|
Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 340-345
|
Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for the in utero evaluation of central nervous system anomalies: Clinical article
|
Author keywords
Central nervous system; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prenatal imaging; Ultrasonography
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM MALFORMATION;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
ENCEPHALOCELE;
FETUS;
FETUS ECHOGRAPHY;
HOLOPROSENCEPHALY;
HUMAN;
HYDROCEPHALUS;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION;
POSTNATAL CARE;
PRENATAL CARE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SPINAL DYSRAPHISM;
ADULT;
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ECHOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
FETUS DISEASE;
FOLLOW UP;
GESTATIONAL AGE;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
PATHOLOGY;
PREGNANCY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARDS;
VALIDATION STUDY;
ADULT;
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM;
FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
FEMALE;
FETAL DISEASES;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
GESTATIONAL AGE;
HUMANS;
HYDROCEPHALUS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PREGNANCY;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;
|
EID: 77957888494
PISSN: 19330707
EISSN: 19330715
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.3171/2010.7.PEDS09511 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (29)
|
References (10)
|