Information structure: Notional distinctions, ways of expression

Unity and Diversity of Languages

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 123-135

  Féry, Caroline ^a   Krifka, Manfred ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957768231     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1075/z.141.13kri     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Beaver, David, Brady Zack Clark, Edward Flemming, T. Florian Jäger & Maria Wolters. 2007. When semantics meets phonetics: Acoustical studies of second occurrence focus. Language 83: 245-276.
2. Bolinger, Dwight. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14: 109-149.
3. Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 511-545.
4. Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. 27-55. New York: Academic Press.
5. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239-297.
6. Féry, Caroline, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds). 2006. The notions of Information Structure. Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS) 6. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam. http://www.sfb632.uni-potsdam.de/isg. html.
7. Féry, Caroline & Shinichiro Ishihara. 2005. Interpreting second occurrence focus. Ms. University of Potsdam.
8. Fiedler, Ines, Katharina Hartmann, Brigitte Reineke, Anne Schwarz & Malte Zimmermann. To appear. Subject focus in West African languages. In Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), Information Structure in Different Perspectives.
9. Frota, Sónia. 2000. Prosody and Focus in European Portuguese. New York: Garland Publishing.
10. Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Halliday, Michael A.K. 1967-68 Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 3 & 4.
12. Hartmann, Katharina & Malte Zimmermann. 2007. In place-out of place: Focus in Hausa. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler, Gn information structure, meaning and form, 365-403. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Jacobs, Joachim. 2001. The Dimensions of Topic-Comment. Linguistics 39: 641-681.
15. Kiss, É., Katalin. 1998, Identificational focus versus information focus, Language 74: 245-273.
16. Krifka, Manfred. 1999. Additive particles under stress. Proceedings of SALT 8. Cornell, CLC Publications. 111-128.
17. Liberman, Mark & Janet Pierrehumbert. 1984. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Mark Aronoff & Richard T. Oehrle (eds), Language Sound Structure, 157-233. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Partee, Barbara H. 1999. Focus, quantification, and semantics-pragmatics issues. In Peter Bosch & Rob van der Sandt (eds), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, 213-231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Reinhart, Tanya. 1982. Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53-94.
20. Reis, Marga & Inger Rosengren. 1997. A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: The case of German auch. Journal of Semantics 14: 237-309.
21. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22. Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116.
23. Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. When right dislocation meets the left-periphery: A unified analysis of Italian non-final focus. Lingua 116: 836-873.
24. Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141-177.
25. Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In John Goldsmith (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory, 550-569. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
26. Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. in Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), Semantics and Philosophy. 197-214. New York: New York University Press.
27. Steedman, Mark. 2000. Information Structure and the Syntax-Phonology Interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 649-689.
28. Szendroi, Kriszta. 2003. A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus. The Linguistic Review 20 (1): 37-78.
29. Xu, Yi. 1999. Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. Journal of Phonetics 27: 55-105.
30. Zerbian, Sabine. 2006. Expression of Information Structure in the Bantu Language Northern Sotho, Doctoral diss., Humboldt University, Berlin.