Evaluation of reperfused myocardial infarction by low-dose multidetector computed tomography using prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-triggering: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

Yonsei Medical Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 683-691

  Gweon, Hye Mi ^a   Kim, Sang Jin ^a   Kim, Tae Hoon ^a   Lee, Sang Min ^a   Hong, Yoo Jin ^a   Rim, Se Joong ^b   Hong, Bum Ki ^b   Min, Phil Ki ^b   Yoon, Young Won ^b   Kwon, Hyuck Moon ^b  

^a Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science ^*  (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Delayed enhancement imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial infarction; Prospective ECG gated MDCT

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIATION DOSE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77957942891     PISSN: 05135796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.5.683     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gutberlet M, Fröhlich M, Mehl S, Amthauer H, Hausmann H, Meyer R, et al. Myocardial viability assessment in patients with highly impaired left ventricular function: comparison of delayed enhancement, dobutamine stress MRI, end-diastolic wall thickness, and TI201-SPECT with functional recovery after revascularization. Eur Radiol 2005;15:872-880.
2. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C, Amado LC, George RT, Saliaris AP, et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 2006;113:394-404.
3. Kühl HP, Papavasiliu TS, Beek AM, Hofman MB, Heusen NS, van Rossum AC. Myocardial viability: rapid assessment with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging with three-dimensional inversion-recovery prepared pulse sequence. Radiology 2004; 230:576-582.
4. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1445-53.
5. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002;106:2051-2054.
6. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318-2323.
7. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, Kachelriess M, Ropers D, Giesler T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 2000;102: 2823-2828.
8. Chiou KR, Liu CP, Peng NJ, Huang WC, Hsiao SH, Huang YL, et al. Identification and viability assessment of infarcted myocardium with late enhancement multidetector computed tomography: comparison with thallium single photon emission computed tomography and echocardiography. Am Heart J 2008;155: 738-745.
9. Sato A, Hiroe M, Nozato T, Hikita H, Ito Y, Ohigashi H, et al. Early validation study of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability and the prediction of left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2008;29:490-498.
10. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Abbara S, Hoffmann U, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrastenhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 2008;247:49-56.
11. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss CA, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29:191-197.
12. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, Dubinsky TJ, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 2008;248: 431-437.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
14. Büecker A, Katoh M, Krombach GA, Spuentrup E, Bruners P, Gunther RW, et al. A feasibility study of contrast enhancement of acute myocardial infarction in multislice computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and gross morphology in pigs. Invest Radiol 2005;40:700-704.
15. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Klumpp B, Fenchel M, Ohmer M, Miller S, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in a reperfused porcine model: evaluation of different MSCT contrast protocols in acute and subacute infarct stages in comparison with MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:290-298.
16. Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, van der Giessen WJ, Krestin GP, Duncker DJ, et al. Assessment of acute reperfused myocardial infarction with delayed enhancement 64-MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:W135-W137.
17. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, Wildberger JE, Spuentrup E, Buecker A, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:2042-2047.
18. Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Kuttner A, Heuschmid M, Kopp AF, Schröder S, et al. Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECGgating. Rofo 2003;175:1051-1055.
19. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Yamamoto H, Matsuura N, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 2008;248:424-430.
20. Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E, Mennicke M, et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:911-916.
21. Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Heuschmid M, Georg C, Ohnesorge B, et al. Coronary arteries: retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography with selective optimization of the image reconstruction window. Radiology 2001;221:683-688.