Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: A case study using primary open-angle glaucoma

Ophthalmology

Volumn 117, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1937-1945

  Li, Tianjing ^a   Ervin, Ann Margret ^a   Scherer, Roberta ^a   Jampel, Henry ^b   Dickersin, Kay ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DELPHI STUDY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; THEORETICAL MODEL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OPHTHALMOLOGY; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77957576740     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. H.C. Sox, and S. Greenfield Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine Ann Intern Med 151 2009 203 205
2. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 111 USC. Public Law 111-5. Feb 17, 2009:177 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ5/pdf/PLAW-111publ5. pdf Accessed April 21, 2010
3. E.S. Fisher, D.E. Wennberg, and T.A. Stukel The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care Ann Intern Med 138 2003 273 287
4. E.S. Fisher, D.E. Wennberg, and T.A. Stukel The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care Ann Intern Med 138 2003 288 298
5. G.H. Guyatt, R.B. Haynes, R.Z. Jaeschke Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' guides to the medical literature: XXV Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users' guides to patient care JAMA 284 2000 1290 1296
6. Institute of Medicine Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research 2009 National Academies Pr Washington, DC http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/ComparativeEffectivenessResearchPriorities.aspx. Accessed: August 12, 2010
7. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality The Effective Health Care Program: How are research topics chosen? http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ index.cfm/submit-a-suggestion-for-research/how-are-research-topics-chosen/ Accessed October 29, 2009
8. Committee on Reviewing Evidence to Identify Highly Effective Clinical Services, Board on Health Care Services J. Eden, Knowing What Works in Health Care: A Roadmap for the Nation 2008 National Academies Press Washington, DC 57 80
9. H.Z. Noorani, D.R. Husereau, R. Boudreau, and B. Skidmore Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches Int J Technol Assess Health Care 23 2007 310 315
10. D.J. Cook, N.L. Greengold, A.G. Ellrodt, and S.R. Weingarten The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines Ann Intern Med 127 1997 210 216
11. S.H. Woolf, R. Grol, and A. Hutchinson Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines BMJ 318 1999 527 530
12. F.L. Ferris III, and J.M. Tielsch Blindness and visual impairment: a public health issue for the future as well as today Arch Ophthalmol 122 2004 451 452
13. Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States Arch Ophthalmol 122 2004 532 538
14. H.A. Quigley Number of people with glaucoma worldwide Br J Ophthalmol 80 1996 389 393
15. H.A. Quigley, and A.T. Broman The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020 Br J Ophthalmol 90 2006 262 267
16. A. Sommer, R.L. Abbott, F. Lum, and H.D. Hoskins Jr PPPstwenty years and counting Ophthalmology 115 2008 2125 2126
17. J.P. Higgins, S. Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 Part 2. General Methods for Cochrane Reviews. Chapter 5. Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. Chapter 9. Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-analyses 2009 Cochrane Collaboration http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/ Accessed April 21, 2010
18. Equator Network The SPIRIT Initiative: defining standard protocol items for randomized trials Executive Summary (April, 2010) http://www.equator- network.org/resource-centre/library-of-health-research-reporting/ reporting-guidelines-under-development/ Accessed June 30, 2010
19. D.J. Lunn, A. Thomas, N. Best, and D. Spiegelhalter WinBUGS-a Bayesian modeling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility Stat Comput 10 2000 325 337
20. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Solicitation for nominations for new primary and secondary health topics to be considered for review by the United States Preventive Services Task Force FR Doc 06-612. Fed Reg. January 24, 2006;71:384950 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/06-612.htm Accessed April 21, 2010
21. S.H. Woolf, C.G. DiGuiseppi, D. Atkins, and D.B. Kamerow Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the US Preventive Services Task Force Annu Rev Public Health 17 1996 511 538
22. A.D. Oxman, H.J. Schunemann, and A. Fretheim Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2 priority setting Health Res Policy Syst [serial online] 414 2006 http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/4/1/ 14 Accessed April 21, 2010
23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Evidence report series by number http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epc/epcseries.htm Accessed October 29, 2009
24. M. Clarke, S. Hopewell, and I. Chalmers Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report J R Soc Med 100 2007 187 190
25. D. Braithwaite, J. Emery, S. De Lusignan, and S. Sutton Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract 20 2003 545 551