Auditory adaptation in vocal affect perception

Cognition

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 217-223

  Bestelmeyer, Patricia E G ^a   Rouger, Julien ^b   DeBruine, Lisa M ^c   Belin, Pascal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory adaptation; Emotion; Vocal affect; Voice perception

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AFFECT; ANGER; ARTICLE; FEAR; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOCALIZATION; VOICE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AFFECT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; VOICE;

EID: 77957686862     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ades A.E. New approaches to language mechanisms. Adapting the Property Detectors for Speech Perception 1976, 55-107. North-Holland, Amsterdam. R.J. Wales, E. Walker (Eds.).
2. Belin P., Fecteau S., Bédard C. Thinking the voice: Neural correlates of voice perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:129-135.
3. Belin P., Fillion-Bilodeau S., Gosselin F. The montreal affective voices: A validated set of nonverbal affect bursts for research on auditory affective processing. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:531-539.
4. Belin P., Zatorre R.J. Adaptation to speaker's voice in right anterior temporal lobe. Neuroreport 2003, 14:2105-2109.
5. Belin P., Zatorre R.J., Lafaille P., Ahad P., Pike B. Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature 2000, 403:309-312.
6. Bestelmeyer P.E.G., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M., Little A.C., Perrett D.I., Schneider A., et al. Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition 2008, 107:353-365.
7. Bestelmeyer P.E.G., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M., Little A.C., Welling L.L.M. Face aftereffects demonstrate interdependent processing of expression and sex and of expression and race. Visual Cognition 2010, 18:255-274.
8. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
9. Bruce V., Young A. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1986, 77:305-327.
10. Calder A.J., Young A.W., Perrett D.I., Etcoff N.L., Rowland D. Categorical perception of morphed facial expressions. Visual Cognition 1996, 3:81-117.
11. Elfenbein H.A., Ambady N. On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2002, 128:203-235.
12. Ethofer T., De Ville D.V., Scherer K., Vuilleumier P. Decoding of emotional information in voice-sensitive cortices. Current Biology 2009, 19:1028-1033.
13. Ethofer T., Kreifelts B., Wiethoff S., Wolf J., Grodd W., Vuilleumier P., et al. Differential influences of emotion, task, and novelty on brain regions underlying the processing of speech melody. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:1255-1268.
14. Fox C.J., Barton J.J.S. What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representation o expression in the human visual system. Brain Research 2007, 1127:80-89.
15. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
16. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:223-233.
17. Jenkins R., Beaver J.D., Calder A.J. I thought you were looking at me! Direction-specific aftereffects in gaze perception. Psychological Science 2006, 17:506-514.
18. Kawahara, H., Matsui, H. (2003). Auditory morphing based on an elastic perceptual distance metric in an interference-free time-frequency representation. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, Vol. 1, pp. 256-259.
19. Kloth N., Schweinberger S.R. The temporal decay of eye gaze adaptation effects. Journal of Vision 2008, 8:1-11.
20. Laukka P. Categorical perception of vocal expressions. Emotion 2005, 5:277-295.
21. Leitman D.I., Wolf D.H., Ragland J.D., Laukka P., Loughead J., Valdez J.N., et al. " It's not what you say, but how you say it": A reciprocal temporo-frontal network for affective prosody. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4:4-19.
22. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level after effects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:89-94.
23. Leopold D.A., Rhodes G., Müller K.-M., Jefferey L. The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society 2005, 272:897-904.
24. Little A.C., DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C. Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 2005, 272:2283-2287.
25. Mullennix J.W., Johnson K.A., TopcuDurgun M., Farnsworth L.M. The perceptual representation of voice gender. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 98:3080-3095.
26. Nygaard L.C., Sommers M.S., Pisoni D.B. Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science 1994, 5:42-46.
27. Pelli D.G. The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
28. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Clifford C.W.G., Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 2003, 14:558-566.
29. Sawusch J.R. Peripheral and central processes in selective adaptation of place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1977, 62:738-750.
30. Schweinberger S.R., Casper C., Hauthal N., Kaufmann J.M., Kawahara H., Kloth N., et al. Auditory adaptation in voice perception. Current Biology 2008, 18:684-688.
31. Wallbott H., Scherer K.R. How universal and specific is emotional experience. Social Science Information 1986, 26:763-795.
32. Watson T.L., Clifford C.W.G. Pulling faces: An investigation of the face, distortion aftereffect. Perception 2003, 32:1109-1116.
33. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 2004, 428:557-561.
34. Webster M.A., MacLin O.H. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:647-653.
35. Wildgruber D., Hertrich I., Riecker A., Erb M., Anders S., Grodd W., et al. Distinct frontal regions subserve evaluation of linguistic and emotional aspects of speech intonation. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14:1384-1389.
36. Winston J.S., Henson R.N.A., Fine-Goulden M.R., Dolan R.J. FMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004, 92:1830-1839.
37. Zhao L., Chubb C. The size-tuning of the face, distortion after-effect. Vision Research 2001, 41:2979-2994.