Dsm‐5 and the ‘psychosis risk syndrome’: The DSM‐5 proposal is better than DSM‐IV

Psychosis

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 187-190

  Woods, Scott W ^a   Carlson, Jon P ^a   McGlashan, Thomas H ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

DSM 5; Early detection; Prevention; Psychosis; Risk syndrome; Schizophrenia

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957908420     PISSN: 17522439     EISSN: 17522447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2010.511719     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Amminger, G.P., Schafer, M.R., Papageorgiou, K., Klier, C.M., Cotton, S.M., Harrigan, S.M., et al. (2010). Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids for indicated prevention of psychotic disorders: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(2), 146–154.
2. Cannon, T.D., Cadenhead, K.S., Cornblatt, B., Woods, S.W., Addington, J., Walker, E.F., et al. (2008). Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: A multisite longitudinal study in North America. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65(1), 28–37.
3. Carpenter, W.T. (2009). Anticipating DSM-V: Should psychosis risk become a diagnostic class? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 55(5), 841–843.
4. Johannessen, J.O., & McGorry, P. (2010). DSM-5 and the “Psychosis Risk Syndrome”: The need for a broader perspective. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches, 2(2), 93–96.
5. Kaymaz, N., & van Os, J. (2010). DSM-5 and the “Psychosis Risk Syndrome”: Babylonic confusion. Psychosis, 2(2), 100–103.
6. Kingdon, D., Hansen, L., & Turkington, D. (2010). DSM-5 and the “Psychosis Risk Syndrome”: Would it be useful and where would it fit? Psychosis, 2(2), 103–106.
7. Petersen, R.C., Smith, G.E., Waring, S.C., Ivnik, R.J., Tangalos, E.G., & Kokmen, E. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment - Clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology, 56(3), 303–308.
8. Ruhrmann, S., Schultze-Lutter, F., Salokangas, R.K.R., Heinimaa, M., Linszen, D., Dingemans, P., et al. (2010). Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and adults at high risk: Results from the Prospective European Prediction of Psychosis Study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(3), 241–251.
9. Woods, S.W. (2010). DSM-5 needs a psychosis risk syndrome. New Orleans, LA: American Psychiatric Association.
10. Woods, S.W., Addington, J., Cadenhead, K.S., Cannon, T.D., Cornblatt, B.A., Heinssen, R., et al. (2009). Validity of the prodromal risk syndrome for psychosis: Findings from North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35, 894–908.
11. Yung, A.R., Nelson, B., Stanford, C., Simmons, M.B., Cosgrave, E.M., Killackey, E., et al. (2008). Validation of “prodromal” criteria to detect individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis: 2 year follow-up. Schizophrenia Research, 105(1-3), 10–17.
12. Yung, A.R., Phillips, L.J., Yuen, H.P., & McGorry, P.D. (2004). Risk factors for psychosis in an ultra high-risk group: Psychopathology and clinical features. Schizophrenia Research, 67(2-3), 131–142.