Comparison of bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine in an equal dose and concentration for sympathetic block in dogs

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 409-411

  Hashimoto, Tomoki ^a   Iwasaki, Tadaomi ^a   Takahashi, Yoshiyuki ^a   Kimura, Yoshiyuki ^a   Nagao, Masaru ^a   Yamaguchi, Shigeki ^a   Hamaguchi, Shinsuke ^a   Kitajima, Toshimitsu ^a  

^a DOKKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; DIAZEPAM; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; PENTAZOCINE; ROPIVACAINE; VECURONIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTERIAL CARBON DIOXIDE TENSION; ARTERIAL OXYGEN TENSION; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTICLE; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; BRACHIAL ARTERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG POTENCY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYMPATHETIC BLOCKING; VASODILATATION;

AMIDES; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; ANIMALS; AUTONOMIC NERVE BLOCK; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRACHIAL ARTERY; BUPIVACAINE; DOGS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; MALE; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW;

EID: 77957558730     PISSN: 10987339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181e6acf1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Casati A, Moizo E, Marchetti C., Vinciguerra F. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of unilateral spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or levobupivacaine for inguinal herniorrhaphy. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99: 1387-1392.
2. Ingelmo PM, Locatelli BG, Sonzogni V, et al. Caudal 0.2% ropivacaine is less effective during surgery than 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.2% bupivacaine: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006; 16: 955-961.
3. Breschan C, Jost R, Krumpholz R., et al. A prospective study comparing the analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing caudal blockade. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005; 15: 301-306.
4. Camorcia M, Capogna G, Columb MO Minimum local analgesic doses of ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for intrathecal labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2005; 102: 646-650.
5. Lacassie HJ, Habib AS, Lacassie H.P., Columb MO Motor blocking minimum local anesthetic concentrations of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in labor. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007; 32: 323-329.
6. Beilin Y, Guinn NR, Bernstein H.H., Zahn J., Hossain S, Bodian CA Local anesthetics and mode of delivery: bupivacaine versus ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105: 756-763.
7. Lim Y, Ocampo CE, Sia AT A comparison of duration of analgesia of intrathecal 2.5 mg of bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine in combined spinal epidural analgesia for patients in labor. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98: 235-239.
8. Ivani G, DeNegri P, Conio A., et al. Comparison of racemic bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and levo-bupivacaine for pediatric caudal anesthesia: effects on postoperative analgesia and motor block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002; 27: 157-161.
9. Graf BM, Abraham I, Eberbach N., Kunst G, Stowe DF, Martin E. Differences in cardiotoxicity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine are the result of physicochemical and stereoselective properties. Anesthesiology. 2002; 96: 1427-1434.
10. Guinet P, Estebe J-P, Ratajczak-Enselme M, et al. Electrocardiographic and hemodynamic effects of intravenous infusion of bupivacaine, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and lidocaine in anesthetized ewes. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009; 34: 17-23.
11. Groban L. Central nervous system and cardiac effects from long-acting amide local anesthetic toxicity in the intact animal model. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003; 28: 3-11.
12. Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesth. 2005; 19: 247-268.
13. González-Suárez S, Pacheco M, Roigé J, Puig MM. Comparative study of ropivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaine 0.33% in axillary brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009; 34: 414-419.
14. Fujiki A, Masuda A, Inoue H. Effects of unilateral stellate ganglion block on the spectral characteristics of heart rate variability. Jpn Circ J. 1999; 63: 854-858.
15. Cinca J, Evangelista A, Montoya J., et al. Electrophysiologic effects of unilateral right and left stellate ganglion block on the human heart. Am Heart J. 1895; 109: 46-54.
16. Kashima T, Tanaka H, Minagoe S., Toda H. Electrocardiographic changes induced by the stellate ganglion block in normal subjects. J Electrocardiol. 1981; 14: 169-174.
17. Schlack W, Schäfer S, Thämer V. Left stellate ganglion block impairs left ventricular function. Anesth Analg. 1994; 79: 1082-1088.
18. Kitajima T, Okuda Y, Mishio M., Hamaguchi S, Yamaguchi S, Kimura Y. Acute cigarette smoking reduces vasodilative effect induced by sympathetic block in dogs. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001; 26: 41-45.
19. Takahashi Y, Yamaguchi S, Tezuka M., et al. Comparison of 0.2% ropivacaine, 0.125% bupivacaine, and 0.25% bupivacaine for duration and magnitude of action in peripheral arterial blood flow induced by sympathetic block in dogs. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004; 29: 441-445.
20. Iwasaki T, Takahashi Y, Kimura Y., Yamazaki H, Yamaguchi S, Kitajima T. Comparison of 0.25% levobupivacaine, 0.25% bupivacaine, and 0.125% bupivacaine for duration and magnitude of action in peripheral arterial blood flow induced by sympathetic block in dogs. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007; 32: 87-101.