Effect of manure application on the chemical composition and nutritive value of rangeland hay

Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Volumn 9, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 1852-1857

  Ayan, Ilknur ^a   Mut, Hanife ^b   Onal Asci, Ozlem ^c   Basaran, Ugur ^a   Acar, Zeki ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BOZOK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c ORDU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Chemical composition; Manure aplication rates and time; Nutritive value; Rangeland; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957686100     PISSN: 16805593     EISSN: 1993601X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2010.1852.1857     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anonymous, 2008. Agriculture: Crop production statistics. Agricultural Land and Forest Area. Turkish Statistical Instutite, Turkey, http://www.turkstat.gov. tr/PreTablo.do?tb_id=45&ust_id=53.
2. Assefa, G. and I. Ledin, 2001. Effect of variety, soil type and fertilizer on the establishment, growth, forage yield, quality and voluntary intake by cattle of oats and vetches cultivated in pure stands and mixtures. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 92: 95-111.
3. Ayan, I., Z. Acar, H. Mut, U. Basaran and O. Asci, 2006. Morphological, chemical and nutritional properties of forage plants in a natural rangeland in Turkey. Bangladeshi. Bot, 35: 133-142.
4. Aydin, I. and F. Uzun, 2008. Potential decrease of grass te tarry risk in rang elands combining N and K fertilization with MgO treatments. Europ. J. Agronomy, 29: 33-37.
5. Aydin, I. and F. Uzun, 2005. Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization of rangelands affects yield, forage quality and the botanical composition. Eur. J. Agron., 23: 8-14.
6. Caballero, R., E.L. Goicoechea and PJ. Hernaiz, 1995. Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of common vetch. Field Crops Res., 41: 135-140.
7. Cakmakci, S., B. Aydinoglu, M. Arslan, Y. Ozyigit, M. Tetik and M. Bilgen, 2004. Determination of optimum fall sowing date for some forage species in terms of forage yield of rangelands in the continental climate zones. J. Faculty Agnc, 17: 43-47.
8. Firincioglu, H.K., L. Unas, E.J. Lamont and S. Christiansen, 1996. Improvement and management of shared village rang eland: Multi-diciplinary approach to develop the basic model (i. Identification surveys). Proceedings of the 3th Grassland and Forage Congress, (GFC'96), Erzurum, Turkey, 75-82.
9. Frame, I., 1992. Improved Grassland Management. Farming Press Books, Ipswich.
10. Georgievskii, V.I., 1982. The Physiological Role of Macro Elements. In: Mineral Nutrition of Animals, Georgievsku, V.I., B.N. Annenkov and V.T. Samokhin (Eds.). Butterworth, London, ISBN: 0408107707, pp: 257-271.
11. Horrocks, R.D. and J.F. Vallentine, 1999. Harvested Forages. Academic Press, London, UK.
12. lacobsen, D.R., R.W. Hemken, R.S. Buton and R.H. Hatton, 1972. Mineral nutrition, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and potassium interrelationships. J. Dairy Sci., 55: 935-944.
13. lefferson, P.G., H.F. Mayland, K.H. Asay and J.D. Berdahl, 2001. Variation in mineral concentration and grass tetany potential among Russian Wild rye accessions. Crop Sci., 41: 543-548.
14. Johnson, J. and D. Eckert, 1995. Best management Practices: Land Application of Animal Manure. Ohio State University Extension Publication, Ohio.
15. Lithourgidis, A.S., IB. Vasilakoglou, K.V. Dhima, C.A. Dordas and M.D. Yiakoulaki, 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Res., 99: 106-113.
16. Minson, D.J., 1990. Forages in Ruminant Nutriiton. Academic Press, New York, pp: 350.
17. Mugerwa, S., D. Mpairwe, E.N. Sabiiti, D. Mutetikka, G.H. Kiwuwa, E. Zziwa andD. Peden, 2008. Effect of cattle manure and reseeding on pasture productivity. CPWF Second International Forum on Water and Food, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Nov. 10-14.
18. Mut, H., 2009. Determination of Effectiveness of Different Improvement Methods on a Plowed and abondoned Pasture. Ph.D. Thesis, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkiye.
19. Mut, Z., I. Ayan and H. Mut, 2006. Evaluation of forage yield and quality at two phenological stages of triticale genotypes and other cereals grown under rainfed conditions. Bangladesh J. Bot, 35: 45-53.
20. National Research Council, 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. 6th Edn., National Acad. Sci., Washington DC.
21. National Research Council, 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th Edn., National Academy of Science, Washington DC.
22. Ocak, N., M.A. Cam and M. Kuran, 2006. The influence of pre- and postmating protein supplementation on reproductive performance in ewes maintained on rangeland Small Ruminant Res., 64: 16-21.
23. Reid, R.L. and G.A., Jung, 1974.. Effects of Elements other than Nitrogen on the Nutritive Value of Forage. In: Forage Fertilization, Mays, D.A. (Ed.). ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, pp: 395.
24. Tajeda, R., L.R. Mcdowell, F.G. Martin and J.H. Conrad, 1985. Mineral element analyses of various tropical forages in guatemala and their relationship to soil concentrations. Nut. Rep. Int., 32: 313-324.
25. Tetik, M., H. Saribasak, S. Cakmakci, M. Bilgen and B. Aydinoglu, 2001. Determination of pasture improvement method using in Kemer-Burdur District. T.C. Ministry of Forestry, Western Mediterranean Forestry Reseach Directorate, Technical Bulletin, No. 16, Antalya.
26. Uzun, F., 2010. Changes in hay yield and quality of bulbous barley at different phenological stages. Turk. J. Agnc.,34: 1-9.
27. Uzun, F., S. Ugur and M. Sulak, 2002. Yield, nutritional and chemical properties of some sorghum x sudan grass hybrids (Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench x Sorghum sudanense Stapf.). J. Anim. Vet. Advances, 8: 1602-1608.