Quasi-experimental design

Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 539-550

  Shadish, William R ^a   Luellen, Jason K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957938402     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203874769-37     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon.
2. Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., & Reinsel, G. C. (1994). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
5. Cicirelli, V. G., & Associates. (1969). The impact of Head Start: An evaluation of the effects of Head Start on children's cognitive and affective development (Vol. 1 & 2). A Report to the Office of Economic Opportunity. Athens: Ohio University and Westinghouse Learning Corporation.
6. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Hoag, A., Brickley, D. J., & Cawley, J. M. (2001). Media management education and the case method. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 55, 49-59.
8. Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-970.
9. Molnar, A., Smith, P., Zahorik, J., Palmer, A.., Halback, A., & Ehrle, K. (1999). Evaluating the SAGE Program: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 165-177.
10. Mosca, J. B., & Howard, L. W. (1997). Grounded learning: Breathing life into business education. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 90-93.
11. O’Leary, K. D., Becker, W. C., Evans, M. B., & Saudargas, R. A. (1969). A token reinforcement program in a public school: A replication and systematic analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 3-13.
12. Raudenbush, S. W., & Willms, J. D. (Eds.). (1991). Schools, classrooms, and pupils: International studies of schooling from a multilevel perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic.
13. Reynolds, K. D., &West, S. G. (1987). A multiplist strategy for strengthening nonequivalent control group designs. Evaluation Review, 11, 691-714.
14. St. Pierre, R. G., Ricciuti, A., & Creps, C. (1998). Summary of state and local Even Start evaluations. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
15. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Shapiro, J. Z. (1984). The social costs of methodological rigor: A note on the problem of massive attrition. Evaluation Review, 8, 705-712.
17. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
18. Stecher, B. M., & Bornstedt, G. W. (2000). Class size reductions in California: The 1998-99 evaluation findings. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
19. Trochim, W. M. K. (1984). Research design for program evaluation: The regression-discontinuity approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.