Improving micropropagation: Effect of azospirillum brasilense Sp245 on acclimatization of rootstocks of fruit tree

Journal of Plant Interactions

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 249-259

  Vettori, Lorenzo ^a   Russo, Anna ^b   Felici, Cristiana ^c   Fiaschi, Grazia ^c   Morini, Stefano ^c   Toffanin, Annita ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Azospirillum brasilense; Indole 3 acetic acid (iaa); Micropropagation; Pgpr; Rootstock

Indexed keywords

AZOSPIRILLUM; AZOSPIRILLUM BRASILENSE; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MALUS X DOMESTICA; PRUNUS; PRUNUS CERASIFERA; PRUNUS DOMESTICA; PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 77957882742     PISSN: 17429145     EISSN: 17429153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17429145.2010.511280     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ahmed Z, Akhter F, Shamsul Haque M, Banu A, Motiur Rahman M, Faruquzzaman AKM. 2001. Novel micro propagation system. J Biolog Sci. 1(11):1106-1111.
2. Baldani VLD, Alvarez MA, Baldani JI, Dobereiner J. 1986. Establishment of inoculated Azospirillum spp. in the rhizosphere and in roots of field grown wheat and sorghum. Plant Soil. 90:35-46.
3. Balla I, Vrrtesy J, Ktives-Pechy K. 1997. Acclimatation results of micropropagated black locust (Robinia pseu-doacacia L.) improved by use of microorganisms. In: Cassells AL, editor. Pathogen and microbial contamination management in micropropagation. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 351-354.
4. Bashan Y, Holguin G, de-Bashan LE. 2004. Azospirillum-plant relationships: Physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances (1997 2003). Can J Microbiol. 50(8):521-577.
5. Benhamou N, Kloepper JW, Quadt-Hallman A. 1996. Induction of defence-related ultra-structural modifications in pea root tissues inoculated with endophyti bacteria. Plant Physiol. 112:919-929.
6. Bethlenfalvay GJ, Andrade G, Azcón-Aguilar C. 1997. Plant and soil response to mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria in nodulated or nitrate-fertilized peas (Pisum sativum L.). Biol Fert Soils. 24:164-168.
7. Carletti S. 2002. Use of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria in plant micro propagation. Available on: www.ag.auburn.edu.
8. Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Barassi CA. 1998. Water relations in Azospirillum inoculated wheat seedlings under osmotic stress. Can J Bot. 76(2):238-244.
9. Dehne HW. 1982. Interactions between VAM fungi andplant pathogens. Phytopathology. 72:1115-1119.
10. Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, Thys A, Ptacek D, Vanderleyden J, Dutto P, Labandera-Gonzalez C, Caballero-Mellado J, Aguirre JF, Kapulnik Y, Brener S, Burdman S, Kadouri D, Sarig S, Okon Y. 2001. Response of agronomically important crops to inoculation with Azospirillum. Aust J Plant Physiol. 28:871-879.
11. Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y. 2003. Plant growth-promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizo-sphere. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 22:107-149.
12. Driver JA, Kuniyuki AH. 1984. In vitro propagation of Paradox walnut rootstock. HortScience. 19:507 509.
13. Duffy EM, Hurley EM, Cassells AC. 1999. Weaning performance of potato microplants following bacterization and mycorrhization. Potato Res. 42:521-527.
14. Grunewaldt-Stoecker G. 1997. Problems with the health of in vitro propagated Anthurium spp. and Phalaenopsis hybrids. In: Cassells AC, editor. Pathogen and microbial contamination management in micropropagation. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 363-370.
15. Hassan E, Hossein AA, Abolfazl AA. 2009. Evaluation of plant growth hormones production (IAA) ability by Iranian soils rhizobial strains and effects of superior strains application on wheat growth indexes. World Appl Sci J. 6(11):1576-1584.
16. Heinrich D, Hess D. 1985. Chemotactic attraction of Azospirillum lipoferum by wheat roots and characterization of some attaractants. Can J Microbiol. 31:26-31.
17. Hunt MD, Ryals JA. 1996. Systemic acquired resistance signal transduction. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 15:583-606.
18. Honda H, Kobayashi T. 2004. Large-scale micropropagation system of plant cells. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 91:105-134.
19. Hooker JE, Black KE, Perry RL, Atkinson D. 1995. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induced alteration to
20. root longevity of poplar. Plant Soil. 172:327-329
21. Kloepper JW, Tuzun S, Zehnder GW. 1997. Multiple disease protection by rhizobacteria that induce systemic resistance-historical perspective. Phytopathology. 87:136-137.
22. Lazarovits G, Nowak J. 1997. Rhizobacteria for improvement of plant growth and establishment. HortScience. 32:188-192.
23. Levanony H, Bashan Y. 1989. Localization of specific antigens of Azospirillum brasilense Cd in its exopoly-saccarhide by immuno-gold staining. Curr Microbiol. 18:145-149.
24. Michiels KW, Croes CL, Vanderleyden J. 1991. Two different modes of attachment of Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 to wheat roots. J Gen Microbiol. 137:2241-2246.
25. Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissues cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473-497.
26. Murphy J, Mark L, Periappuram C. 1997. Microbial characterisation and preparation of inoculum for in vitro mycorrhization of strawberry in autotrophic ulture. In: Cassells AL, editor. Pathogen and micro-bial contamination management in micropropagation. ordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 345-350
27. Nelson CE. 1987. The water relations of vesicular-arbuscular ycorrhizal systems. In: Safir GR, editor. Ecophysiology f V A mycorrhizal plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 71-91.
28. Nowak J. 1998. Benefits of in vitro 'biotization' of plant issue cultures with microbial inoculants. In Vitro Cell ev Biol Plant. 34:122-130.
29. Nowak J, Asiedu SK, Lazarovits G. 1995. Enhancement of n vitro growth and transplant stress tolerance of potato and vegetable plants cocultured with a plant growth romoting rhizobacterium. In: Carre E, Chagvardieff P,editors. Ecophysiology and photosynthetic in vitro cultures. Aix-en-Provence, France: CEA. pp 173-180.
30. Okon Y, Itzigsohn R. 1995. The development of Azospirllum as a commercial inoculant for improving crop ields. Biotechnol Adv. 13(3):415-424.
31. Okon Y, Labandera-Gonzales CA. 1994. Agronomic pplication of Azospirillum: An evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biol Biochem. 6:1591-1601.
32. Patriquin DG, Dobereiner J. 1978. Light microscopy bservations of tetrazolium-reducing bacteria in theendorhizosphere of maize and other grasses in Brazil.Can J Microbiol. 24:734-747.
33. Preece JE, Sutter EG. 1991. Acclimation of micropropagated plants to the greenhouse and field. In: DeberghPC, Zimmerman RH, editors. Micropropagation,technology and application. Dordrecht, NL: KluwerAcademic Publishers. pp 71-93
34. Russo A, Felici C, Toffanin A, Gotz M, Collados C, BareaJM, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Smalla K, Vanderleyden J,Nuti MP. 2005. Effect of Azospirillum inoculants onarbuscolar mycorrhizza establishment in wheat andmaize plants. Biol Fertil Soils. 41:301-309.
35. Russo A, Vettori L, Felici C, Fiaschi G, Morini S, ToffaninA. 2008. Enhanced micropropagation response andbiocontrol effect of Azospirillum brasilense Sp245onPrunus cerasifera L. clone Mr.S 2/5plants. J Biotech-nol. 134:312-319.
36. Sachs RM. 1965. Stem elongation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol.16:73-96.
37. Saniewski M, Ueda J, Miyamoto K, Okubo H. 2006. Auxintransport and stem growth in tulips: The role ofepidermis, cortex and pith. Acta Horticult. 673:199-205.
38. Somers E, Ptacek D, Gysegom P, Srinivasan M, Vander-leyden J. 2005. Azospirillum brasilense produces theauxin-like phenylacetic acid by using the key enzymefor indole-3-Acetic acid biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 71(4):1803-1810.
39. Steenhoudt O, Vanderleyden J. 2000. Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated withgrasses: Genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects.FEMS Microbiol Rev. 24:487-506.
40. Teltscherová L, Pavlova L, Pleskotová D. 1976. Changes inthe content of endogenous auxins in apical buds ofChenopodium rubrum L. induced with respect to theendogenous rhythm in capacity to flower. Biologia Plantarum. 19(3):205-211.
41. Van Huylenbroeck JM, Debergh PC. 1996. Physiologicalaspects in acclimatization of micropropagated plantlets. Plant Tissue Cult Biotech. 2:136-141.
42. Vande Broek A, Michielis J, Van Gool A, Vanderleyden J.1993. Spatial-temporal colonization patterns of Azos-pirillum brasiliense on the wheat root surface andexpression of bacterial nifH gene during association.Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 6:592-600.
43. Vestberg M, Kukkonen S, Saari K, Parikka P, Huttunen J,Tainio L, Devos N, Weekers F, Kevers C, Thonart P,Lemoine MC, Cordier C, Alabouvette C, Gianinazzi S.2004. Microbial inoculation for improving the growthand health of micropropagated strawberry. Appl SoilEcol. 27:243-258.
44. Wilhelm E, Arthofer W, Schafleitner R. 1997. Bacillussubtilis an endophyte of chestnut (Castanea sativa) asantagonist against chestnut blight (Cryphonectariaparasitica). In: Cassells AC, editor. Pathogen and microbial contamination management in micropropagation. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.pp 331-337.
45. Williamson B, Cooke DEL, Duncan JM, Leifert C, BreeseWA, Shattock RC. 1997. Fungal infections of micro propagated plants at weaning: A problem exemplifiedby downy mildew in Rubus at weaning. In: CassellsAC, editor. Pathogen and microbial contaminationmanagement in micropropagation. Dordrecht, NL:Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 309-320.