Identification of the most sensitive parameters in the activated sludge model implemented in BioWin software

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 101, Issue 19, 2010, Pages 7278-7285

  Liwarska Bizukojc, Ewa ^a   Biernacki, Rafal ^a,b  

^a LODZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b Water Supply System and Sewer Zgierz Ltd   (Poland)

Author keywords

Activated sludge; Model parameters; Sensitivity analysis; Wastewater

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; KINETICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ACTIVATED SLUDGE MODEL; BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS; MODEL PARAMETERS; NORMALISED SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENTS; PHOSPHORUS ACCUMULATING ORGANISMS; SENSITIVITY MEASURES; STOICHIOMETRIC PARAMETERS;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

PHOSPHORUS;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BIOACCUMULATION; CALIBRATION; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PHOSPHORUS; REACTION KINETICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; STOCHASTICITY; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; KINETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SLUDGE; STOICHIOMETRY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEWAGE;

BIOREACTORS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEWAGE; SOFTWARE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

EID: 77957738854     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.065     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brun, R., Kuhni, M., Siegrist, H., Gujer, W., Reichert, P., 2002. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters - systematic selection and tuning of parameters subsets. Water Res. 36 (16), 4113-4127.
2. Damayanti, A., Ujang, Z., Salim, M.R., Olsson, G., Sulaiman, A.Z., 2010. Respirometric analysis of activated sludge models from palm and oil effluent. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 144-149.
3. Ferrai, M., Guglielmi, G., Andreotolla, G., 2010. Modelling respirometric tests for the assessment of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters on MBBR biofilm for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ. Modell. Softw. 25 (5), 626-632.
4. Ferrer, J., Seco, A., Serralta, J., Ribes, J., Manga, J., Asensi, E., Morenilla, J.J., Llavador, F., 2008. DESSAS: a software tool for designing, simulating and optimising WWTPs. Environ. Modell. Softw. 23 (1), 19-26.
5. Gernaey, K.V., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Henze, M., Lind, M., Jorgensen, S.B., 2004. Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation. State of the art. Environ. Modell. Softw. 19 (9), 763-783.
6. Grady Jr., C.P.L., Daigger, G.T., Lim, H.C., 1999. Biological Wastewater Treatment. Marcel Dekker, New York.
7. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., Matsuo, T., Wenzel, M.C., Marais, C.V.R., 1999. Activated sludge model no. 2d. Water Sci. Technol. 39 (1), 165-182.
8. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., 2000. Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, IWA, Sci. and Tech. Report No. 9. IWA Publishing, London.
9. Henze, M., Harremoës, P., Jansen, J., Arvin, E., 2002. Wastewater Treatment. Biological and Chemical Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
10. Kappeler, J., Gujer, W., 1992. Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modelling. Water Sci. Technol. 25 (6), 125-139.
11. Langergraber, G., Rieger, L., Winkler, S., Alex, J., Wiese, J., Owerdieck, C., Ahnert, M., Simon, J., Maurer, M., 2004. A guideline for simulation studies of wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol. 50 (7), 131-138.
12. Liwarska-Bizukojc, E., Scheumann, R., Drews, A., Bracklow, U., Kraume, M., 2008. Effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on the kinetics of the aerobic heterotrophic biodegradation of organic matter in industrial wastewater. Water Res. 42 (4-5), 923-930.
13. Makinia, J., 2006. Performance Prediction of Full Scale Biological Nutrient Removal Systems using Complex Activated Sludge Models. D.Sc Thesis, Univesität Hannover, Hannover.
14. Makinia, J., Rosenwinkel, K.-H., Spering, V., 2006. Comparison of two model concepts for simulation of nitrogen removal at a full scale biological nutrient removal pilot plant. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 132 (4), 476-487.
15. Melcer, H., Dold, P.L., Jones, R.M., Bye, C.M., Takacs, I., Stensel, H.D., Wilson, A.W., Sun, P., Bury, S., 2003. Methods for wastewater characterization in activated sludge modelling. Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), Alexandria, VA, USA.
16. Pala, A., Bölükbas, Ö., 2005. Evaluation of kinetic parameters for biological CNP removal from a municipal wastewater through batch tests. Process Biochem. 40 (2), 629-635.
17. Petersen, B., Gernaey, K., Henze, M., Vanrolleghem, P.A., 2002. Evaluation of an ASM1 model calibration procedure on a municipal-industrial wastewater treatment plant. J. Hydroinform. 4, 15-38.
18. Petersen, B., Gernaey, K., Henze, M., Vanrolleghem, P.A., 2003. Calibration of activated sludge models: a critical review of experimental designs. In: Agathos, S.N., Reineke, W. (Eds.), Biotechnology for the Environment: Wastewater Treatment and Modelling. Waste Gas Handling. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
19. Rieger, L., Koch, G., Kühni, M., Gujer, W., Siegrist, H., 2001. The EAWAG BIO-P module for activated sludge model no. 3. Water Res. 35 (16), 3887-3903.
20. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, R., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., Tarantola, S., 2008. Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester.
21. Sin, G., van Hulle, S.W.H., De Pauw, D.J.W., van Griensven, A., Vanrolleghem, P.A., 2005. A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: a SWOT analysis. Water Res. 39 (12), 2459-2474.
22. Sin, G., Gernaey, K.V., Neumann, M.B., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Gujer, W., 2009. Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design. Water Res. 43 (11), 2894-2906.
23. Sun, P., Wang, R., Fang, Z., 2009. Fully coupled activated (FCASM): model development. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 4632-4641.
24. US EPA, 1987. QUAL2E - The Enhanced Stream Water Quality Model EPA/823/B-95/003. Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, USA.
25. US EPA, 1993. Manual Nitrogen control EPA/625/R-93/010. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA.
26. US EPA, 2009. Guidance on the Development, Evaluation and Application on Environmental Models EPA 100/K-09-003. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA.
27. Vaiopoulou, A.E., Aivasidis, B.A., 2007. A semi-batch on-line method for biokinetics determination in an enhanced biological phosphorus removal system. In: Proceedings of European Congress of Chemical Engineering (ECCE-6), 16-20 September 2007, Copenhagen, Denmark.
28. van Veldhuizen, H.M., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Heijnen, J.J., 1999. Modelling biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a full scale activated sludge process. Water Res. 33, 3459-3468.
29. Vanrolleghem, P.A., Insel, G., Petersen, B., Sin, G., De Pauw, D., Nopens, I., Weijers, S., Gernaey, K., 2003. A comprehensive model calibration procedure for activated sludge models. In: Proceedings of WEFTEC 2003, 76th Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, 11-15 October 2003, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
30. Weijers, S.R., Vanrolleghem, P.A., 1997. A procedure for selecting the most important parameters in calibrating the activated sludge model no. 1 with full scale plant data. Water Sci. Technol. 36 (5), 69-79.