
33. MURPHY, P.G. & A.E. LUGO. 1986. Ecology of Tropical Dry Forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 67-88.
34. MURPHY, P.G. & A.E. LUGO. 1995. Dry forests of Central America and the Caribbean. Pp. 9-34 in S. H. Bullock, H. A. Mooney and E. Medina, ed. Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
35. NADKARNI, N.M. & T.J. MATELSON. 1992. Biomass and nutrient dynamics of epiphytic litterfall in a neotropical montane forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica 24(1): 24-30.
36. REYES-GARCÍA, C., H. GRIFFITHS, E. RINCÓN and P. HUANTE. 2008. Niche Differentiation in Tank and Atmospheric Epiphytic Bromeliads of a Seasonally Dry Forest. Biotropica 40: 168-175.
37. TURNER, I.M., K.S. CHUA, J.S.Y. ONG, B.C. SOONG & H.T.W. TAN. 1996. A century of plant species loss from an isolated fragment of lowland tropical rain forest. Conservation Biology 10: 1229-1244.
38. WERNER, F.A. & S.R. GRADSTEIN. 2009. Diversity of dry forest epiphytes along a gradient of human disturbance in the tropical Andes. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 59-68.
39. WERNER, F.A., J. HOMEIER & S.R. GRADSTEIN. 2005. Diversity of vascular epiphytes on isolated remnant trees in the montane forest belt of southern Ecuador. Ecotropica 11: 21-40.
40. WOLF, J.H.D. 2005. The response of epiphytes to anthropogenic disturbance of pine-oak forests in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 212: 376-393.
41. WOLF, J.H.D. & A. FLAMENCO-S. 2003. Patterns in species richness and distribution of vascular epiphytes in Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Biogeography 30: 1689-1707.
42. WOLF, J.H.D. & A. FLAMENCO-S. 2006. Vascular epiphytes and their potential as a conservation tool in pine-oak forests of Chiapas, Mexico. Pp. 375-391 in M.Kappelle, ed. Ecology and conservation of neotropical montane oak forests. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.
43. WOLF, J.H.D., S.R. GRADSTEIN & N.M. NADKARNI. 2009. A protocol for sampling of vascular epiphyte richness and abundance. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25: 107-121.
44. ZOTZ, G. & J.L. ANDRADE. 2002. La ecología y la fi siología de las epífi tas y las hemiepífi tas. Pp. 271-296 in M. R. Guariguata and G. H. Catan, ed. Ecología y conservación de bosques neotropicales. Libro Universitario Regional del Instituto Tecnológico de Costa. San José, Costa Rica.