Helping identify when users find useful documents: Examination of query reformulation intervals

IIiX 2010 - Proceedings of the 2010 Information Interaction in Context Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 215-224

  Liu, Chang ^a   Gwizdka, Jacek ^a   Liu, Jingjing ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Implicit relevance feedback; Information retrieval; Query reformulations; Search stage; Task type; User behavior

Indexed keywords

QUERY REFORMULATION; RELEVANCE FEEDBACK; SEARCH STAGE; TASK TYPE; USER BEHAVIORS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 77957963966     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1840784.1840816     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Agichtein, E., Brill, E., Dumais, S., & Ragno, R. (2006). Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. In SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM Press.
2. Aula, A., Khan, R. & Guan, Z. (2010). How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? Proc. CHI, 35-44.
3. Bates, M. J. (1979). Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(4), 205-214.
4. Borlund, P. (2003). The IIR evaluation model: A framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information Research, 8(3), paper no. 152. Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper152.html
5. Byström, K. & Jarvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 191-213.
6. Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S., & White, T. (2005). Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 23(2), 147-168.
7. Hassan, A., Jones, R., & Klinkner, K. L. (2010). Beyond DCG: User behavior as a predictor of a successful search. In WSDM '10: Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on web search and data mining. ACM.
8. Huang, J. & Efthimiadis, E. N. (2009). Analyzing and evaluating query reformulation strategies in Web search logs. In Proceedings CIKM '09, 77-86.
9. Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2005). Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceedings of 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2005) (pp. 154-161). New York: ACM Press.
10. Kellar, M., Watters, C., & Shepherd, M. (2007). A field study characterizing web-based information-seeking tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 999-1018.
11. Kelly, D. (2004). Understanding implicit feedback and document preference: A naturalistic user study. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University.
12. Kelly, D. (2005). Implicit feedback: Using behavior to infer relevance. In A. Spink and C. Cole (Eds.) New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval. Springer Publishing: Netherlands (pp.169-186).
13. Kelly, D. & Belkin, N.J. (2004). Display time as implicit feedback: Understanding task effects. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '04), Sheffield, UK, 377-384.
14. Kelly, D. & Teevan, J. (2003). Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: A bibliography. SIGIR Forum, 37(2), 18-28.
15. Liu, J. & Belkin, N.J. (2010). Personalizing information retrieval for multi-session tasks: The role of task stage and task type. In SIGIR '10: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM Press.
16. Morita, M. & Shinoda, Y. (1994). Information Filtering Based on User Behavior Analysis and Best MatchText Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '94), (pp. 272-281), Ireland.
17. Radlinski, F. & Joachims, T. (2005). Query Chains: Learning to rank from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data mining (KDD '05), 239-248.
18. Teevan, J., Dumais, S. T., & Horvitz, E. (2005). Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities. Paper presented at the SIGIR '05: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Salvador, Brazil. 449-456.
19. Toms, E., O'Brien, H., Mackenzie, T, et al. (2008). Task Effects on Interactive Search: The Query Factor. In: Fuhr N, Kamps J, Lalmas M, Trotman A. Eds. Focused Access to XML Documents. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4862. Springer Verlag. pp. 359-372.
20. White, R. W. & Kelly, D. (2006). A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, (CIKM '06).