The effect of stereoscopy and motion cues on 3D interpretation task performance

Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 167-170

  Van Schooten, Boris W ^a   Van Dijk, Elisabeth M A G ^a   Zudilova Seinstra, Elena ^b   Suinesiaputra, Avan ^c   Reiber, Johan H C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Angiography; Medical visualization; Motion cue; Stereoscopy

Indexed keywords

3D INTERPRETATION; 3D STRUCTURE; ADDED VALUES; ERROR RATE; MEDICAL VISUALIZATION; MOTION CUE; MOTION CUES; STEREOSCOPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; USER CONTROL; USER PERFORMANCE; USER STUDY; VASCULAR STRUCTURES;

ANGIOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VISUALIZATION;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 77957936684     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1842993.1843023     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. K. W. Arthur, K. S. Booth, and C. Ware. Evaluating 3d task performance for fish tank virtual worlds. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 11(3):239-265, 1993.
2. R. Bade, F. Ritter, and B. Preim. Usability comparison of mouse-based interaction techniques for predictable 3d rotation. In 5th international symposium on smart graphics: SG 2005, pages 138-150, Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. Springer.
3. W. Barfield, C. Hendrix, and K.-E. Bystrom. Effects of stereopsis and head tracking on performance using desktop virtual environment displays. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 8(2):237-240, 1999.
4. M. F. Bradshaw, A. D. Parton, and A. Glennerster. The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information. Vision Research, 40(27):3725-3734, 2000.
5. K. S. Hale and K. M. Stanney. Effects of low stereo acuity on performance, presence and sickness within a virtual environment. Applied Ergonomics, 37(3):329-339, 2006.
6. A. Hill. Withindows: A Unified Framework for the Development of Desktop and Immersive User Interfaces. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2007.
7. K. O. McGraw, M. D. Tew, and J. E. Williams. The integrity of web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data? Psychological Science, 11(6):502-506, 2000.
8. F. Mikší cek. Causes of visual fatigue and its improvements in stereoscopy. Technical Report DCSE/TR-2006-04, University of West Bohemia, 2006.
9. U.-D. Reips. Standards for internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49(4):243-256, 2002.
10. R. L. Sollenberger and P. Milgram. Effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three-dimensional path-tracing task. Human Factors, 35(3):483-499, 1993.
11. C. Ware and G. Franck. Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions. ACM Trans. Graph., 15(2):121-140, 1996.
12. C. Ware and P. Mitchell. Visualizing graphs in three dimensions. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 5(1):1-15, 2008.
13. C. D. Wickens, S. Todd, and K. Seidler. Three-dimensional displays: Perception, implementation, and applications. Technical Report CSERIAC 89-001, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 1989.