Kernel functions for robust 3D surface registration with spectral embeddings

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Liu, Xiuwen ^a   Donate, Arturo ^a   Jemison, Matthew ^b   Mio, Washington ^b  

^a Florida State University   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D SURFACE; COMMONLY USED; CRITICAL STEPS; EMBEDDINGS; GAUSSIAN KERNELS; GEODESIC DISTANCES; KERNEL FUNCTION; REGISTRATION PROCESS; RIGID TRANSFORMATIONS; SHAPE ANALYSIS; SHAPE REGISTRATION; SPECTRAL REPRESENTATIONS;

GEODESY; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 77957947016     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(4):509-522, 2002.
2. P. J. Besl and N. D. Mckay. A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(2):239-256, 1992.
3. F. L. Bookstein. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(6):567-585, 1989.
4. I. Borg and P. Groenen. Modern Multidimensional Scaling. Springer, New York, 1997.
5. M. Carcassoni and E. R. Hancock. Correspondence matching with modal clusters. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(12):1609-1615, 2003.
6. H. Chui and A. Rangarajan. A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 89:114-141, 2003.
7. A. Elad and R. Kimmel. On bending invariant signatures for surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(10):1285-1295, 2003.
8. V. Jain, R. Zhang, and O. V. Kaick. Non-rigid spectral correspondence of triangle meshes. International Journal for Shape Modeling, 2008.
9. V. Kraevoy and A. Sheffer. Cross-parameterization and compatible remeshing of 3d models. ACM Transations on Graphics, 23(3):861-869, 2004.
10. V. Kraevoy, A. Sheffer, and C. Gotsman. Matchmaker: Constructing constrained texture maps. In ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 326-333, 2003.
11. D. Mateus, F. Cuzzolin, R. P. Horaud, and E. Boyer. Articulated shape matching by robust alignment of embedded representations. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1-8, 2007.
12. G. L. Scott and H. C. Longuet-Higgins. An algorithm for associating the features of two images. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 244(1309):21-26, 1991.
13. L. S. Shapiro and J. M. Brady. Feature based correspondence: an eigenvector approach. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 10(5):283-288, 1992.
14. Y. Shi, P. M. Thompson, G. I. de-Zubicaray, S. E. Rose, Z. Tu, I. Dinov, and A. W. Toga. Direct mapping of hippocampal surfaces with intrinsic shape context. NeuroImage, 37:792-807, 2007.