Is a randomized trial necessary to determine whether endovascular repair is the preferred management strategy in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms?

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1087-1093

  Veith, Frank J ^a,d   Powell, Janet T ^b   Hinchliffe, Robert J ^c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c St Georges Vascular Institute   (United Kingdom)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ABDOMINAL COMPARTMENT SYNDROME; ANESTHESIA; ANEURYSM SURGERY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MORTALITY; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77957562045     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.142     Document Type: Article

References (0)