The influence of (toll-related) travel costs in residential location decisions of households: A stated choice approach

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 785-796

  Tillema, Taede ^a   van Wee, Bert ^b   Ettema, Dick ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Multinomial and mixed logit; Residential location choice; Road pricing; Stated choice

Indexed keywords

COSTS; FUELS; LOCATION; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRANSPORTATION CHARGES; TRAVEL TIME;

MIXED LOGIT; RELATED FACTORS; RESIDENTIAL LOCATIONS; ROAD PRICING; STATED CHOICE; STATED CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; STATED CHOICE SURVEYS; VALUE OF TIME;

HOUSING;

LOCATION DECISION; LOGIT ANALYSIS; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; ROAD PRICING; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 77957911211     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alonso W. Location and Land Use, Toward a General Theory of Land Rent 1964, Cambridge, MA.
2. Anas A., Xu R. Congestion, land use, and job dispersion: a general equilibrium model. Journal of Urban Economics 1999, 45:451-473.
3. Arnott R. Congestion tolling and urban spatial structure. Journal of Regional Science 1998, 38(3):495-504.
4. Banister, D., 2002. The integration of road pricing with land use planning. Imprint-Europe, pp. 1-18. http://www.imprint-eu.org/public/Papers/Imprint_Banister_final.pdf.
5. Blok P.M., Boeckhout I.J., Verster A.C.P. Oriënterend onderzoek naar de ruimtelijke effecten van rekening rijden - Exploratory research into the spatial effects of road pricing 1989, NEI, Netherlands Economic Institute, Rotterdam.
6. Calfee J., Winston C. The value of automobile travel time: implications for congestion policy. Journal of Public Economics 1998, 69:83-102.
7. Clark W.A.V. Recent research on migration and mobility: a review and interpretation. Progress in Planning 1982, 18:1-56.
8. Clark W.A.V., Burt J.E. The impact of workplace on residential relocation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1980, 70(1):59-67.
9. Clark W.A.V., Huang Y., Withers S. Does commuting distance matter? Commuting tolerance and residential change. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2003, 33:199-221.
10. Daunfeldt S.O., Rudholm N., Rämme U. Congestion charges and retail revenues: results from the Stockholm road pricing trial. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:306-309.
11. Dieleman F.M. Modelling residential mobility; a review of recent trends in research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2001, 16:249-265.
12. EC, 2001. European transport policy for 2010: time to decide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities COM 2001 370 final 12 September. European Commission, Brussels.
13. Eliasson J., Mattson L.G. Transport and location effects of road pricing: a simulation approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2002, 3:417-456.
14. Fosgerau M. Investigating the distribution of the value of travel time savings. Transportation Research B 2006, 40:688-707.
15. Giuliano G. New directions for understanding transportation and land use. Environment and Planning A 1989, 21:145-159.
16. Glaister S., Graham D.J. An evaluation of national road user charging in England. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39:632-650.
17. Greene, W.H., 2002. LIMDEP version 8.0 - Econometric Modeling Guide. Econometric Software, Inc.
18. Gunn H. Spatial and temporal transferability of relationships between travel demand, trip cost and travel time. Transportation Research Part E 2001, 37:163-189.
19. Hanson S., Pratt G. Reconceptualizing the links between home and work in urban geography. Economic Geography 1988, 64(4):299-321.
20. Hensher D.A. The valuation of commuter travel time savings for car drivers: evaluating alternative model specifications. Transportation 2001, 28:101-118.
21. Hensher D.A. Towards a practical method to establish comparable values of travel time savings from stated choice experiments with differing design dimensions. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:829-840.
22. Hensher D.A., Greene W.H. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 2003, 30:133-176.
23. Kim C. Commuting time stability: a test of a co-location hypothesis. Transportation Research Part A 2008, 42:524-544.
24. Kim J.H., Pagliara F., Preston J. The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour. Urban Studies 2005, 42(9):1621-1636.
25. Kocur, G., Adler, T., Hyman, W., Aunet, B., 1982. Guide to Forecasting Travel Demand with Direct Utility Assessment Report No UMTA-NH-11-0001-82, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
26. Louvière J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Mattsson, L.G., Sjölin, L., 2002. Transport and location effects of a ring road with or without road pricing. 42nd European Regional Science Association Congress, August 27-31, 2002, Dortmund. http://www.ersa.org/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/056.pdf.
28. May A.D., Milne D.S. Effects of alternative road pricing systems on network performance. Transportation Research Part A 2000, 34:407-436.
29. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, 2006. Nota Mobiliteit PKB deel IV: naar een betrouwbare en voorspelbare bereikbaarheid - The moblity policy plan PKB part IV: to a reliable and predictable accessibility, The Hague, The Netherlands. http://www.notamobiliteit.nl/pdf/nm4/pkb4.pdf.
30. Mokhtarian P.L., Chen C. TTB or not TTB, that is the question: a review and analysis of the empirical literature on travel time (and money) budgets. Transportation Research Part A 2004, 38(9-10):643-675.
31. Molin, E., Timmermans, H., 2003. Accessibility considerations in residential choice decisions: accumulated evidence from the Benelux. TRB 2003 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Washington, DC.
32. Moore, E.G., 1972. Residential mobility in the city. Association of American Geographers, Commission on College Geography, Resource paper 13, Washington, DC. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/35/b2/a0.pdf.
33. Muconsult Ruimtelijke effecten prijsbeleid - Spatial Effects Pricing Policy 2000, Mu-consult, Amersfoort.
34. Mun S., Konoshi K., Yoshikawa K. Optimal cordon pricing in a non-monocentric city. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39:723-736.
35. O'Farrell P.N., Markham J. Commuting costs and residential location. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 1975, 66(2):66-74.
36. Pérez P.E., Martínez F.J., Ortúzar J. de D. Microeconomic formulation and estimation of a residential location choice model: implications for the value of time. Journal of Regional Science 2003, 43(4):771-789.
37. Phang S.-Y., Toh R.T. From manual to electronic road congestion pricing: the Singapore experience and experiment. Transportation Research Part E 1997, 33(2):97-106.
38. Revelt D., Train K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1998, 80(4):647-657.
39. Rossi P.H. Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility 1955, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
40. Rouwendal J., Meijer E. Preferences for housing, jobs, and commuting: a mixed logit analysis. Journal of Regional Science 2001, 41(3):475-505.
41. Rouwendal J., Rietveld P. Changes in commuting distances of Dutch households. Urban Studies 1994, 31(9):1545-1557.
42. Still B.G., May A.D., Bristow A.L. The assessment of transport impacts on land use: practical uses in strategic planning. Transport Policy 1999, 6:83-98.
43. TfL Congestion Charging 6 Months on (Report) 2003, Transport for London, London.
44. TfL Central London Congestion Charging - Impacts Monitoring (Sixth Annual Report) 2008, Transport for London, London.
45. Tillema T., Van Wee G.P., Rouwendal J., Van Ommeren J. Firms: changes in trip patterns, production prices, locations and in the human resource policy due to road pricing. Pricing in Road Transport: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective 2008, 106-130. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK. E.T. Verhoef, G.P. van Wee, E.M. Steg, M.C.J. Bliemer (Eds.).
46. Tillema T., De Jong T., Van Amelsfoort D.H., Van Wee G.P. Sensitivity of geographical accessibility measures under road pricing conditions. Pricing in Road Transport: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective 2008, 227-249. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK. E.T. Verhoef, G.P. van Wee, E.M. Steg, M.C.J. Bliemer (Eds.).
47. Timmermans H., Van Noortwijk L., Oppewal H., Van der Waerden P. Modeling constrained choice behaviour in regulated housing markets by means of discrete choice experiments and universal logit models: an application to the residential choice behaviour of divorcees. Environment and Planning A 1996, 28:1095-1112.
48. Train K.E. Mixed logit. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. Van Amelsfort, D.H., 2009. Behavioural responses and network effects of time-varying road pricing. TRAIL Thesis Series No. T2009/4, The Netherlands TRAIL Research School, Delft.
50. Van Ommeren J., Fosgerau M. Workers' marginal costs of commuting. Journal of Urban Economics 2009, 65:38-47.
51. Van Ommeren J., Rietveld P., Nijkamp P. Commuting: in search of jobs and residences. Journal of Urban Economics 1997, 42:402-421.
52. Van Ommeren J., Rietveld P., Nijkamp P. Job moving, residential moving, and commuting: a search perspective. Journal of Urban Economics 1999, 46:230-253.
53. Van Wee G.P. Pricing Instruments for Transport Policy. Environment, Incentives and the Common Market 1995, 97-124. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London. F.J. Dietz, H.R.J. Vollebergh, J.L. de Vries (Eds.).
54. Van Wee, B., Rietveld, P., Meurs, H., 2002. A constant travel time budget? In search for explanations for an increase in average travel time Research Memorandum 2002-31, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. Free University, Amsterdam. http://zappa.ubvu.vu.nl/20020031.pdf.
55. Pricing in Road Transport: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective 2008, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK. E. Verhoef, M. Bliemer, L. Steg, B. Van Wee (Eds.).
56. Verster, A.C.P., 1986. Locatiegedrag van beroepsbeoefenaars, de invloed van afstandsgebonden kosten - Location behaviour of workers, the influence of distance related costs. PhD dissertation, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
57. Vickerman R.W. Urban and regional change, migration and commuting - the dynamics of workplace, residence and transport choice. Urban Studies 1984, 21:15-29.
58. Vickerman, R.W., 2005. Evaluating the wider economic impacts of congestion charging schemes: the limitations of conventional modelling approaches. 45th European Regional Science Association Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Amsterdam. http://www.kent.ac.uk/economics/staff/rwv/WorkingPapers/ERSA2005-congestioncharging.pdf.
59. Wardman M. The value of travel time (a review of British evidence). Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1998, 32(3):285-316.
60. Wardman M. A review of British evidence on time and service quality valuations. Transportation Research Part E 2001, 37:107-128.
61. Weinberg D.H. The determinants of intra-urban household mobility. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1979, 9:219-246.
62. Weisbrod G.E., Lerman S.R., Ben-Akiva M. Trade offs in residential location decisions: transportation versus other factors. Transportation Policy and Decision Making 1980, 1:13-26.
63. Wingo L. Transportation and Urban Land 1961, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
64. Zax S., Kain J.F. Commutes, quits and moves. Journal of Urban Economics 1991, 29:153-165.