Reorienting programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) towards disinvestment

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Mortimer, Duncan ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; BUDGET; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INVESTMENT; MALE; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW;

AUSTRALIA; BUDGETS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH EXPENDITURES; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH RESOURCES; HUMANS; INVESTMENTS; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; POLICY MAKING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 77957773466     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-288     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, House of Commons Health Committee, First Report of Session 2007-08, Volume I, Report, together with formal minutes. House-of-Commons, London: The Stationery Office Limited 2008
2. Response to the Health Select Committee's Report on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. National-Institute-for-Health-and- Clinical-Excellence, England: NICE 2007
3. Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service? S Pearson P Littlejohns, J Health Serv Res Policy 2007 12 3 160 165 10.1258/135581907781542987 17716419
4. Development of a quality framework for the Medicare Benefits Schedule. Medical-Benefits-Reviews-Task-Group, Canberra: Medical Benefits Reviews Task Group, Department of Health and Ageing 2010
5. Identification, prioritisation and assessment of obsolete health technologies. A methodological guideline. A Ruano-Ravĩa M Velasco-Gonzlez L Varela-Lema TI-RN Cerd-Mota I Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Health Technology Assessment Reports Madrid: Galician Health Technology Assessment Agency 2007
6. Identifying existing health care services that do not provide value for money. AG Elshaug JR Moss P Littlejohns J Karnon TL Merlin JE Hiller, Medical Journal of Australia 2009 190 5 269 273 19296794
7. New drugs for old: disinvestment and NICE. D Hughes R Ferner, British Medical Journal 2010 340 572 10.1136/bmj.c572 20185495
8. Supporting disinvestment and reinvestment in the health service through NICE guidance. NICE, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2008
9. Disinvestment for re-allocation: A process to identify priorities in healthcare. S Nuti M Vainieri A Bonini, Health Policy 2010 95 137 143 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.011 20015568
10. How to control the costs of health care services - An inventory of strategic options. F Dionne C Mitton J Shoveller S Peacock M Barer, Healthcare Management Forum 2009 Winter 23 30 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60139-1
11. An Evidence-Based Approach to Resource Allocation in an Australian Health Service. C Harris, Priorities 2008 Newcastle upon Tyne, England 2008
12. Road Testing Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) in three English Regions: Hull (Diabetes), Newcastle (CAHMS), Norfolk (Mental Health). L Kemp R Fordham A Robson A Bate C Donaldson S Baughan B Ferguson P Brambleby, York: YHPHO 2008
13. Twenty-five years of program budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974-1999. C Mitton C Donaldson, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2001 6 239 248 10.1258/1355819011927558 11685789
14. Road testing Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) in three English Regions: Newcastle CAMHS PBMA Pilot Project. A Robson A Bate C Donaldson, York: YHPHO 2008
15. Applying Programme Budgeting Marginal Analysis in the health sector: 12 years of experience. R Grocott, Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 2009 9 2 181 187
16. Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges. C Mitton C Donaldson, Cost Effectiveness & Resource Allocation 2004 2 3
17. Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: Bridging the divide between doctors and managers. D Ruta C Mitton A Bate C Donaldson, BMJ 2005 330 1501 1503 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1501 15976426
18. Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices. AG Elshaug JE Hiller SR Tunis JR Moss, Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 2007 4 23 10.1186/1743-8462-4-23 17973993
19. Breaking up is hard to do: The economic impact of provisional funding contingent upon evidence development. D Mortimer J Li J Watts A Harris, Health Economics, Policy & Law
20. Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers. N Smith C Mitton S Peacock E Cornelissen S MacLeod, BMC Health Services Research 2009 9 165 10.1186/1472-6963-9-165 19754969
21. The evolution of PBMA: Towards a macro-level priority setting framework for health regions. C Mitton C Donaldson H Waldner C Eagle, Health Care Management Science 2003 6 263 269 10.1023/A:1026285809115 14686632
22. Is the value of a life-year saved context specific? Further evidence from a discrete choice experiment. D Mortimer L Segal, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2008 6 8 10.1186/1478-7547-6-8 18489787
23. Priority setting in a Canadian surgical department: A case study using program budgeting and marginal analysis. CD Mitton CB Shellan C Pagenkopf, Canadian Journal of Surgery 2003 46 23 29
24. Road testing programme budgeting and marginal analysis: Norfolk Mental Health pilot project. H Ball L Kemp R Fordham, Psychiatr Bull 2009 33 141 144 10.1192/pb.bp.108.020396
25. Maximising health gain within available resources in the New Zealand public health system. P Bohmer C Pain A Watt P Abernethy J Sceats, Health Policy 2001 55 37 50 10.1016/S0168-8510(00)00107-X 11137187
26. Road Testing PBMA in three English Regions: Hull Teaching Primary Care Trust Diabetes pilot project. S Baughan B Ferguson, Yorkshire and Humber Public Health Observatory (YHPHO) 2008
27. An evaluation of PBMA applied in South Australian hospitals. Centre for Health Program Evaluation Research Report 16. S Peacock, Melbourne: Monash University 1998
28. Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: Application within programmes to assist purchasing in Greater Glasgow Health Board. S Twaddle A Walker, Health Policy 1995 33 91 105 10.1016/0168-8510(95)93671-M 10144441
29. A field study of control system redesign: The impact of institutional processes on strategic choice. MA Abernethy WF Chua, Contemporary Accounting Research 1996 13 2 569 606 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00515.x
30. Experts' guide to saving money in health. S Cook, British Medical Journal 2010 340 622 624
31. Setting priorities: Is there a role for citizens' juries? J Lenaghan B New E Mitchell, BMJ 1996 312 1591 1593 8664672
32. Public involvement policies in health: Exploring their conceptual basis. S Wait E Nolte, Health Economics, Policy and Law 2006 1 149 162 10.1017/S174413310500112X
33. Scanning the horizon of obsolete technologies: possible sources for their identification. N Ibargoyen-Roteta I Gutierrez-Ibarluzea J Asua G Benguria-Arrate L Galnares-Cordero, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009 25 3 249 254 10.1017/S0266462309990249 19619342