Driving demand: What can gasoline refueling patterns tell us about planning an alternative fuel network?

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 738-749

  Nicholas, Michael A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative fuel; Gasoline demand patterns; Hydrogen; Networks; Refueling; Station siting

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ALTERNATIVE FUEL; DEMAND ANALYSIS; LOCATION-ALLOCATION MODEL; METROPOLITAN AREA; PREDICTION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 77957768294     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Goodchild M.F., Noronha V.T. Location-allocation and impulsive shopping: the case of gasoline retailing. Spatial Analysis and Location-Allocation Models 1987, 121-136. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York. A. Ghosh, G. Rushton (Eds.).
2. Johnson, N., Yang, C., Ni, J., Johnson, J., Lin, Z. 2005. Optimal Design of a Fossil Fuel-Based Hydrogen Infrastructure with Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Case Study in Ohio. In: National Hydrogen Association Annual Hydrogen Conference, March 29-April 1. Washington, DC.
3. Kitamura R., Sperling D. Refueling behavior of automobile drivers. Transportation Research 1987, 21A:235-245.
4. Kuby M., Lim S. The flow-refueling location problem for alternative-fuel vehicles. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2005, 39:125-145.
5. Kuby M., Lines L., Schultz R., Xie Z., Kim J.-G., Lim S. Optimization of hydrogen stations in Florida using the flow-refueling location model. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:6045-6064.
6. Kuby, M. J., Lim, S., Wang, K. 2004. A model for optimal location of hydrogen refueling stations: a case study of Arizona. In: National Hydrogen Association's 15th Annual US Hydrogen Conference, April 26th-30th. Los Angeles, CA.
7. Lin, Z., Ogden, J., Fan, Y., Sperling, D. 2005. Optimal dynamic strategy of building a hydrogen infrastructure in Beijing. In: Fourth Asia Pacific Conference on Transportation and the Environment, November 8-10. Xi'an, China.
8. Market Planning Solutions International. 2003. Sacramento Valley 2003 Study. (accessed 20.03.04). http://www.mpsisys.com.
9. Market Planning Solutions International. 2009. Market Planning Solutions International Inc.: Site and Market Planning Solutions for Businesses, Analysis, Strategies, Modeling, Demographics, Market Data. (accessed 31.07.09). http://www.mpsisolutions.com/home.aspx.
10. Melendez, M., Milbrandt, A., 2006. Geographically Based Hydrogen Consumer Demand and Infrastructure Analysis. Technical Report, NREL/TP-540-40373.
11. Nicholas, M., Weinert, J., Miller, M. 2005. Hydrogen Station Economics and Station Siting in Southern California. In: Electric Vehicle Symposium 21, April 2-6. Monaco.
12. Openshaw S., Taylor P.J. The Modifiable areal unit problem. Quantitative Geography: A British View 1981, 60-69. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. N. Wrigley, R.J. Bennett (Eds.).
13. Sacramento Area Council of Governments, 2003. SACMET Travel Model, 1415 L Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95814.
14. Stephan, C., Sullivan, J., 2004. Growth of a hydrogen transportation infrastructure. In: Agent 2004: Social Dynamics: Interaction, Reflexivity and Emergence. Chicago.
15. Upchurch C., Kuby M., Lim S. A model for location of capacitated alternative-fuel stations. Geographical Analysis 2009, 41:127-148.