Social Networks as Trojan Horses to Challenge the Dominance of Existing Hierarchies: Knowledge and Learning in theWater Governance of Volos, Greece

Water Resources Management

Volumn 24, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 3853-3870

  Dimadama, Zefi ^a   Zikos, Dimitrios ^b  

^a PANTEION UNIVERSITY   (Greece)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Informal social networks; Knowledge; Learning; Participation; Water governance

Indexed keywords

INFORMAL SOCIAL NETWORKS; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; PARTICIPATION; WATER GOVERNANCE;

DECISION MAKING; PRIVATIZATION; PROJECTILES; SEWAGE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER SUPPLY;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

DECISION MAKING; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; LEARNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; METROPOLITAN AREA; SOCIAL NETWORK; WATER INDUSTRY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING;

GREECE; MAGNESIA; THESSALY; VOLOS;

EQUIDAE;

EID: 77957726958     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-010-9637-5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Berger T, Birner R, Díaz J, McCarthy N, Wittmer H (2007) Capturing the complexity of water uses and water users within a multi-agent framework. Water Resour Manag 21: 129-148.
2. Dietz T, Stern PC (ed) (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Panel on public participation in environmental assessment and decision making, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
3. Dimadama Z (2008) Economy, development and environment. Theoretical approaches and sustainable development policies. Papazisis Press, Athens.
4. European Commission (2002a) European governance: a white paper, Brussels. http://ec. europa. eu/governance/docs/index_en. htm. Accessed 12 December 2008.
5. European Commission (2002b) Guidance on public participation in relation to the water framework directive: active involvement, consultation, and public access to information. Guidance document on public participation. http://www. eau2015-rhin-meuse. fr/fr/ressources/documents/guide_participation-public. pdf. Accessed 1 December 2008.
6. Friedrich D (2007) Old wine in new bottles? The actual and potential contribution of civil society organizations to democratic governance in Europe, RECON working paper 2007/08. http://www. unizar. es/euroconstitucion/Treaties/Library%20(Since%20June%202007/Friedrich%202007. pdf. Accessed 22 September 2009.
7. Getimis P, Dimadama Z (2003) Environmental management and policies: the Greek case studies. In: Heinelt H, Smith R (ed) Sustainability, innovation and participatory governance. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 165-192.
8. Getimis P, Bithas K, Zikos D (2001) Key actors, institutional framework and participatory procedures, for the Sustainable use of water in Attica-basin. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on environmental science and technology, Syros: University of Aegean, pp 243-252. http://www. zikos. eu/hydrorama2002final. pdf. Accessed 05 January 2010.
9. Hau M, Heinelt H (2005) How to achieve governability at the local level? In: Hau M, Heinelt H, Stewart M (eds) Urban governance and democracy. Routledge, London, pp 12-35.
10. Heinelt H, Niederhafner St (2008) Cities and organized interest intermediation in the EU multi-level system. Eur Urban Reg Stud 15: 173-187.
11. Heinelt H, Malek T, Smith R, Töller A (2001) European union environment policy and new forms of governance. Ashgate, Aldershot.
12. Heinelt H, Getimis P, Kafkalas G, Smith R, Swyngedouw E (2002) Participatory governance in multi level context. Concepts and experience. Leske+Budrich, Opladen.
13. Heinelt H, Sweeting D, Getimis P (2005) Legitimacy and urban governance: a cross-national comparative study. Routledge, London.
14. Intermediaries (2005) New intermediary services and the transformation of urban water supply and wastewater disposal systems in Europe, EVK1-CT-2002-00115, carried out in the 5th Framework Research and Technological Development Program of the Commission of the European Communities, coordinated by Timothy Moss, Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner, Germany. http://orbit. dtu. dk/All. external?recid=185345. Accessed 22 June 2008.
15. Lewis D, Ehsan K (1996) Guidelines towards promoting 'active' inter-agency partnerships in sustainable developments: lessons from an aquaculture project in Bangladesh. Unpublished report to the UK Overseas Development Administration, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London.
16. Lister S (1998) Power in partnership? An analysis of an NGO's relationships with its partners. CVO International Working Paper Number 5. http://www. lse. ac. uk/collections/CCS/pdf/IWP/int-work-paper5. pdf. Accessed 20 May 2009.
17. Matthiesen UB, Bürkner HJ (2004) Wissensmilieus-Zur sozialen Konstruktion und analytischen Rekonstruktion eines neuen Sozialraum-Typus In: Matthiesen UB (ed) Stadtregion und Wissen. Analysen und Plädoyers für eine wissensbasierte Stadtpolitik, Wiesbaden, pp 65-89.
18. Mayntz R (1993) Governing failures and the problem of governability: some comments on a theoretical paradigm. In: Kooiman J (ed) In modern governance: new government-society interactions. Sage, London, pp 45-67.
19. Medd W, Marvin E (2008) Making water work: intermediating between regional strategy and local practice. Environ Plann D Soc Space 26(2): 280-299.
20. Medd W, Moss T, Hoffman B, Beveridge R (2004) Conceptualisation of intermediaries: guidance papers, WP3 guidance internal document of "Intermediary Services and the transformation of urban water supply and wastewater disposal systems in Europe" research project (EVK1-CT- 2002-00115).
21. Mostert E (2003) Public participation and the European water framework directive: a framework for analysis, February 2003, RBA Centre, Delft, University of Technology. http://www. harmonicop. uni-osnabrueck. de/_files/_down/HarmoniCOPinception. pdf. Accessed 1 May 2009.
22. Mostert E, Pahl-WostlC (2003) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2): 5-12.
23. Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transition towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manag 21(1): 49-62.
24. PRB (2007) Pilot river basin activity report phase II: 2005-2006 water framework directive implementation pilot activities-key challenges and recommendations from the pilot river basins. Report prepared by pilot river basins, European Commission, DG Environment and the Joint Research Centre, 13 June 2007. http://www. enmar. org/sites/home/news/download/2007-06-13_report_pilot_river_basins_en. pdf. Accessed 10 February 2010.
25. Rauschmayer F, Wittmer H, Paavola J (2007) Multi-level governance of natural resources: tools and processes for water and biodiversity governance in Europe-a European research and training network, UFZ discussion paper, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, GoverNat 1, March 2007, Leipzig. http://www. governat. eu/files/files/ufz_diskussion_papers. pdf. Accessed 18 February 2010.
26. Rauschmayer F, Berghöfer A, Omann I, Zikos D (2009) Examining processes or outcomes? Evaluation concepts in European Governance of natural resources. Environmental Policy and Governance 19(3): 159-173.
27. Schmitter PC (2002) Participatory governance arrangements: is there any reason to expect it will achieve; sustainable and innovation policies in a multilevel context?' In: Crote J, Gbikpi B (ed) Participatory governance: political and social implications. Leske+Budrich, Opladen, pp 51-70.
28. Timmermans J (2009) Interactive actor analysis for rural water management in The Netherlands: an application of the transactional approach. Water Resour Manag 23: 1211-1236.
29. Zikos D, Bithas K (2006) The case of a "weak water governance model: Athens, Greece. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IASME/WSEAS international conference on water resources, hydraulics and hydrology. WSEAS, Chalkida, pp 161-166, May 11-13, 2006. http://zikos. 110mb. com/516-372. pdf. Accessed 17 February 2010.