Investigation of guessability of industrial safety signs: Effects of prospective-user factors and cognitive sign features

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 689-697

  Chan, Alan H S ^a   Ng, Annie W Y ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Cognitive sign features; Guessability; Safety signs; Usability; User factors

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SIGN FEATURES; GUESSABILITY; SAFETY SIGNS; USABILITY; USER FACTORS;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; INDUSTRY; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CHINA; CHINESE; COGNITION; CONSTRUCTION WORK; FEMALE; HONG KONG; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SIGN; LABORATORY; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

EID: 77957751132     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Al-Madani H., Al-Janahi A.R. Role of drivers' personal characteristics in understanding traffic sign symbols. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2002, 34:185-196.
2. ANSI Z535.3 (2002) Criteria for Safety Symbols National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC.
3. Brelsford J.W., Wogalter M.S., Scoggins J.A. Enhancing comprehension and retention of safety-related pictorials. Selections from Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1994-2000 2001, vol. 2:30-34. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA. M.S. Wogalter, S.L. Young, K.R. Laughery (Eds.).
4. Brigham F.R. International standardization of graphical symbols for consumer products. Contemporary Ergonomics 1998, 8-12. Taylor and Francis, London, UK. J. Smith (Ed.).
5. Bruyas M.P., Le Breton B., Pauzié A. Ergonomic guidelines for the design of pictorial information. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1998, 21:407-413.
6. Chan A.H.S., Han S.H., Ng A.W.Y., Park W. Hong Kong Chinese and Korean comprehension of American security safety symbols. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2009, 39:835-850.
7. Davies S., Haines H., Norris B., Wilson J.R. Safety pictograms: are they getting the message across?. Applied Ergonomics 1998, 29(1):15-23.
8. Duarte M.E.C., Rebelo F. Comprehension of safety signs: internal and external variable influences. Proceedings of CybErg 2005, International Ergonomics Association Press, Johannesburg, SA. A. Thatcher, J. James, A. Todd (Eds.).
9. GB 2894 National Standard on Safety Signs 1996, China.
10. Goonetilleke R.S., Shih H.M., Hung K.O., Fritsch J. Effects of training and representational characteristics in icon design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2001, 55:741-760.
11. Hancock H.E., Rogers W.A., Schroeder D., Fisk A.D. Safety symbol comprehension: effects of symbol type, familiarity, and age. Human Factors 2004, 46(2):183-195.
12. ISO 3864-3 (2006) International Standard for Safety Colours and Safety Signs - Part 3: Design principles for Graphical Symbols for Use in Safety Signs International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
13. ISO 9241-11 Ergonomics Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) Part 11: Guidance on Usability 1998, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
14. Jordan P.W. An Introduction to Usability 1998, Taylor & Francis, London.
15. Laughery K.R., Wogalter M.S. Warnings and risk perception. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics 1997, 1174-1197. Wiley, London, UK. G. Salvendy (Ed.).
16. Lesch M., Rau P.-L.P., Zhao Z., Liu C. A cross-cultural comparison of perceived hazard in response to warning components and configurations: US vs. China. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2009, 40:953-961.
17. Lesch M. Comprehension and memory for warning symbols: age-related differences and impact of training. Journal of Safety Research 2003, 34:495-505.
18. Li B. Oxford Advanced Learner's English-Chinese Dictionary (Revised extended 4thed) 1999, Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.
19. Liu L., Hoelscher U., Gruchmann T. Symbol comprehension in different countries: experience gained from medical device area. Workshop-Proceedings der 5 fachübergreifenden Konferenz Mensch und Computer 2005, 81-87. Oesterreichische Computer Gesellschaft, Wien. A. Auinger (Ed.).
20. Liu T., Zhong M., Xing J. Industrial accidents: challenges for China's economic and social development. Safety Science 2005, 43:503-522.
21. McDougall S.J.P., Curry M.B. More than just a picture: icon interpretation in context. Proceedings of First International Workshop on Coping with Complexity 16-17th September 2004, Available at, University of Bath. http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/%7Ecomplex/cwc2004/Proceedings%20of%20CWC%202004.pdf.
22. McDougall S.J.P., Curry M.B., de Bruijn O. Measuring symbol and icon characteristics: norms for concreteness, complexity, meaningfulness, familiarity, and semantic distance for 239 symbols. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1999, 31(3):487-519.
23. McDougall S.J.P., Curry M.B., de Bruijn O. The effects of visual information on users' mental models: an evaluation of pathfinder analysis as a measure of icon usability. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 2001, 5(1):59-84.
24. Mono R. Design for product understanding Liber 1997, Malmö, Sweden.
25. Mullet K., Sano D. Designing Visual Interfaces: Communication oriented techniques 1995, Prentice Hall, NJ.
26. Ng A.W.Y., Chan A.H.S. The guessability of traffic signs: effects of prospective-users and sign design features. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2007, 39:1245-1257.
27. Ng A.W.Y., Chan A.H.S. What makes an icon effective. Special Edition of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2008 2009, vol. I:104-114. American Institute of Physics. S.L. Ao (Ed.).
28. Piamonte D.P.T., Abeysekera J.D.A., Ohlsson K. Understanding small graphical symbols: a cross-cultural study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2001, 27:399-404.
29. Preece J., Rogers Y., Sharp H., Beryon D., Holland S., Carey T. Human-Computer Interaction 1994, Addison-Wesley, England, UK.
30. Redström J. Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Design Studies 2006, 27(2):123-139.
31. Rogers W.A., Lamson N., Rousseau G.K. Warning research: an integrative perspective. Human Factors 2000, 42:102-139.
32. Rosson M.B. Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction 2002, Academic Press, San Francisco.
33. Shieh K.K., Huang S.M. Effects of pictorial size and circle-slash thickness on glance legibility for prohibitive symbols. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2004, 33:73-83.
34. Wang A.H., Chi C.C. Effects of hazardous material symbol labeling and training on comprehension according to three types of educational specialization. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2003, 31:343-355.
35. Wang K., Wang X. Se jue jian cha tu Ren min wei sheng chu ban she 2006, Beijing.
36. Wogalter M.S., DeJoy D.M., Laughery K.R. Organizing theoretical framework: a consolidated communication-human information processing (C-HIP) model. Warnings and Risk Communication 1999, 15-23. Taylor & Francis, Bristol, London. M.S. Wogalter, D.M. DeJoy, K.R. Laughery (Eds.).
37. Wolff J.S., Wogalter M.S. Comprehension of pictorial symbols: effects of context and test method. Human Factors 1998, 40(2):173-186.
38. Wolff J.S. A Study of Context and Test Method in Evaluating Safety Symbols (Technical report number: GIT-GVU-96-07) 1995, Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, US.
39. Xie H., Filippidis L., Gwynne S., Galea E.R., Blackshields D., Lawrence P.J. Signage legibility distances as a function of observation angle. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering 2007, 17:41-64.
40. Yang K.S. Chinese personality and its change. The Psychology of the Chinese People 1986, 106-170. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong. M.H. Bond (Ed.).
41. Young S.L. The role of pictorials in environmental safety signs. Selections from Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1994-2000 2001, vol. 2:256-259. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA. M.S. Wogalter, S.L. Young, K.R. Laughery (Eds.).