Have you got a license for that tree?: (And can you afford to use it?)

The Bioengineered Forest: Challenges for Science and Society

Volumn 9781936331352, Issue , 2004, Pages 163-180

  Bryson, Nancy S ^a   Quarles, Steven P ^b   Mannix, Richard J ^b  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^b Crowell and Moring LLP   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957939821     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781936331352     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon, 515 U.S. 687 (1995).
2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 462 U.S. 87, 97 (1983).
3. CAA (Clean Air Act). U.S. Code Title 42. Chapter 85. Sections 7401-7671q. (2000).
4. CERCLA (The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act). U.S. Code Title 42. Chapter 103. Sections 9601-9675 (2000).
5. Corrosion Proof Fittings v. EPA, 947 F.2d 1201 (5th Cir. 1991).
6. Edmonds Institute v. Babbitt, 42 F. Supp. 2d 1, 17-20 (D.D.C. 1999).
7. ESA (Endangered Species Act). U.S. Code Title 16. Chapter 35. Sections 1531-1544 (2000).
8. FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act). U.S. Code Title 7. Sec. 136 et seq. (2000).
9. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler, 756 F.2d 143 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
10. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Johnson, 661 F. Supp. 107, 109 (D.D.C. 1986).
11. Kleppe v. Sierra Club, 427 U.S. 390, 410 n.21 (1976).
12. NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act). U.S. Code Title 42. Sections 4321-4347 (2000).
13. (NRC) National Research Council. Committee on Environmental Impacts Associated with Commercialization of Transgenic Plants. 2002. Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants: The Scope and Adequacy of Federal Regulation. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
14. (OSTP) Office of Science and Technology Policy. 1986. Notice: Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology. Federal Register 51(June 26): 23302.
15. (OSTP) Office of Science and Technology Policy. 1992. Notice: Exercise of Federal Oversight within Scope of Statutory Authority: Planned Introductions of Biotechnology Products into the Environment. Federal Register 57(Feb. 2): 6753.
16. (OSTP) Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2002. Notice: Proposed Federal Actions to Update Field Test Requirements for Biotechnology Derived Plants and to Establish Food Safety Assessments for New Proteins Produced by Such Plants. Federal Register 67(Aug. 2): 50578.
17. PPA (Plant Protection Act). U.S. Code Title 7. Sec. 7701-7772 (2000).
18. RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act). U.S. Code Title 42. Sec. 6901-6992k (2000).
19. TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). U.S. Code Title 15. Sec. 2601-2692 (2000).
20. USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service). 1997a. Notice: Monsanto Co.; Receipt of Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Genetically Engineered Tomato. Federal Register 62 (Nov. 28):63312.
21. USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service). 1997b. Final Rule: Genetically Engineered Organisms and Products; Simplification of Requirements and Procedures for Genetically Engineered Organisms. Federal Register (May 2): 23945, 23947.
22. U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1994. Proposed Rule: Microbial Products of Biotechnology; Proposed Regulation under the Toxic Substances Control Act. Federal Register 59 (Sept. 1): 45526, 45527.
23. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 435 U.S. 519, 540-48 (1978).
24. Warren County v. North Carolina, 528 F.Supp. 276, 286 (E.D.N.C. 1981).