Long-term results of sacral neuromodulation with the tined lead procedure

Journal of Urology

Volumn 184, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1997-2000

  Marcelissen, Tom A T ^a   Leong, Randall K ^a   De Bie, Rob A ^b   Van Kerrebroeck, Philip E V ^a   De Wachter, Stefan G G ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Electric stimulation therapy; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive; Urinary bladder

Indexed keywords

LEAD;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICTURITION; NEUROMODULATION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SACRUM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TINED LEAD PROCEDURE; URINE RETENTION; WOUND INFECTION; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; LUMBOSACRAL PLEXUS; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; TIME; URINARY BLADDER, OVERACTIVE; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY RETENTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBOSACRAL PLEXUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS; URINARY BLADDER, OVERACTIVE; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY RETENTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957841704     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.142     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. S.T. Hasan, W.A. Robson, and A.K. Pridie Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and temporary S3 neuromodulation in idiopathic detrusor instability J Urol 155 1996 2005
2. U. Jonas, C.J. Fowler, and M.B. Chancellor Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation J Urol 165 2001 15
3. M.M. Hassouna, S.W. Siegel, and A.A. Nyeholt Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of urgency-frequency symptoms: a multicenter study on efficacy and safety J Urol 163 2000 1849
4. P.E. van Kerrebroeck, A.C. van Voskuilen, and J.P. Heesakkers Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study J Urol 178 2007 2029
5. S.W. Siegel, F. Catanzaro, and H.E. Dijkema Long-term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, and retention Urology 56 2000 87
6. J.L. Bosch, and J. Groen Sacral nerve neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with refractory motor urge incontinence: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study J Urol 163 2000 1219
7. M. Spinelli, G. Giardiello, and M. Gerber New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience J Urol 170 2003 1905
8. M. Spinelli, E. Weil, and E. Ostardo New tined lead electrode in sacral neuromodulation: experience from a multicentre European study World J Urol 23 2005 225
9. S.E. Sutherland, A. Lavers, and A. Carlson Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: one institution's 11-year experience Neurourol Urodyn 26 2007 19
10. A. Hijaz, and S. Vasavada Complications and troubleshooting of sacral neuromodulation therapy Urol Clin North Am 32 2005 65
11. A.C. van Voskuilen, D.J. Oerlemans, and E.H. Weil Long term results of neuromodulation by sacral nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective single center study Eur Urol 49 2006 366
12. T.C. Dudding, D. Pars, and C.J. Vaizey Comparison of clinical outcome between open and percutaneous lead insertion for permanent sacral nerve neurostimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 52 2009 463
13. D.Y. Deng, M. Gulati, and M. Rutman Failure of sacral nerve stimulation due to migration of tined lead J Urol 175 2006 2182
14. W.A. Scheepens, E.H. Weil, and G.A. van Koeveringe Buttock placement of the implantable pulse generator: a new implantation technique for sacral neuromodulationa multicenter study Eur Urol 40 2001 434