Particular and wider interests in natural resource management: Organizing together but separately*

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 25, Issue SUPPL. 9, 2010, Pages 33-44

  Arora Jonsson, Seema ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Development; Gender; Institutions; Particular and general interests; Resource management; Structure

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT; GENDER; INSTITUTIONS; PARTICULAR AND GENERAL INTERESTS; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STRUCTURE;

RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77957766619     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2010.506793     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Agarwal, B. (1997). Environmental action, gender equity and women's participation. Development and Change, 28, 1-44.
2. Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27, 629-649.
3. Agrawal, A. & Ribot, J. C. (2000). Analyzing decentralization: A framework with South Asian and West African Environmental Cases in environmental governance in Africa (Working Paper). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
4. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2005). Unsettling the order: Gendered subjects and grassroots activism in two forest communities. PhD dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
5. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2008). "Research sounds so big": Collaborative inquiry with women in Drevdagen. In L. Fortmann (Ed.), Participatory research in conservation and rural livelihoods: Doing science together (pp. 130-145). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
6. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2009). Discordant connections: Discourses on gender and grassroots activism in two forest communities in India and Sweden. Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35, 213-240.
7. Baland, J.-M. & Platteau, J.-P. (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Oxford: FAO/Clarendon Press.
8. Bardhan, P. (1993). Analytics of institutions of informal cooperation in rural development. World Development, 21, 633-639.
9. Cleaver, F. (1998). Choice, complexity, and change: Gendered livelihoods and the management of water. Agriculture and Human Values, 15, 293-299.
10. Dahlerup, D. (1998). Using quotas to increase women's political representation. In A. Kazam, & F. Ginwala (Eds.), Women in parliament. Stockholm: International Institute of Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
11. Edmunds, D. & Wollenberg, E. (Eds.) (2003). Local forest management: The impact of devolution policies. London: Earthscan.
12. Forsberg, G. (1997). Rulltrappsregioner och social infrastruktur [Escalator regions and social infrastructure]. In E. Sundin (Ed.), Om makt och kon: i spåren av offentliga organisationers omvandlig: Rapport till Utredningen om fordelningen av ekonomisk makt och ekonomiska resurser mellan kvinnor och man 1997 (83, pp. 31-68). Stockholm: Fritzes.
13. Fortmann, L. (Ed.) 2008. Participatory Research in Conservation: Doing Science Together, London: Blackwell-Wiley.
14. Hansen, K. (2000). Mellan inordning och motstånd: Om formering av lokala identiteter i nordsvenska skogsbygder [Between conformism and resistance: On the forming of local identities in northern Swedish forest communities] In I. Kaldar, E. Johansson, B. Fritzboger, & H. Snellman (Eds.), Skogsliv: Kulturella processer i nordiska skogsbygder. Forest life: Cultural processes in Nordic forest communties]. Lund: Historiska Media.
15. Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C, Venn, C. & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.) (1998). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. New York: Routledge.
16. Jefferey, R. & Sundar, N. (Eds.) (1999). A new moral economy for India's forests? Discourses of community and participation. London: Sage.
17. Kohn, M. (2000). Language, power, and persuasion: Towards a critique of deliberative democracy. Constellations, 7, 408-429.
18. Lama, A. & Buchy, M. (2004). Gender, class, caste and participation: Community forestry in central Nepal. In S. Krishna (Ed.), Livelihoods and gender: Equity in community resource management (pp. 285-305). London: Sage.
19. Marshall, J. (1993). Viewing organizational communication from a feminist perspective: A critique and some offerings. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook (pp. 122-143). London: Sage.
20. Singh, N. M. (2004). Women and community forests in Orissa: Rights and management. In S. Krishna (Ed.), Livelihoods and gender: Equity in community resource management (pp. 306-324). London: Sage.
21. Sithole, B. (2005). Becoming men in our dresses! Women's involvement in a joint forestry project in Zimbabwe. In C. Colfer (Ed.), The equitable forest: Diversity, community and resource management. Washington, DC: RFF Press.
22. Skrivelse (2001/02). En samlad naturvårdspolitik [White Paper on environmental policy, A collected environmental policy] 2001/02:173. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
23. Stoetzler, M. & Yuval-Davis, N. (2002). Standpoint theory, situated knowledge and the situated imagination. Feminist Theory, 3, 315-333.
24. Varughese, G. & Ostrom, E. (2001). The contested role of heterogeneity in collective action: Some evidence from community forestry in Nepal. World Development, 29, 747765.
25. Wollenberg, E., Anderson, J. & Edmunds, D. (2001). Pluralism and the less powerful: Accommodating multiple interests in local forest management. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 1, 199-222.