A statistical signature for automatic dialogue classification

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Pesarin, A ^a   Cristani, M ^a   Murino, V ^a   Drioli, C ^a   Perina, A ^a   Tavano, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION;

ARTIFICIAL SYSTEMS; AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS; CLASSIFICATION RESULTS; GAUSSIAN MIXTURE MODEL; GENERATIVE MODEL; HUMAN-HUMAN COMMUNICATION; INFLUENCE MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNATURES;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 77957958696     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2008.4761075     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. C. Asavathiratham. A Tractable Representation for the Dynamics of Networked Markov Chain. PhD thesis, Dept. of ECS, MIT, 2000.
2. C. Bishop and M. Tipping. A hierarchical latent variable model for data visualization. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 20(3):281-293, 1998.
3. K. Hird and K. Kirsner. The relationship between prosody and discourse in spontaneous discourse. Brain and Language, 80:536-55, 2002.
4. I. McCowan, D. Gatica-Perez, S. Bengio, G. Lathoud, M. Barnard, and D. Zhang. Automatic analysis of multimodal group actions in meetings. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 27(3), 2005.
5. D. H. McFarland. Respiratory markers of conversational interaction. J. of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(128):43-48, 2001.
6. L. Rabiner. A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. of IEEE, 77(2):257-286, 1989.
7. D. Richardson, R. Dale, and N. Kirkham. The art of conversation is coordination. Psychological Science, 18:407-413, 2007.
8. B. S.Basu, T.Choudhury and A.Pentland. Learning human interaction with the influence model. Technical Report 539, MIT MediaLab, 2001.
9. K. R. Scherer, T. Johnstone, and T. Bnziger. Automatic verification of emotionally stressed speakers: The problem of individual differences. In Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Speech and Computer, 1998.
10. E. Shriberg. Can prosody aid the automatic classification of dialog acts in conversational speech? Language and Speech, 41(4):439-487, 1998.