The public as policy expert: Deliberative democracy in the context of Finnish health care reforms and policies

Journal of Public Deliberation

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Raisio, Harri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VAASA   (Finland)

Author keywords

complexity; deliberative democracy; Finland; health care

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957737254     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Ackoff R.L. (1974). Redesigning the Future. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
2. Alban A. & Christianson T. (Eds.) (1995). The Nordic Lights: New Initiatives in Health Care Systems. Odense: Odense University Press.
3. Andersson J.O. (1993). Mistä uusi perusta hyvinvointivaltio? (From where the new foundation for welfare state?) In Hyvinvointivaltio ristiaallokossa (Welfare state in storm), Andersson J.O., Hautamäki A., Jallinoja R., Niiniluoto I. & Uusitalo H. (Eds). Sitra: Helsinki, 248-282.
4. APS (2007). Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective. Australian Public Service Commission Commonwealth of Australia.
5. Atlee T. (2003). The Tao of Democracy: Using co-intelligence to create a world that works for all. The Writes Collective: Cranston, Rhode Island.
6. Atlee T. (2004). Critiquing America Speaks" Process and Alternative Approaches as Paths to "Collective Intelligence". Group Facilitation 6: 93-101.
7. Atlee T. (2008). Co-intelligence, collective intelligence, and conscious evolution. In Collective intelligence: Creating a Prosperous World at Peace, Tovey M (Ed.); Earth Intelligence Network: Oakton, 5-14.
8. Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities (2008). Kuntalaisten kunta: Asukkaiden näkemyksiä kunnan toiminnasta ja päätöksenteosta (Municipality of inhabitants). Suomen Kuntaliitto: Helsinki.
9. Bennett P. & Smith S.J. (2007) Genetics, insurance and participation: How a Citizens' Jury reached its verdict. Social science & Medicine, 64(12), 2487-2498.
10. Bingham L.B., Nabatchi T. & O'Leary R. (2005). The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government. Public Administration Review 65(5), 547-558,
11. Blum J. & Manning N. (2009). Public managent reform across OECD countries. In Public Management and Governance, 2nd edition, Bovaird T. & Löffler E. (Eds). Routledge: London, New York, 41-58.
12. Briand M. (1999). Practical politics: five principles for a community that works. University of Illinois Press: Urbana.
13. Bruni R.A. Laupacis A., Levinson W. & Martin D.K. (2007). Public involvement in the priority setting activities of a wait time management initiative: a qualitative case study. BMC Health Services Research 7, 186-198.
14. van Bueren E.M., Klijn E-H., Koppenjan J.F.M. (2003). Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(2): 193-212.
15. Carson L. Sargant C. Blackadder J. (2004). Consult your community: A guide to running a youth jury. NSW Premier's Department: Sydney.
16. Chambers S. (2003). Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307-326.
17. Clarke M. & Stewart J. (2000). Handling the Wicked Issues. In Changing Practice in Health and Social Care, Davies C., Finlay L. & Bullman A. (Eds). Sage: London, 377-386.
18. Cohen J. & Fung A. (2004). The radical-democratic project. Swiss Political Science Review 10(4), 23-34.
19. Conklin J. (2005). Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. Wiley: New York.
20. Cohen J. (1991) Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Good polity normative analysis of the state, Hamlin A. & Pettit P. (Eds). Blackwell: Oxford.
21. Cohen J. (2009). Reflections on Deliberative Democracy. In Contemporary debates in political philosophy, Christiano T. & Christman J. (Eds). Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 247-263.
22. Cookson R. & Dolan P. (1999). Public views on health care rationing: a group discussion study. Health Policy 49, 63-74.
23. ECC (2007a). Finnish Citizens' Perspective on the Future of Europe: National Consultation in Finland, Tampere, 24-25.3. Available 28.6.2010 at http://www.ssc.fi/files/ECC/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf
24. ECC (2007b). Finnish Citizens' Perspective on the Future of Europe: Survey. Available 28.6.2010 at http://www.ssc.fi/files/ECC/resultat.pdf.
25. ECC (2009). Suomalaisten näkemyksiä Euroopan taloudellisesta ja sosiaalisesta tulevaisuudesta (Perspectives of Finnish people on economical and social future of Europe). Available 13.1.2010 at http://www.ssc.fi/files/ECC/ ECC2009/ECC200FINLAND-FinalReport-FI.pdf
26. Einhorn E.S. & Logue J. (2003). Modern Welfare States: Scandinavian Politics and Policy in the Global Age. Praeger: Westport.
27. Esping-Andersen G. (1996). After the Golden Age? Welfare State Dilemmas in a Global Economy. In Welfare States in transition: National Adaptions in Global Economies, Esping-Andersen G. (Ed.). SAGE Publications: London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 256-267
28. Esping-Andersen G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
29. Ferejohn J. (2008). Conclusion: the Citizens' Assembly model. In Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly, Warren M.E. & Pearse H. (Eds), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 192-213
30. Fishkin J. & Farrar C. (2005). Deliberative Polling: From Experiment to Community Resource. In The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century, Gastil J. & Levine P (Eds.); Jossey-Bass: San-Francisco, 68-79.
31. Fishkin J. S. (2009). When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy & Public Consultation. Oxford University Press: New York.
32. Forma P., Kallio J., Pirttilä J. & Uusitalo R. (2007). Kuinka hyvinvointivaltio pelastetaan? Tutkimus kansalaisten sosiaaliturvaa koskevista mielipiteistä ja valinnoista. (How to save welfare state). Sosiaali- ja terveysturvan tutkimuksia 89.
33. Fouke D. C. (2009). Democratic Deliberation and Moral Awareness. Journal of Public Deliberation 5(1).
34. Friedman W. (2006). Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Scope. Journal of Public Deliberation 2(1).
35. Fung A. (2003). Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences. The Journal of Political Philosophy 11(3): 338-367.
36. Fung A. (2005). Deliberation before Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World. Political theory 33(2): 397-419.
37. Funtowicz S.O. & Ravetz J.R. (1994). Uncertainty, Complexity and Post-Normal Science. Enviromental Toxicology and Chemistry 13(12), 1881-1885.
38. Gaylin W. (1993). Faulty diagnosis: Why Clinton's health-care plan won't cure what ails us. Harper's, October 1993, 57-64.
39. George V. (1996). The Future of the Welfare State. In European Welfare Policy, George V. & Taylor-Gooby P. (Eds.). Macmillan Press LTD: Houndmills, 1-30.
40. Glouberman S. & Zimmerman B. (2002). Complicated and Complex Systems: What Would Successful Reform of Medicare Look Like? Discussion paper no. 8. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada.
41. Gregory J., Hartz-Karp J. & Watson R. (2008). Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 5(16).
42. Grint K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of leadership. Human relations 58(11), 1467-1493
43. Grint K. (2010). The cuckoo clock syndrome: addicted to command, allergic to leadership. European Management Journal 28(4): 306-313.
44. Harmon M.M. & Mayer R.T. (1986). Organization Theory for Public Administration. Scott, Foresman and Company: Glenview, Illinois; London, England.
45. Hartz-Karp J. (2007). How and Why Deliberative Democracy Enables Co-Intelligence and Brings Wisdom to Governance. Journal of Public Deliberation 3(1).
46. Herne K. & Setälä M. (2005). Deliberatiivisen demokratian ihanteet ja kokeilut (Ideals and experiments of deliberative democracy). Politiikka 47(3): 175-188.
47. Hokkanen P. (2008). Kansalaisosallistuminen ympäristö vaikutusten arviointimenettelyssä (Citizen participation in evaluations of enviromental impacts). PhD Thesis, University of Tampere. Tampereen yliopistopaino: Tampere.
48. Hookins A. (2005). Developing a Questioning Model to Define Wicked Problems. PhD Thesis, University of South Australia, Division of Business & Enterprise.
49. Jallinoja R. (1993). Arvojen ambivalenssit (Ambivalences of the values). In Hyvinvointivaltio ristiaallokossa (Welfare state in storm), Andersson J.O., Hautamäki A., Jallinoja R., Niiniluoto I. & Uusitalo H. (Eds). Sitra: Helsinki, 17-58.
50. Jentoft S. & Chuenpagdee R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy. Article in Press.
51. Julkunen R. (2005). Hyvinvointivaltion uusi politiikka - Paul Piersonin historiallinen institutionalismi (New politics of welfare state). Teoksessa Hyvinvointivaltio: Suomen mallia analysoimassa, Saari J. (Ed.) Gaudeamus: Helsinki, 332-359.
52. Kajanoja J. (2007). Sosiaalipolitiikan näkökulma hyvinvointivaltion tulevaisuuteen (The perspective of social policy to the future of welfare state). Futura 1, 34-38.
53. Kenis P. (2006). Waiting lists in Dutch health care: an analysis from an organization theoretical perspective. Journal of Health Organization and Management 20(4), 294-308.
54. Kim S.Y.H., Wall I.F., Stanczyk A. & De Vries R. (2009). Assessing the Public's Views in Research Ethics Controversies: Deliberative Democracy and Bioethics as Natural Allies. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 4(4), 3-16.
55. King J.B. (1993). Learning to Solve the Right Problems: The Case of Nuclear Power in America. Journal of Business Ethics 12(2): 105-116.
56. Koskiaho B. (2008). Hyvinvointipalvelujen tavaratalossa (In the supermarket of welfare services). Vastapaino: Tampere.
57. Kosonen P. (1998). Pohjoismaidet mallit murroksessa (Nordic Models at a turning point). Vastapaino: Tampere.
58. Lammi M. & Rask M. (2009). Ilmastonmuutoksen hallintaa osallistuvan päätöksenteon avulla (Managing global warming with participatory decision-making.). Available 13.1.2010 at http://ktkblog.kuluttajatutkimus.fi/ ilmastoareena/wpcontent/uploads/2009/11/Lam-Rask-valm.pdf
59. Lazarus R. J. (2009). Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future. Cornell Law Review 94(5), 1153-1233.
60. Leighninger M. (2010). Teaching Democracy in Public Administration: Trends and Future Prospects. DDC & The Democracy Imperative.
61. Lenaghan J. (1999). Involving the public in rationing decisions: The experience of Citizens' Juries. Health policy 49: 45-61.
62. Levin K., Cashore B., Bernstein S. Auld G. (2009). Playing it Forward: Path Dependency, Progressive Incrementalism, and the "Super Wicked" Problem of Global Climate Change. Paper prepared for presentation to The Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions Congress, 10 - 12 March 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.
63. Mathews D. (1999). Politics for people: finding a responsible public voice. University of Illinois Press: Urbana.
64. Mihályi, P. (2008) The Rise and Fall of the New Health Insurance Act. In Health Insurance Reform in Hungary, Volume 2. Rise and fall, Mihályi P (Ed.). Europe ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
65. Ministry of Finance. (2001). Kuule kansalaista -hankkeen loppuraportti (Final report of the "Listen to citizen"-project). Helsinki.
66. Ministry of Justice (2010). Demokratiapolitiikan suuntaviivat (Trends for democracy policy). Publications of Ministry of Justice 14.
67. Morse R.S. (2006). Prophet of Participation: Mary Parker Follett and Public Participation in Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis 28(1), 1-32.
68. Murphy N.J. (2005). Citizen deliberation in setting health-care priorities. Health Expectation 8(2): 172-181.
69. Nelimarkka K. & Kauppinen T. (2004). Ihmisiin kohdistuvien vaikutusten arviointi Etelä- Suomen läänin vammaispoliittisessa ohjelmassa. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 69(3), 260-268.
70. NICE (2004). Scientific and Social Value Judgements. Available 24.4.2009: https://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/Pdf/boardmeeting/brdmay04item6.pdf.
71. Niemelä H., Pykälä P., Sullström R. & Vanne R. (2007). Suomalaisen sosiaaliturvan kehitys ja kansalaisen elinvaiheet (The development of Finnish social security and the life cycles of citizens). Kelan tutkimusosasto: Helsinki.
72. Niva M. & Rask M. (2009). CIVISTI. Kansalaisten tulevaisuusvisiot - Suomi (Citizens' visions on the future). Available13.1.2010 at http://www.civisti.org/files/Kansalaisten-tulevaisuusvisiot-Suomi-v2.pdf
73. OECD (2001). Citizens as partners: OECD handbook on information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. OECD publications.
74. Pacanowsky M. (1995). Team Tools for Wicked Problems. Organizational Dynamics 23(3): 36-52.
75. Parkinson J. (2004). Why Deliberate? The Encounter Between Deliberation and New Public Managers. Public Administration 82(2), 377-395.
76. Raisio H. (2009a). Health care reform planners and wicked problems: Is the wickedness of the problems taken seriously or is it even noticed at all? Journal of Health Organization and Management 23(5), 477-493.
77. Raisio H. (2009b). Deliberating Together: Public Deliberation in the Context of the Hungarian Health Insurance Reform. Society and Economy Journal of the Corvinus University of Budapest 31(2), 253-269.
78. Raisio H. (2009c). Kiinnostaako kansalaisia osallistua terveydenhuollon hankkeiden ja terveyspolitiikan suunnitteluun? (Are citizens interested to participate in the planning of health care reforms and policies?) Results of a citizens' survey published in otakantaa.fi internet forum.
79. Raisio H., Vartiainen P., Ersek K. & Gulacsi L. (2009). Health Economics and Deliberative Democracy in Health Care Priority Setting: "Symbiosis" of Technocratic and Democratic Values. Paper presented in "Governing good and governing well": The first global dialogue on ethical and effective governance, 28-30 MAY 2009, Amsterdam
80. Ralston S. J. (2008). Intelligently Designing Deliberative Health Care Forums: Dewey's Metaphysics, Cognitive Science and a Brazilian example. Dupont Summit 2008.
81. Randma-Liiv T. (2008). New Public Management Versus the Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1(2), 69-81
82. Rask M., Laihonen M., Lammi M. & Saastamoinen M. (2009). World Wide-Views - kansalaisten viestit Kööpenhaminan ilmastoneuvottelijoille. Suomen kansalaispaneelin näkemykset (Views of Finnish citizen panel). Kuluttajantutkimuskeskus: Helsinki.
83. Rawlins M.D. & Culyer A.J. (2004). National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgement. BMJ 329: 224-227.
84. Rawlins M.D. (2005). Phamacopolitics and deliberative democracy. Clinical Medicine 5(5): 471-475.
85. Rittel H. & Webber M. (1973). Dilemmas in General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4(2): 155-169.
86. Roberts N. (2000). Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution. International Public Management Review - electronic Journal 1(1), 1-19.
87. Roberts N. (2004). Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation. American Review of Public Administration 34(4), 315-353.
88. Rowe G. & Frewer L.J. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science Technology & Human Values 25(3): 3-29.
89. Ruokanen T. (2004). Suomen menestyksen eväät: Tiekartta tulevaisuuteen (The provisions for the success of Finland: A roadmap to the future). EVA 2004.
90. Sanders L.M. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory 25(3): 347-376.
91. Setälä M., Grönlund K. & Herne K. (2007). Kohti valistunutta kansalaismielipidettä: Kansalaiskeskustelukokeilu Turussa syksyllä 2006 (Towards an englightened citizen opinion: Deliberative citizen discussion in Turku in Fall 2006). Oikeus 36(2): 231-240.
92. Tenbensel T. (2002). Interpreting public input into priority-setting: the role of mediating institutions. Health policy 62, 173-194,
93. Teperi J. Porter M.E. Vuorenkoski L. & Baron J.F. (2009). The Finnish Health Care System: A Value-Based Perspective. Sitra reports 82.
94. Thacher D. (2009). The cognitive Foundations of Humanistic Governance. International Public Management Journal 12(2), 261-286.
95. Toiviainen H. (2005). Potilasjärjestöt (Patient organizations). Publications of Finland's Slot Machine Association 15, Helsinki.
96. Tuomi J. & Sarajärvi A. (2002). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi (Qualitative research and content analysis). Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy: Jyväskylä.
97. Vartiainen P. (2005). Wicked Health Care Issues: An Analysis of Finnish and Swedish Health Care Reforms. Advances in Health Care Management: International Health Care Management 5: 163-186
98. Wallgren T. (2007). Filosofian näkökulma hyvinvointivaltion tulevaisuuteen (Perspective of the philosophy to the future of the welfare state). Future 1: 5-12.
99. Warren M.E. (2008). Citizen representatives. In Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly, Warren M.E. & Pearse H. (Eds), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 50-69.
100. Weber E. P. & Khademian A. M. (2008). Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings. Public Administration Review, March/April, 334-349.
101. Weick K.E. & Roberts K.H. (1993). Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 38(3): 357-381.
102. Yankelovich D. (1991). Coming to public judgment: making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse University Press: Syracuse.
103. Yankelovich D. (1995). The debate that wasn't: The public and the Clinton plan. Health Affairs 14(1): 7-23.
104. Young I.M. (2003). Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. In Debating Deliberative Democracy, Fishkin J. & Laslett P. (Eds). Blackwell Publishing: Oxford. 102-120.