Discriminating dysarthria type from envelope modulation spectra research note

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1246-1255

  Liss, Julie M ^a   LeGendre, Sue ^b   Lotto, Andrew J ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Dysarthria; Envelope modulation spectra

Indexed keywords

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; ARTICLE; ATAXIA; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DYSARTHRIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUNTINGTON CHOREA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PARKINSON DISEASE; PERIODICITY; PHONETICS; REFERENCE VALUE; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; TIME;

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; ATAXIA; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DYSARTHRIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUNTINGTON DISEASE; MALE; PARKINSON DISEASE; PERIODICITY; PHONETICS; REFERENCE VALUES; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION TESTS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77957593405     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0121)     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arai, T., & Greenberg, S. (1997). The temporal properties of spoken Japanese are similar to those of English. Proceedings of Eurospeech, Rhodes, Greece, 2, 1011-1114.
2. Crouzet, O., & Ainsworth, W. A. (2001, September). On the various influences of envelope information on the perception of speech in adverse conditions: An analysis of betweenchannel envelope correlation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Consistent and Reliable Cues for Sound Analysis, Aalborg, Denmark.
3. Cummins, F., & Port, R. (1998). Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 145-171.
4. Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for delta C. In P. Karnowski & I. Szigeti (Eds.), Language and language processing: Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium, Piliscsaba 2003 (pp. 231-241). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
5. Drullman, R., Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1994). Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1053-1064. (Pubitemid 24056370)
6. Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In N. Warner & C. Gussenhoven (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 515-546). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. Greenberg, S., Arai, T., & Grant, K. (2006). The role of temporal dynamics in understanding spoken language. In P. Divenyi, K. Vicsi, & G. Meyer (Eds.), Dynamics of speech production and perception (Vol. 374, pp. 171-193). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
8. Greenwood, D. D. (1961). Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33 (10), 1344-1356.
9. Houtgast, T., & Steeneken, J. M. (1985). A review of the mtf concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77 (3), 1069-1077.
10. Kent, R. D., & Kim, Y. J. (2003). Toward an acoustic typology of motor speech disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17 (6), 427-445.
11. Liss, J. M., Spitzer, S., Caviness, J. N., Adler, C., & Edwards, B. (1998). Syllabic strength and lexical boundary decisions in the perception of hypokinetic dysarthric speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104 (4), 2457-2566.
12. Liss, J. M., Spitzer, S. M., Caviness, J. N., Adler, C., & Edwards, B. (2000). Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107 (6), 3415-3424.
13. Liss, J. M., White, L., Mattys, S. L., Lansford, K., Lotto, A. J., Spitzer, S., & Caviness, J. N. (2009). Quantifying speech rhythm deficits in the dysarthrias. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52 (5), 1334-1352.
14. Low, E. L., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (2000). Quantitative characterisations of speech rhythm: "Syllable-timing" in Singapore English. Language and Speech, 43, 377-401.
15. Milenkovic, P. (2004). TF32 [Computer software]. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
16. Moore, B. C. J., & Glasberg, B. R. (1996). A revision of Zwicker's loudness model. Acta Acustica, 82, 335-345.
17. Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Towards an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 756-766.
18. Peterson, G., & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693-703.
19. Plomp, R. (1983). The role of modulation in hearing. In R. Klinke (Ed.), Hearing: Physiological bases and psychophysics (pp. 270-275). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
20. Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73 (3), 265-292.
21. Shoji, K., Regenbogen, E., Daw Yu, J., & Blaugrund, S. M. (1991). High-frequency components of normal voice. Journal of Voice, 5 (1), 29-35.
22. Sound Forge [Software]. (2004). Middleton, WI: Sony Creative Software.
23. Spitzer, S., Liss, J., & Mattys, S. (2007). Acoustic cues to lexical segmentation: A study of resynthesized speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122 (6), 3678-3687.
24. Tilsen, S., & Johnson, K. (2008). Low-frequency Fourier analysis of speech rhythm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124 (2), EL34-EL39.
25. Valencia, N., Mendoza, L., Mateo, R, & Carballo, G. (1994). High-frequency components of normal and dysphonic voices. Journal of Voice, 8 (2), 157-162.
26. White, L., & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35 (4), 501-522.