A harvest failure approach to assess the threat from an invasive species

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 205-213

  Yemshanov, Denys ^a   McKenney, Daniel W ^a   de Groot, Peter ^a   Haugen, Dennis ^b   Pedlar, John ^a   Sidders, Derek ^c   Joss, Brent ^c  

^a GREAT LAKES FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bioeconomic model; Dispersal; Harvest threshold; Nonnative invasive species; Sirex noctilio; Spread model

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS;

BIO-ECONOMIC MODELLING; DISPERSAL; EASTERN CANADA; FOREST PEST; HARVEST LEVELS; HARVEST THRESHOLDS; INVASIVE SPECIES; NONNATIVE INVASIVE SPECIES; SIREX NOCTILIO; SPREAD MODEL;

HARVESTING;

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CONIFEROUS FOREST; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; HARVESTING; INSECT; INVASIVE SPECIES; PEST CONTROL; PEST DAMAGE; PEST OUTBREAK; POLICY MAKING; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY;

ARTICLE; CANADA; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HARVEST; NONHUMAN; PEST CONTROL; PEST INSECT; PINE; SIREX NOCTILIO; SPECIES INVASION;

CANADA;

SIREX NOCTILIO;

EID: 77957767266     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. APHIS (USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service) Sirex noctilio delimiting survey eastern region Downloaded from:. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/sirex/downloads/survey05-2008.pdf.
2. BCMOF (British Columbia Ministry of Forests) British Columbia's Mountain Pine Beetle Action Plan 2006-2011 2005, Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BC, Downloaded from:. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/mountain_pine_beetle/actionplan/2006/Beetle_Action_Plan.pdf.
3. BCMOF (British Columbia Ministry of Forests) Timber Supply and the Mountain Pine Beetle Infestation in British Columbia: 2007 Update 2007, Forest Analysis Branch, Victoria, BC.
4. Bedding R. Controlling the pine-killing woodwasp, Sirex noctilio, with Nematodes. Progress in Biological Control 2009, vol. 6:213-235. Springer. A.E. Hajek, T.R. Glare, M. O'Callaghan (Eds.).
5. Bettinger P., Graetz D., Boston K., Sessions J., Chung W. Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems. Silva Fennica 2002, 36(2):561-584.
6. Borchert D., Fowler G., Jackson L. Organism pest risk analysis: risks to the conterminous United States associated with the woodwasp, Sirex noctilio Fabricius, and the symbiotic fungus, Amylostereum areolatum, (Fries: Fries) Boidin USDA APHIS-PPQ-CPHST-PERAl Rep. Downloaded from:. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/Sirex/downloads/Sirex-pra.pdf.
7. Boyland M., Nelson J., Bunnell F.L. A test for robustness in harvest scheduling models. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 207:121-132.
8. Buongiorno J., Gilless J. Decision Methods for Forest Resource Managers 2003, Academic Press, Elsevier Science.
9. Carnegie A.J., Matsuki M., Haugen D.A., Hurley B.P., Ahumada R., Klasmer P., Sun J., Iede E. Predicting the potential distribution of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae), a significant exotic pest of Pinus plantations. Annals of Forest Science 2006, 63:119-128.
10. Conway B.E., Leefers L.A., McCullough D.G. Yield and financial losses associated with a jack pine budworm outbreak in Michigan and the implications for management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1999, 29:382-392.
11. Cook D., Thomas M.B., Cunningham S.A., Anderson D.L., De Barro P.J. Predicting the economic impact of an invasive species on an ecosystem service. Ecological Applications 2007, 17:1832-1840.
12. Corley J.C., Villacide J.M., Bruzzone O.A. Spatial dynamics of a Sirex noctilio woodwasp population within a pine plantation in Patagonia, Argentina. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2007, 125:231-236.
13. de Groot P., Nystrom K., Scarr T. Discovery of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in Ontario, Canada. Great Lakes Entomologist 2006, 39:49-53.
14. Drever C.R., Peterson G., Messier C., Bergeron Y., Flannigan M. Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience?. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2006, 36:2285-2299.
15. FHTET (USDA Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team) Host species susceptibility ranks Downloaded from:. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/pdfs/host_species_susceptibility.pdf.
16. Folke C., Carpenter S., Walker B., Scheffer M., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C.S. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2004, 35:557-581.
17. Gillis M.D. Canada's national forest inventory, responding to current information needs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2001, 67:121-129.
18. Haase G., Camphausen A. Best Practices for Sustainable Forest Management in Southeast Asia 2007, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH (German Technical Cooperation), Jakarta, Indonesia.
19. Haugen D.A. Sirex noctilio. Exotic Forest Pest Information System for North America 2006, North American Forest Commission, Downloaded from:. http://spfnic.fs.fed.us/exfor/data/pestreports.cfm%3Fpestidval%3D33%26langdisplay%3Denglish.
20. Haugen D.A., Underdown M. Sirex noctilio control program in response to the 1987 Green Triangle Outbreak. Australian Forestry 1990, 53:33-40.
21. Haugen D.A., Hoebeke E.R. Pest Alert Sirex Woodwasp - Sirex noctilio F. (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) 2005, USDA Forest Service, NA-PR-07-05.
22. Haugen D.A., Bedding R.A., Underdown M., Neumann F.G. National strategy for control of Sirex noctilio in Australia. Australian Forest Grower 1990, 13(2):8. (Special liftout section).
23. Hoebeke R.E., Haugen D.A., Haack R.A. Sirex noctilio: discovery of a Palearctic siricid woodwasp in New York. Newslettter of the Michigan Entomological Society 2005, 50:24-25.
24. Holling C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1973, 4:1-23.
25. Howard T.E. The forester's dilemma: paradoxes in the criteria and indicators for sustainable forestry. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 2001, 270(4):75-84.
26. Hrubes R.J. National Forest System Working Circles: A Question of Size and Ownership Composition 1976, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-16, Pacific Sowthwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Berkley, CA.
27. Hurley B.P., Slippers B., Wingfield M.J. A comparison of control results for the alien invasive woodwasp, Sirex noctilio, in the southern hemisphere. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2007, 9:159-171.
28. Keller R.P., Lodge D.M., Finnoff D.C. Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:203-207.
29. Koch F.H., Yemshanov D., McKenney D.W., Smith W.D. Evaluating critical uncertainty thresholds in a spatial model of forest pest invasion risk. Risk Analysis 2009, 29(9):1227-1241.
30. Latifovic R., Zhi-Liang Z., Cihlar J., Giri C., Olthof I. Land cover mapping North and Central America - global land cover 2000. Remote Sensing of Environment 2004, 89:116-127.
31. Leung B., Finnoff D., Shogren J.F., Lodge D. Managing invasive species: rules of thumb for rapid assessment. Ecological Economics 2005, 55:24-36.
32. Mutanen A., Viitanen J., Toppinen A., Hänninen R., Holopainen P. Forest Resources, Production and Exports of Roundwood and Sawnwood from Russia. Working Paper of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 2005, Available from. http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2005/mwp009.pdf.
33. NAPPO (North American Plant Protection Organization) 32nd NAPPO Annual Meeting. Canada Report. Guadalajara, Mexico, October 22 2008, Downloaded from:. http://www.nappo.org/annualmtg/2008/AnnualHighlights08/PP%20Presentations/GStubbings.PPT.
34. NYDEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation) Sirex woodwasp status report Downloaded from:. http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7533.html.
35. OMNR (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources) Forest Management Planning Manual for Ontario's Crown Forests 1996, Queen's Printer for Ontario, Toronto.
36. OMNR (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources) Provincial Wood Supply Strategy 2004, Queen's Printer for Ontario, Peterborough.
37. Patriquin M.N., Wellstead A.M., White W.A. Beetles, trees, and people: regional economic impact sensitivity and policy consideration related to the mountain pine beetle infestation in British Columbia, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics 2007, 9:938-946.
38. Peter B., Nelson J. Estimating harvest schedules and profitability under the risk of fire disturbance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2005, 35:1378-1388.
39. Phillips B.R., Beck J.A., Nickel T.J. Managing the Economic Impacts of Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreaks in Alberta. Foothills Model Forest Case Study 2007, The Western Centre for Economic Research, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Information Bulletin No. 100.
40. Pimentel D., Lach L., Zuniga R., Morrison D. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 2000, 50:53-64.
41. Pimentel D., Zuniga R., Morrison D. Update on the environmental end economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 2005, 52:273-288.
42. Sharov A.A., Liebhold A.M. Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecological Applications 1998, 8:1170-1179.
43. Sougavinski S., Doyon F. A Review of Spatial Distribution Guidelines for the Managed Canadian Boreal Forest 2005, Translated from French, Original title: Directives de repartition spatiale existantes pour la forêt boréale canadienne aménagée, Sustainable Forest Management Network, Edmonton, AB.
44. Toman M. Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics 1998, 25:57-60.
45. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Central States Forest Health Watch, Current Forest Health Information for Land Managers in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa and Missouri. Nov. 30, 2006 2006, Downloaded from. http://www.na.fs.fed.us/fhp/fhw/csfhw/nov06/nov06.html.
46. Vanclay J.K. Estimating Sustainable Timber Production from Tropical Forests. CIFOR Working Paper No 11 1996, 25 pp.
47. Vanclay J.K. Assessing the sustainability of timber harvests from natural forests: limitations of indices based on successive harvests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 1996, 3:47-58.
48. Vanclay J.K., Keenan R., Gerrand A., Frakes I. Beer-bottle tops: a simple forest management game. International Forestry Review 2006, 8(4):432-438.
49. Van Leeuwen G.C.M., Baayen R.P., Jeger M.J. Pest risk assessment for the countries of the European Union (as PRA area) on Monilinia fructicola. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 2001, 31:481-487.
50. Wolff G. Translating pest risk analysis into policy: the CFIA approach. Proceedings of the Workshop on Invasive Alien Species and the International Plant Protection Convention, Braunschweig, Germany, 22-26 September 2003. IPPC Secretariat. 2005 2005, FAO, Rome, Italy, Downloaded from. http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y5968e/y5968e0t.htm%23bm29.
51. Yemshanov D., McKenney D.W., Fraleigh S., D'Eon S. An integrated spatial assessment of the investment potential of three species in southern Ontario, Canada inclusive of carbon benefits. Forest Policy and Economics 2007, 10:48-59.
52. Yemshanov D., McKenney D.W., de Groot P., Haugen D., Sidders D., Joss B. A bioeconomic approach to assess the impact of a nonnative invasive insect on timber supply and harvests: a case study with Sirex noctilio in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2009, 39:154-168.
53. Yemshanov D., Koch F.H., McKenney D.W., Downing M.C., Sapio F.J. Mapping invasive species risks with stochastic models: a cross-border US-Canada application for Sirex noctilio Fabricius. Risk Analysis 2009, 29(6):868-884.