Relaxation of ACID properties in AuTrA, the adaptive user-defined transaction relaxing approach

Future Generation Computer Systems

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 58-66

  Khachana, Rose Tshoganetso ^a   James, Anne ^a   Iqbal, Rahat ^a  

^a Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptable architectures; Computer supported cooperative work; Transaction processing; User issues; Web based services

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

ACID PROPERTIES; ADAPTABLE ARCHITECTURE; BUSINESS BENEFITS; TRANSACTION PROCESSING; TRANSACTION THROUGHPUT; USER ISSUES; WEB ENVIRONMENT; WEB-BASED SERVICE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 77957911896     PISSN: 0167739X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2010.05.004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. J. Gray, Notes on database operating systems, in: Operating Systems, An Advanced Course, in: LNCS, vol. 60, 1978, pp. 393-481.
2. *, in: Proc. Second International Symposium on Distributed Data Bases, Berlin, September 1982, pp. 291-309.
3. C. Godart, Coo: a transactional model to support cooperating software developers' coordination, in: Proc. 4th European Software Engineering Conference, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, in: LNCS, vol. 717, 1993, pp. 361-379.
4. D. Agrawal, A. E. Abbadi, A. K. Singh, Consistency and orderability: semanticsbased correctness criteria for databases, ACM Transactions on Database Systems 18 (3) (1993) 460-486.
5. M. Rusinkiewicz, W. Klas, T. Tesch, J. Walsch, P. Muth, Towards a cooperative transaction model: the cooperative activity model, in: Proc. 21st VLDB Conference, 1995, pp. 194-205.
6. D. B. Terry, M. M. Theimer, K. Petersen, A. J. Demers, M. J. Spreitzer, C. H. Hauser, Managing update conflicts in Bayou, a weakly connected replicated storage system, in: Proc. of the Fifteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1995, pp. 172-183.
7. R. Conradi, J.-O. Larsen, M. Nguyen, A. I. Wang, C. Liu, Transaction models for software engineering database, in: Proc. of Dagstuhl Workshop on Software Engineering Databases, 1997.
8. E. Pitoura, B. Bhargava, Data consistency in intermittently connected distributed systems, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 11 (6) (1999) 896-915.
9. J. Roberts, K. Srinivasan, Tentative hold policy part 1: white paper, W3C Note 28, November 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/tenthold-1.
10. J. Roberts, T. Collier, P. Malu, K. Srinivasan, Tentative hold protocol, part 2: technical specification. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE- tenthold-2-20011128/.
11. H. Yu, A. Vahdah, Design and evaluationofconit-based continuous consistency for replicated services, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 20 (3) (2002) 239-282.
12. J. Park, K. S. Choi, Design of an efficient tentative hold protocol for automated coordination of multi-business, in: Proc. IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce, CE'03, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 2003, pp. 215-222.
13. H. Ramampiaro, M. Nydard, CAGISTrans: providing adaptable transactional support for cooperative work-extended treatment, Information Technology and Management 5 (2004) 23-64.
14. M. Younas, R. Iqbal, Developing collaborative editing applications using web services, IEEE Distributed Systems Online Journal of Collaborative Computing 4 (9) (2003).
15. M. Younas, B. Eaglestone, R. Holten, A review of multidatabase transactions on the web. From the ACID to the SACReD, in: British National Conference on Databases, BNCOD, in: LNCS, vol. 1832, Springer, Exeter, UK, 2000, pp. 140-152.
16. F. Zhou, C. Jin, W. Zheng, TODS: cluster object storage platform designed for scalable services, Future Generation Computer Systems 20 (2004) 549-563.
17. X. Ding, J. Wei, T. Haung, User-defined atomicity constraints: a more flexible transaction model for reliable service composition, in: LNCS, vol. 4260, 2006, pp. 168-184.
18. W. Zhou, L. Wang, W. Jia, An analysis of update ordering in distributed replication systems, Future Generation Computer Systems 20 (2004) 565-590.
19. S. Bhiri, O. Perrin, C. Godart, Ensuring required failure atomicity of composite web services, in: Proc. of the ACM WWW Conference, Japan, 2005, pp. 138-147.
20. M. C. Fauvet, H. Duarte, M. Dumas, B. Benatallah, Handling transactional properties in web service composition, in: LNCS, vol. 3806, 2005, pp. 273-289.
21. M. Younas, K. Chao, A tentative commit protocol for composite web services, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 72 (2006) 1226-1237. (Pubitemid 44441323)
22. P. Greenfield, A. Fekete, J. Jang, D. Kuo, S. Nepal, Isolation support for servicesbased applications-a position paper, in: Proc. 3rd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, CIDR, Asilomar, California, USA, 2007, pp. 314-323.
23. B. Lee, S. Lim, J.-H. Kim, G. C. Fox, Lease-based consistency schemes in the web environment, Future Generation Computer Systems 25 (2009) 8-19.
24. T. Khachana, A. E. James, R. Iqbal, Adaptive user-defined transaction approach for CSCW, in: Proc. 13th Intl. Conf. on CSCWD, Chile, April 2009, pp. 362-367.