Magnetic multipolar contact fields: The anapole and related moments

American Journal of Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 936-948

  Gray, C G ^a   Karl, G ^a   Novikov, V A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957378095     PISSN: 00029505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1119/1.3427412     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Jackson JD. Classical Electrodynamics 1999, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York).
2. Raab RE, de Lange OL. Multipole Theory in Electromagnetism 2005, (Oxford U. P., Oxford).
3. Gray CG, Gubbins KE. Theory of Molecular Fluids 1984, (Oxford U. P., Oxford).
4. Gray CG, Karl G, Novikov VA. Quadrupolar contact fields: Theory and applications. Am. J. Phys. 2009, 77:807-817. AJPIAS, 0002-9505, 10.1119/1.3138700.
5. Fermi E. Über die magnetischen momente der atomkerne. Z. Phys. 1930, 60:320-333. ZEPYAA, 0044-3328, 10.1007/BF01339933.
6. 188. Reference c1.
7. Griffiths DJ. Hyperfine splitting of the ground state of hydrogen. Am. J. Phys. 1982, 50:698-703. AJPIAS, 0002-9505, 10.1119/1.12733.
8. For some historical references, see Ref. c4, endnote 10.
9. Pauling L, Goudsmit S. Structure of Line Spectra 1930, 208. and, (McGraw-Hill, New York, ).
10. Casimir HB G, Karreman C. Magnetic octupole moment of a nucleus. Physica (Amsterdam) 1942, 9:494-502. PHYSAG, 0031-8914, 10.1016/S0031-8914(42)90085-5.
11. Zeldovich IB. Electromagnetic interaction with parity violation. Sov. Phys. JETP 1957, 6:1184-1186. SPHJAR, 0038-5646.
12. Khriplovich IB. Parity Nonconservation in Atomic Phenomena 1991, (Gordon and Breach, Philadelphia).
13. Haxton WC, Wieman CE. Atomic parity nonconservation and nuclear anapole moments. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2001, 51:261-293. ARPSDF, 0163-8998, 10.1146/annurev.nucl.51.101701.132458.
14. Lewis RR. Anapole moments of atoms and molecules. Comments At. Mol. Phys. 1995, 31:67-86. CAMPBS, 0010-2687.
15. Wood CS, Bennett SC, Cho D, Masterson BP, Roberts JL, Tanner CE, Wieman CE. Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in Cesium. Science 1997, 275:1759-1763. SCIEAS, 0036-8075, 10.1126/science.275.5307.1759, ,.
16. Tsigutkin K, Dounas-Frazer D, Family A, Stalnaker JE, Yashchuk VV, Budker D. Observation of large atomic parity violation effect in ytterbium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103:071601. PRLTAO, 0031-9007, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.071601.
17. 2.
18. Porsev SG. Quadrupole toroidal moment of positronium. Phys. Rev. A 1994, 49:5105-5107. PLRAAN, 1050-2947, 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.5105.
19. Historical references to the work of Debye, Elsasser, and others are given in Refs. c20 c21.
20. Gray CG, Nickel BG. Debye potential representation of vector fields. Am. J. Phys. 1978, 46:735-736. AJPIAS, 0002-9505, 10.1119/1.11111.
21. Gray CG. Multipole expansions of electromagnetic fields using Debye potentials. Am. J. Phys. 1978, 46:169-179. AJPIAS, 0002-9505, 10.1119/1.11364.
22. Gray CG, Stiles PJ. Spherical tensor approach to multipole expansions. II Magnetostatic interactions. Can. J. Phys. 1976, 54:513-518. CJPHAD, 0008-4204.
23. Gray CG. Magnetic multipole expansions using the scalar potential. Am. J. Phys. 1979, 47:457-459. AJPIAS, 0002-9505, 10.1119/1.11816.
24. Gray CG, Bronzan JB. The magnetic scalar potential. Am. J. Phys. 1971, 39:1357-1359. AJPIAS, 0002-9505, 10.1119/1.11285, AJPIAS, 0002-9505, 10.1119/1.1976655.
25. Gray CG. Definition of the magnetic quadrupole moment. Am. J. Phys. 1980, 48:984-985. AJPIAS, 0002-9505, 10.1119/1.12213.
26. Jr)=0 and then contract and To show that dr(LJ)=0, first write it as idr(rJ)=idr(rJ), then apply Gauss theorem with a distant surface, and use the fact that J(r) is localized near the origin of coordinates.
27. This expression for a can be shown to be equivalent to the one given in Sec. (see Ref. c30).
28. 2(rJ+Jr)] given in Ref. c18 can be shown to be equivalent to Eq. using the methods in Refs. c29 c30.
29. Jrrr]=0. The latter relation follows from dr(Jrrrr)=0 (use Gauss theorem with a distant surface and the fact that J(r) is localized near the origin) when we expand out (Jrrrr) and use J=0.
30. 2=2dr(rJ)r. A third possible definition of the anapole moment is a=(1/3c)drr(rJ). Note that our definition of a is a factor of (1/2c) times the definition in Ref. c12.
31. 2b/c)=a fixed.
32. 2. The point octopole limit is obtained for R0, d0, and I, with fixed.
33. Tzz/2 because T is traceless. The continuum limit is obtained for N and I0, with NI fixed.
34. 2r. This primitive electric moment is one of two terms constituting the Schiff moment (Refs. c12 c41), which arises in the discussion of Schiffs theorem (see Refs. c12 c41 c46). The latter theorem deals with the screening or antiscreening of electron and/or nuclear electric dipole moments in generating the net electric dipole moment of an isolated atom or molecule. Nonvanishing electron and nuclear electric dipole moments are possible if parity and time-reversal symmetries are violated (see Sec. ).
35. A derivation using spherical tensors is given in Ref. c22. A derivation using Cartesian tensors follows the same argument used to derive the corresponding relation for the electric quadrupole moment given in Ref. c3.
36. Cook DM. The Theory of the Electromagnetic Field 1975, 135-136. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
37. Use dr(Jr)=0 from Gauss theorem with a distant surface and the fact that J(r) is localized near the origin and J=0.
38. Regan BC, Commins ED, Schmidt CJ, Demille D. New limit on the electron dipole moment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88:071805. PRLTAO, 0031-9007, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.071805, -14 .
39. Baker CA, Improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97:131801. PRLTAO, 0031-9007, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.131801, -14 .
40. Romalis MV, Griffith WC, Jacobs JP, Fortson EN. New limit on the permanent electric dipole moment of H199g Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86:2505-2508. PRLTAO, 0031-9007, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2505.
41. Khriplovich IB, Lamoreaux SK. CP Violation without Strangeness: Electric Dipole Moments of Particles, Atoms, and Molecules 1997, and, (Springer, Berlin).
42. Bernreuther W, Suzuki M. The electric dipole moment of the electron. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1991, 63:313-340. RMPHAT, 0034-6861, 10.1103/RevModPhys.63.313.
43. Bouchiat M-A, Bouchiat C. Parity violation in atoms. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1997, 60:1351-1396. RPPHAG, 0034-4885, 10.1088/0034-4885/60/11/004.
44. Wieman CE. Flavour Physics for the Millennium 2000, 373-375. J. L. Rosner, in, edited by (World Scientific, Singapore).
45. Commins ED. Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 1999, 40:1-55. B. Bederson, H. Walther, in, Vol., edited by and (Academic, San Diego).
46. Commins ED, Jackson JD, Demille DP. The electric dipole moment of the electron: An intuitive explanation for the evasion of Schiff's theorem. Am. J. Phys. 2007, 75:532-536. AJPIAS, 0002-9505, 10.1119/1.2710486.
47. Landau L, Landau L. Conservation laws in weak interactions. Nucl. Phys. 1957, 3:127-131. JTPHES, 1063-7761, NUPBBO, 0550-3213, 10.1016/0029-5582(57)90061-5, , On the conservation laws for weak interactions,.
48. Runcorn SK. An ancient lunar magnetic dipole field. Nature (London) 1975, 253:701-703. NATUAS, 0028-0836, 10.1038/253701a0.
49. Runcorn SK. On the interpretation of lunar magnetism. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1975, 10:327-335. PEPIAM, 0031-9201, 10.1016/0031-9201(75)90059-X.
50. Jackson A. Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism 2007, 888-889. D. Gubbins, E. Herrero-Bervera, 10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_285, in, edited by and (Springer, Dordrecht).
51. 192. Reference c1.
52. Bransden BH, Joachain CJ. Physics of Atoms and Molecules 1983, and, (Longman, Harlow).
53. Karl G, Novikov VA, Karl G, Novikov VA, Karl G, Novikov V, Krivoruchenko MI, Faessler A. Decays, contact p-wave interactions and hyperfine structure in omega exotic atoms. Nucl. Phys. A 2008, 803:173-209. PRVCAN, 0556-2813, 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.024001, PRVCAN, 0556-2813, 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.039901, FIZBE7, 1330-0016, NUPABL, 0375-9474, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.002, -17 and, Erratum: Quadrupolar contact terms and hyperfine structure [Phys. Rev. C 74, 024001 (2006)].
54. 212 was not given in the listing of the contact terms in Ref. c4.
55. Gerginov V, Tanner CE, Johnson WR, Beloy K, Derevianko A, Johnson WR, Beloy K, Derevianko A, Dzuba VA, Howell GT, Blinov BB, Fortson EN, Gerginov V, Derivianko A, Tanner CE, Becker O, Enders K, Werth G, Dembczynski J. Hyperfine-structure measurements of the E151,153u+ ground state. Phys. Rev. A 1993, 48:3546-3554. CJPHAD, 0008-4204, 10.1139/P08-145, PLRAAN, 1050-2947, 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.012512, PLRAAN, 1050-2947, 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.052503, PRLTAO, 0031-9007, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.072501, PLRAAN, 1050-2947, 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.3546, -110, -17, -14.
56. Schwartz C. Theory of hyperfine structure. Phys. Rev. 1955, 97:380-395. PRVAAH, 0096-8250, 10.1103/PhysRev.97.380.
57. Malli G, Fraga S. Octopole hyperfine interaction constants. Can. J. Phys. 1965, 45:219-220. CJPHAD, 0008-4204.
58. Armstrong JL. Theory of the Hyperfine Structure of Free Atoms 1971, (Wiley, New York).