Power sector reform in Maharashtra, India

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 7082-7092

  Totare, Ninad P ^a   Pandit, Shubha ^b  

^a Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering   (India)

^b SARDAR PATEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING   (India)

Author keywords

Electricity supply model; Key Performance Index; Power sector reform

Indexed keywords

ACTION PLAN; CONSUMER SERVICES; DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES; ELECTRIC SUPPLY; ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY MODEL; FINANCIAL RESOURCES; KEY PARAMETERS; KEY PERFORMANCE INDEX; MAHARASHTRA , INDIA; NEW PROJECTS; POWER SECTOR; POWER SECTOR REFORM; STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDS; TARIFF STRUCTURES;

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ELECTRICITY; INDUSTRY;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS;

ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY POLICY; INDUSTRIAL RESTRUCTURING; TARIFF STRUCTURE;

INDIA; MAHARASHTRA;

EID: 77957774468     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ABPS Infrastructure Advisory, 2006. Introduction of availability based tariff regime at state level within Maharashtra and related issues, November 13.
2. ABPS Infrastructure Advisory, 2007. Distributed generation based Franchisee for electricity distribution, a discussion paper, February.
3. Bhattacharyya Subhes C. An over view of problems and prospects for the Indian power sector. Energy 1994, 19(7):795-803.
4. Central Electricity Authority, 2003. Electricity Bill 2003. Government of India.
5. Central Electricity Authority, 2009. Operation Performance Monitoring Division. Electrical Energy Generation Review (April 08-Jan. 09).
6. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, 1998. Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, Government of India. Available at http://www.cercind.gov.in.
7. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2002. Implementation of ABT in Western Region, New Delhi, India.
8. Dixit, Shantanu, Sant, Girish., Wagle, Subodh, 1998.Regulation in the WB-Orissa model: cure worse than disease. Economic and Political Weekly-vol. XXXIII(17), April 25.
9. Kanungo Committee., 2001. Report of the Committee of Independent Experts. Government of Orissa, India.
10. Kirschen, Starbac Fundamentals of Power System Economics 2004, John Wily & Sons Ltd.
11. Mehta, Ajoy, 2009. Face 2 Face. IEEMA, October, pp. 59-63.
12. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2002.Tariff booklet for year 2001-02.
13. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2003a.Tariff booklet for year 2003-04.
14. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2003b. In the matter of State Government subsidy in respect of agricultural and powerloom consumers, Case no. 60 of 2003.
15. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2004a. Trading license conditions regulations 2004.
16. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2004b. In the matter of State Govt. subsidy for providing free electricity supply to agricultural consumers, Case no. 13 of 2004.
17. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2004c. Transmission license conditions regulations 2004.
18. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2005a. Annual Report 2004-05.
19. Maharashtra, Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2005b. Distribution open access regulation.
20. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2005c. Tariff order for year 2006-07, Case no. 54 of 2005.
21. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2005d. In the matter of State Govt. subsidy for providing free electricity supply to agricultural consumers, Case no. 28 of 2005.
22. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2005e. In the matter of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited petition for approval of rates for power purchase from captive power project holders, Case no. 47 of 2005.
23. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2005f. Methodology for computation of Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access transactions 2005.
24. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2006a. Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) Proposal to use Captive Power to mitigate load shedding in Pune Urban Circles of MSEDCL, Case no. 29 of 2005, January 25.
25. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2006b. Development of Transmission Pricing Framework for the State of Maharashtra and other related matters, Case no. 58 of 2005, June 27.
26. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2006c. Determination of Transmission Tariff for Intra-State Transmission System for FY 2006-07, Case no. 31 of 2006, September 29.
27. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2006d. Tariff order for year 2007-08, Case no. 65 of 2006.
28. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2006e. State Grid Code Regulations.
29. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2007a.Tariff order for year 2008-09, Case no. 72 of 2007.
30. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2007b. Determination of Transmission Tariff for Intra-State Transmission System for the first year of the MYT Control Period (2007-08 to 2009-10), April 2.
31. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2007c. Determination of Annual Revenue Requirement of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd, for the Control Period from FY 2007-08 to FY 2009-10 and Tariff for Year 2007-08, May 18.
32. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2008a. Appointment of Interim Franchisee and approval of reliability charges to be recovered from Pune consumers. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Case no. 5 of 2008, June 20.
33. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2008b. License for Trading of Electricity in the State of Maharashtra License no. 2 of 2008.
34. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2009a. MSETCL Annual Performance Review for FY 2008-09 and Aggregate Revenue Requirement for FY 2009-10, Case no. 114 of 2008, May 28.
35. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2009b. License for Transmission of Electricity in the State of Maharashtra 2009.
36. Maharashtra Power Sector Reform, 2002. White Paper, Industries, Energy and Labor Department Manatralaya Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai, India, August 28.
37. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd, 2005. Ten Point Action Plan.
38. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd, 2010a. Category wise connected load of MSEDCL. Available at Last visited on 26 February 2010. http://www.mahadiscom.com/esp.
39. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd, 2010b. Circle wise distribution loss of MSEDCL. Available at Last visited on 26 February 2010. http://www.mahadiscom.com/consumer/distribution%20loss%20Circle.pdf.
40. Maharashtra State Electricity Generation Company Ltd, 2010. Installed capacity. Available at Last visited on 26 February 2010. http://www.mahagenco.com/installed-capacity-01.shtm.
41. Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd, 2010. MSETCL Infrastructure. Available at Last visited on 26 February 2010. http://www.mahatransco.com/aboutus/ataglance.shtm.
42. Ministry of Power, 1995. Private Power Promotion through Captive Power route.
43. Ministry of Power, 1997. Captive Circular.
44. Ministry of Power, 2001. Accelerated Power Development and Reform Program. Government of India. Available at http://www.powermin.nic.in/apdrp.
45. Ministry of Power, 2006a. The Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-I, Section 1, Rural Electrification Policy. Government of India.
46. Ministry of Power, 2006b. Rural Electrification Policy, Bharatnirman.
47. Minority Staff, Committee, 2002. Background on Enron's Dabhol Power Project Government Reform. U.S. House of Representatives, February 22.
48. Policy for Captive Power Generation, 1997. Industries, Energy and Labor Department Manatralaya Government of Maharashtra, Government Resolution No. MISC 1195/CR-8/NRG-7, Mumbai, India, December 20.
49. Power Exchange India, 2010.
50. Power Finance Corporation Limited, 2009. Report on the performance of the State Power Utilities for the year 2005-06 to 2007-08.
51. Prayas Energy Group, 2000. Godbole Committee on Enron Project: expose and way-out. Economic and Political Weekly, June.
52. Prayas Energy Group. 2006. Critical review of the performance of Delhi Privatized Distribution Company and the Regulatory Process. Occasional Report Prayas, Pune, India, May.
53. Rajan A, Tthillai Power sector reform in Orissa: an ex-post analysis of the casual factors. Energy Policy 2000, 28:657-669.
54. Rural Electrification Corporation Limited, 2006. Government of India. Available at http://www.recindia.nic.in/download/T_DCateg.pdf.
55. Sharma D.Paramesswara, Nair P.S.Chandramohanan, Balasubramanian R. Performance of Indian Power Sector during a decade under restructuring: critique. Energy Policy 2005, 33:563-576.
56. Sant, Girish, Dixit, Shantanu, 1995. The Enron Controversy Techno-Economic Analysis and Policy Implications. Prayas Energy Group, September. Available at http://www.prayas.com.
57. Sant, Girish, Dixit, Shantanu, Wagle, Subodh, 1995. The Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) Between Dabhol Power Company and Maharashtra State Electricity Board: the structure and its techno-economic implications. Economic and Political Weekly, June.
58. Tongia, Rahul, 2003. The Political Economy of Indian Power Sector. A working paper 4, available at http://pesd.stanford.edu/Publications.
59. Wamukonya Njeri Power sector reform in developing countries: mismatched agendas. Energy Policy 2003, 31:1273-1289.