Elementary Process Theory: A formal axiomatic system with a potential application as a foundational framework for physics supporting gravitational repulsion of matter and antimatter

Annalen der Physik (Leipzig)

Volumn 522, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 699-738

  Cabbolet, Marcoen J T F ^a,b  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b KHARKOV INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY   (Ukraine)

Author keywords

Dynamics; Foundations of physics; Gravitational repulsion; Individual processes

Indexed keywords

AXIOMATIC SYSTEM; EARTH'S GRAVITATIONAL FIELD; ELEMENTARY PROCESS; GENERAL RELATIVITY; GRAVITATIONAL REPULSION; INDIVIDUAL PROCESSES; LAWS OF PHYSICS; LOGICAL AXIOMS; MODERN PHYSICS; PHYSICAL REALITY; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; QUANTUM MECHANICS; REAL-WORLD PROBLEM; REPULSION FUNCTIONS; RESEARCH PROGRAMS; REST MASS;

FORMAL LOGIC; GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS; PROGRAM INTERPRETERS; QUANTUM THEORY; RELATIVITY;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 77957586524     PISSN: 00033804     EISSN: 15213889     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/andp.201000063     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. M.M. Nieto and T. Goldman, Phys. Rep. 205, 221-281 (1991).
2. M.M. Nieto and T. Goldman, Phys. Rep. 216, 343 (Erratum) (1991)
3. G. Chardin and J.-M. Rax, Phys. Lett. B 282, 256-262 (1992).
4. M. Fischler, J. Lykken, and T. Roberts, Fermilab Report FERMILAB-FN-0822-CD-T, 13 pp., arXiv: 0808.3929v1 [hep-tp], (2008).
5. P. Morrison, Am. J. Phys. 26, 358-368 (1958).
6. L. I. Schiff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1, 254-255 (1958).
7. L. I. Schiff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 69-80 (1959).
8. M. L. Good, Phys. Rev. 121, 311-313 (1961).
9. M. Sachs, Einstein versus Bohr: the Continuing Controversies in Physics (Open Court, New York, 1988).
10. C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
11. C.M. Will, Living Rev. Relativ. 4(4) (2001).
12. C.A. Fuchs and A. Peres, Phys. Today 53(3), 70 (2000).
13. P. Pérez and A. Rosowsky, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 545, 20-30 (2005).
14. W. Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy, Modern Classics Edition (HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 2007) p. 67.
15. P.R. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 76, 749-759 (1949).
16. J.R. Shoenfield, Mathematical Logic (AK Peters Ltd., Natick, 2001), p. 22.
17. R.M. Santilli, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14(10), 2205-2238 (1999).
18. D. van Dantzig, Erkenntnis 7(1), 142-146 (1937).
19. J. Bell, Physics 1(3), 195-200 (1964).
20. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166-179 (1952).
21. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 180-193 (1952).
22. F.W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington, and C.R. Davidson, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 220, 291-333 (1920).
23. E. Hubble, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 15(3), 168-173 (1929).
24. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, Phys. Rev. D 34(2), 470-491 (1986).
25. M. J. T. F. Cabbolet and H.C.M. de Swart, Set Matrix Theory as a Physically Motivated Generalization of Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory, submitted for publication.
26. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton Universitry Press, Princeton, 1955), pp. 3-4.
27. S. S. Sannikov, Russ. Phys. J. 39(9), 767-775 (1996).
28. H. von Helmholtz, Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (Hamburg, Leipzig, 1896); excerpt translated in Dutch language in
29. W. M. Weber, De Meningen van the Filosofen, Deel I, (Uitgeverij Konstapel, Groningen, 1981), pp. 244-245.
30. S. S. Sannikov, Theor. Math. Phys. 34, 21-29 (1978).
31. C. Misner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1071-1074 (1969).
32. A. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).
33. W. E. Pauli, Address to Group on Radioactivity, Tübingen, Germany, 1930 (unpublished letter).
34. G. Galileo, Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo (Florence, Italy, 1632); discussed in
35. B. F. Schutz, A First Course in General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990), p. 2.
36. A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 49, 769-822 (1916).
37. W. de Sitter, Algemeen Handelsblad, July the 9th (1930); discussed in
38. P. J. E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993), p. 81.