Clinical utility of multiparameter flow cytometry in the diagnosis of 1013 patients with suspected myelodysplastic syndrome: Correlation to cytomorphology, cytogenetics, and clinical data

Cancer

Volumn 116, Issue 19, 2010, Pages 4549-4563

  Kern, Wolfgang ^a   Haferlach, Claudia ^a   Schnittger, Susanne ^a   Haferlach, Torsten ^a  

^a MLL MUNICH LEUKEMIA LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cytogenetics; Cytomorphology; Flow cytometry; Myelodysplasia

Indexed keywords

CD11B ANTIGEN; CD15 ANTIGEN; CD16 ANTIGEN; CD33 ANTIGEN; CD5 ANTIGEN; CD56 ANTIGEN; CD64 ANTIGEN; CD7 ANTIGEN; CD71 ANTIGEN; HLA DR ANTIGEN; MICROSOMAL AMINOPEPTIDASE; LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; BLAST CELL; BONE MARROW CELL; CANCER SURVIVAL; CELL STRUCTURE; CHILD; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CYTOGENETICS; CYTOPENIA; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ERYTHROCYTE; ERYTHROID CELL; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GRANULOCYTE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL PROGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOCYTE; MULTIPARAMETER FLOW CYTOMETRY; MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; MORTALITY; MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ANTIGENS, CD; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ERYTHROCYTES; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GRANULOCYTES; HUMANS; MONOCYTES; MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES; MYELOID CELLS;

EID: 77957567050     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25353     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Cazzola M, Malcovati L. Myelodysplastic syndromes - coping with ineffective hematopoiesis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352: 536-538.
2. Sole F, Luno E, Sanzo C, et al. Identification of novel cytogenetic markers with prognostic significance in a series of 968 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. 2005;90:1168-1178.
3. Haase D. Cytogenetic features in myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol. 2008;87:515-526.
4. Fenaux P. Chromosome and molecular abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndromes. Int J Hematol. 2001;73:429-437.
5. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1982;51:189-199.
6. Goasguen JE, Matsuo T, Cox C, Bennett JM. Evaluation of the dysmyelopoiesis in 336 patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: major importance of dysgranulopoiesis for remission and survival. Leukemia. 1992;6:520-525.
7. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2001.
8. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2008.
9. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009; 114:937-951.
10. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau M, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997;89:2079-2088.
11. Malcovati L, Germing U, Kuendgen A, et al. Time-dependent prognostic scoring system for predicting survival and leukemic evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3503-3510.
12. Howe RB, Porwit-MacDonald A, Wanat R, Tehranchi R, Hellstrom-Lindberg E. The WHO classification of MDS does make a difference. Blood. 2004;103:3265-3270.
13. Ogata K, Nakamura K, Yokose N, et al. Clinical significance of phenotypic features of blasts in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2002;100:3887-3896.
14. Stetler-Stevenson M, Arthur DC, Jabbour N, et al. Diagnostic utility of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2001;98:979-987.
15. Wells DA, Benesch M, Loken MR, et al. Myeloid and monocytic dyspoiesis as determined by flow cytometric scoring in myelodysplastic syndrome correlates with the IPSS and with outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2003;102:394-403.
16. van de Loosdrecht AA, Westers TM, Westra AH, Drager AM, van der Velden VH, Ossenkoppele GJ. Identification of distinct prognostic subgroups in low- and intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes by flow cytometry. Blood. 2008;111:1067-1077.
17. Haferlach T, Schoch C, Loffler H, et al. Morphologic dysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is related to unfavorable cytogenetics but has no independent prognostic relevance under the conditions of intensive induction therapy: results of a multiparameter analysis from the German AML Cooperative Group studies. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21:256-265.
18. Haferlach T, Winkemann M, Loffler H, et al. The abnormal eosinophils are part of the leukemic cell population in acute myelomonocytic leukemia with abnormal eosinophils (AML M4Eo) and carry the pericentric inversion 16: a combination of May-Grunwald-Giemsa staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Blood. 1996;87:2459-2463.
19. Haferlach T, Kohlmann A, Schnittger S, et al. AML M3 and AML M3 variant each have a distinct gene expression signature but also share patterns different from other genetically defined AML subtypes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;43:113-127.
20. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposal for the recognition of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML-MO) [see comments]. Br J Haematol. 1991; 78:325-329.
21. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:620-625.
22. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) Cooperative Group. Br J Haematol. 1976;33: 451-458.
23. Schoch C, Haferlach T, Bursch S, et al. Loss of genetic material is more common than gain in acute myeloid leukemia with complex aberrant karyotype: a detailed analysis of 125 cases using conventional chromosome analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization including 24-color FISH. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002;35:20-29.
24. Schoch C, Kern W, Krawitz P, et al. Dependence of age-specific incidence of acute myeloid leukemia on karyotype. Blood. 2001;98:3500.
25. Schoch C, Haferlach T, Haase D, et al. Patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia and complex karyotype aberrations show a poor prognosis despite intensive treatment: a study of 90 patients. Br J Haematol. 2001;112:118-126.
26. Schoch C, Kern W, Kohlmann A, Hiddemann W, Schnittger S, Haferlach T. Acute myeloid leukemia with a complex aberrant karyotype is a distinct biological entity characterized by genomic imbalances and a specific gene expression profile. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;43:227-238.
27. Haferlach C, Rieder H, Lillington DM, et al. Proposals for standardized protocols for cytogenetic analyses of acute leukemias, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic myeloproliferative disorders, and myelodysplastic syndromes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007;46:494-499.
28. Orfao A, Ortuno F, de Santiago M, Lopez A, San Miguel J. Immunophenotyping of acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Cytometry. 2004;58A:62-71.
29. Karmon Y, Manaster J, Chezar J. Immunophenotypic characterization of myelopoiesis in early and late myelodysplastic syndromes: use of CD44 as an aid in early diagnosis. Cytometry. 2002;50:225-230.
30. Borowitz MJ, Guenther KL, Shults KE, Stelzer GT. Immunophenotyping of acute leukemia by flow cytometric analysis. Use of CD45 and right-angle light scatter to gate on leukemic blasts in 3-color analysis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993;100:534-540.
31. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-481.
32. Valent P, Horny HP, Bennett JM, et al. Definitions and standards in the diagnosis and treatment of the myelodysplastic syndromes: consensus statements and report from a working conference. Leuk Res. 2007;31:727-736.
33. Valent P, Hofmann WK, Busche G, et al. Meeting report: Vienna 2008 Workshop of the German-Austrian Working Group for Studying Prognostic Factors in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Ann Hematol. 2009;88:607-611.
34. van de Loosdrecht AA, Alhan C, Bene MC, et al. Standardization of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes: report from the first European LeukemiaNet working conference on flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. 2009;94:1124-1134.
35. Loken MR, van de LA, Ogata K, Orfao A, Wells DA. Flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes: report from a working conference. Leuk Res. 2008;32:5-17.
36. Truong F, Smith BR, Stachurski D, et al. The utility of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in cytopenic patients with a non-diagnostic bone marrow: a prospective study. Leuk Res. 2009;33:1039-1046.
37. Xu Y, McKenna RW, Karandikar NJ, Pildain AJ, Kroft SH. Flow cytometric analysis of monocytes as a tool for distinguishing chronic myelomonocytic leukemia from reactive monocytosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124:799-806.
38. Kussick SJ, Fromm JR, Rossini A, et al. Four-color flow cytometry shows strong concordance with bone marrow morphology and cytogenetics in the evaluation for myelodysplasia. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124:170-181.