Performance sensitivity of hybrid phenolic composites in friction braking: Effect of ceramic and aramid fibre combination

Wear

Volumn 269, Issue 11-12, 2010, Pages 891-899

  Patnaik, Amar ^a   Kumar, Mukesh ^a   Satapathy, Bhabani K ^b   Tomar, Bharat S ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^c Allied Nippon Industries Limited   (India)

Author keywords

Brake clutch materials; Rolling friction; Wear testing

Indexed keywords

ARAMID FIBRE; BRAKE/CLUTCH MATERIALS; CERAMIC FIBRE; COMPOSITION DOMAINS; CONTACT PATCH; ECE REGULATIONS; FRICTION AND WEAR PERFORMANCE; FRICTION PERFORMANCE; FRICTION TESTING; FRICTIONAL FLUCTUATION; FRICTIONAL RESPONSE; IN-SITU; INDUCED TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE ATTRIBUTES; PERFORMANCE SENSITIVITY; PHENOLIC COMPOSITES; RECOVERY RESPONSE; ROLLING FRICTION; SEM; SEMI-EMPIRICAL; STATIC FRICTION; TEMPERATURE RISE; WEAR CHARACTERISTICS; WEAR-TESTING; WORN SURFACE MORPHOLOGY;

CERAMIC FIBERS; FIBERS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MATERIALS TESTING APPARATUS; PHENOLS; RECOVERY; REFRACTORY MATERIALS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SILICATES; STICTION;

TRIBOLOGY;

EID: 77957749363     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.08.023     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chan D., Stachowiak G.W. Review of automotive brake friction materials. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J. Auto. Eng. 2004, 218(9):953-966.
2. Bijwe J. Composites as friction materials: recent developments in non-asbestos fiber reinforced friction materials-a review. Polym. Compos. 2004, 18:378-396.
3. Satapathy B.K., Bijwe J. Fade and recovery behavior of non-asbestos organic (NAO) composite friction materials based on combinations of rock fibers and organic fibers. J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 2005, 24(6):563-577.
4. Satapathy B.K., Bijwe J. Performance of friction materials based on variation in nature of organic fibres Part I. Fade and recovery behaviour. Wear 2004, 257:573-584.
5. Sinha S.K., Biswas S.K. Effect of sliding speed on friction and wear of unidirectional aramid fibre/phenolic composite. J. Mater. Sci. 1995, 30:2430-2437.
6. Gopal P., Dharani L.R., Blum D. Fade and wear characteristics of a glass-fiber-reinforced phenolic friction material. Wear 1994, 174:119-127.
7. Kim S.J., Cho M.H., Lim D.S., Jang H. Synergistic effects of aramid pulp and potassium titanate whiskers in the automotive friction material. Wear 2001, 251:1484-1491.
8. Kim Y.C., Cho M.H., Kim S.J., Jang H. The effect of phenolic resin, potassium titanate, and CNSL on the tribological properties of brake friction materials. Wear 2008, 264:204-210.
9. Kim S.J, Jang H. Friction and wear of friction materials containing two different phenolic resins reinforces with aramid pulp. Tribol. Int. 2000, 33:477-484.
10. H. Jang, J.J. Lee, S.J. Kim, K.Y. Jung, The effect of solid lubricants on friction characteristics, SAE Paper 982235 (1998) 1-8.
11. Rhce S.K., Jacko M.G., Tsang P.H.S. The role of friction film in friction, wear and noise of automotive brakes. Wear 1991, 146:89-97.
12. Jang H, Lee J.S., Fash J.W. Compositional effects of the brake friction material on creep groan phenomena. Wear 2001, 251:1477-1483.
13. Aleksendric D., Duboka C. Fade performance prediction of automotive friction materials by means artificial neural networks. Wear 2007, 262:778-790.
14. Fu H., Liao B., Qi F.J., Sun B.C., Liu A.P., Ren D.L. The application of PEEK in stainless steel fiber and carbon fiber reinforced composites. Composites 2008, 39:585-591.
15. Choong-Fong T., Lu Y. Combinatorial screening of ingredients for steel wool based semimetallic and Aramid pulp based non-asbestos organic brake materials. J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 2004, 23(1):51-63.
16. B.K. Satapathy, Performance evaluation of non-asbestos fibre reinforced organic friction materials, Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, 2002.
17. Satapathy B.K., Bijwe J. Performance of friction materials based on variation in nature of organic fibres Part II. Optimisation by balancing and ranking using multiple criteria decision model (MCDM). Wear 2004, 257:585-589.
18. Satapathy B.K., Bijwe J., Kolluri D.K. Assessment of fiber contribution to friction material performance using grey relational analysis (GRA). J. Compos. Mater. 2006, 40(6):483-501.
19. Filip P., Weiss Z., Rafaja D. On friction layer formation in polymer matrix composite materials for brake applications. Wear 2002, 252:189-198.
20. Jacko M.G., Tsang P.H.S., Rhee S.K. Wear debris compaction and friction film formation of polymer composites. Wear 1989, 133:23-38.
21. Severin D., Dörsch S. Friction mechanism in industrial brakes. Wear 2001, 249:771-779.
22. Österle W., Urban I. Friction layers and friction films on PMC brake pads. Wear 2004, 257:215-226.
23. Eriksson M., Bergman F., Jacobson S. On the nature of tribological contact in automotive brakes. Wear 2002, 252:26-36.
24. Blau P.J. Friction and Wear of Materials: Break-in, Run-in, and Wear-in 1989, Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ.
25. Kinkaid N.M., O'Reilly O.M., Papadopoulos P. Automotive disc brake squeal. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2003, 267:105-166.
26. Han Y., Tian X., Yin Y. Effect of ceramic fiber on the friction performance of automotive brake lining materials. Tribol. Trans. 2008, 51:779-783.