Evidence-centered assessment design as a foundation for achievement-level descriptor development and for standard setting

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 342-357

  Plake, Barbara S ^a   Huff, Kristen ^b   Reshetar, Rosemary ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b The College Board   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957712236     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08957347.2010.510964     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bejar, I. I., Braun, H. I., & Tannenbaum, R. J. (2007). A prospective, progressive, and predictive approach to standard setting. In R. W. Lissitz, Assessing and modeling cognitive development in school: Intellectual growth and standard setting (pp. 1-30). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
2. Cizek, G. J. (2006). Standard setting. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 225-258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Ewing, M., Packman, S., Hamen, C., & Clark Thurber, A. (2010/this issue). Representing targets of measurement within evidence-centered design. Applied Measurement in Education.
4. Hendrickson, A., Huff, K., & Luecht, R. M. (2010/this issue). Claims, evidence, and achievementlevel descriptors as a foundation for item design and test specifications. Applied Measurement in Education.
5. Huff, K., Steinberg, L., & Matts, T. (2010/this issue). The promises and challenges of implementing evidence-centered design in large-scale assessment. Applied Measurement in Education.
6. Kane, M. (1994). Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores. Review of Educational Research, 64, 425-461.
7. Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement, 4th edition (pp. 17-64). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
8. Mislevy, R. J., & Risonscente, M. M (2005). Evidence-centered design: Lays, structures, and terminology (PADI Technical Report 9). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International and University of Maryland.
9. Mitzel, H. C., Lewis, D. M., Patz, R. J., & Green, D. R. (2001). The Bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 249-281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. No Child Left Behind (2001). Elementary and Secondary Education Act. U.S. Congress.
11. Plake, B. S., Hambleton, R. K., & Jaeger, R. M. (1997). A new standard-setting method for performance assessments: The dominant profile judgment method and some field test results. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 400-412.
12. Risconscente, M. M., Mislevy, R. J., & Hamel, L. (2005). Introduction to PADI task templates (PAFI Technical Report 3). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International and University of Maryland.
13. Steinberg, L. S., Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., Baird, A. B., Cahallan, C., DiBello, L. V., et al. (2003). Introduction to the Biomass project: An illustration of evidence-centered assessment design and delivery capability (CRESST Technical Report 609). Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, CRESST, UCLA.