Water under the BAR

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1783-1790

  Lyman, Edward ^a,b   Cui, Haosheng ^a,b   Voth, Gregory A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957371847     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.074     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. McMahon, H. T., and J. L. Gallop. 2005. Membrane curvature and mechanisms of dynamic cell membrane remodeling. Nature. 438:590-596.
2. Zimmerberg, J., and M. M. Kozlov. 2006. How proteins produce cellular membrane curvature. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7:9-19.
3. Slepnev, V. I., and P. De Camilli. 2000. Accessory factors in clathrin-dependent synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1: 161-172.
4. Zimmerberg, J., and S. McLaughlin. 2004. Membrane curvature: how BAR domains bend bilayers. Curr. Biol. 14:R250-R252.
5. Peter, B. J., H. M. Kent, H. T. McMahon. 2004. BAR domains as sensors of membrane curvature: the amphiphysin BAR structure. Science. 303:495-499.
6. Farsad, K., N. Ringstad, P. De Camilli. 2001. Generation of high curvature membranes mediated by direct endophilin bilayer interactions. J. Cell Biol. 155:193-200.
7. Martens, S., M. M. Kozlov, and H. T. McMahon. 2007. How synaptotagmin promotes membrane fusion. Science. 316:1205-1208.
8. Ford, M. G. J., I. G. Mills, H. T. McMahon. 2002. Curvature of clathrin-coated pits driven by epsin. Nature. 419:361-366.
9. Fernandes, F., L. M. S. Loura, M. Prieto. 2008. Role of helix 0 of the N-BAR domain in membrane curvature generation. Biophys. J. 94:3065-3073.
10. Campelo, F., H. T. McMahon, and M. M. Kozlov. 2008. The hydrophobic insertion mechanism of membrane curvature generation by proteins. Biophys. J. 95:2325-2339.
11. Ayton, G. S., E. Lyman, and G. A. Voth. 2010. Hierarchical coarse- graining strategy for protein-membrane systems to access mesoscopic scales. Faraday Discuss. 144:347-357, discussion 445-481.
12. Ayton, G. S., E. Lyman, G. A. Voth. 2009. New insights into BAR domain-induced membrane remodeling. Biophys. J. 97:1616-1625.
13. Blood, P. D., R. D. Swenson, and G. A. Voth. 2008. Factors influencing local membrane curvature induction by N-BAR domains as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 95:1866-1876.
14. Ayton, G. S., P. D. Blood, and G. A. Voth. 2007. Membrane remodeling from N-BAR domain interactions: insights from multi-scale simulation. Biophys. J. 92:3595-3602.
15. Blood, P. D., and G. A. Voth. 2006. Direct observation of Bin/amphi-physin/Rvs (BAR) domain-induced membrane curvature by means of molecular dynamics simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:15068-15072.
16. Arkhipov, A., Y. Yin, and K. Schulten. 2008. Four-scale description of membrane sculpting by BAR domains. Biophys. J. 95:2806-2821.
17. Arkhipov, A., Y. Yin, and K. Schulten. 2009. Membrane-bending mechanism of amphiphysin N-BAR domains. Biophys. J. 97:2727-2735.
18. Gallop, J. L., and H. T. McMahon. 2005. BAR domains and membrane curvature: bringing your curves to the BAR. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 72:223-231.
19. Khelashvili, G., D. Harries, and H. Weinstein. 2009. Modeling membrane deformations and lipid demixing upon protein-membrane interaction: the BAR dimer adsorption. Biophys. J. 97:1626-1635.
20. Drin, G., J.-F. Casella, B. Antonny. 2007. A general amphipathic α-helical motif for sensing membrane curvature. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:138-146.
21. Bhatia, V. K., K. L. Madsen, D. Stamou. 2009. Amphipathic motifs in BAR domains are essential for membrane curvature sensing. EMBO J. 28:3303-3314.
22. Hatzakis, N. S., V. K. Bhatia, D. Stamou. 2009. How curved membranes recruit amphipathic helices and protein anchoring motifs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5:835-841.
23. Yin, Y., A. Arkhipov, and K. Schulten. 2009. Simulations of membrane tabulation by lattices of amphiphysin N-BAR domains. Structure. 17:882-892.
24. Frost, A., R. Perera, V. M. Unger. 2008. Structural basis of membrane invagination by F-BAR domains. Cell. 132:807-817.
25. Phillips, J. C., R. Braun, K. Schulten. 2005. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26:1781-1802.
26. MacKerell, A. D., D. Bashford, D. Karplus. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:3586-3616.
27. Feller, S. E., and A. D. MacKerell. 2000. An improved empirical potential energy function for molecular simulations of phospholipids. J. Phys. Chem. B. 104:7510-7515.
28. Ryckaert, J.-P., G. Ciccotti, and H. J. C. Berendsen. 1977. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of ν-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23:327-341.
29. Feller, S. E., Y. Zhang, B. R. Brooks. 1995. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys. 103:4613-4621.
30. Grest, G. S., and K. Kremer. 1986. Molecular dynamics simulation for polymers in the presence of a heat bath. Phys. Rev. A. 33:3628-3631.
31. Masuda, M., S. Takeda, N. Mochizuki. 2006. Endophilin BAR domain drives membrane curvature by two newly identified structure-based mechanisms. EMBO J. 25:2889-2897.
32. Hess, B., C. Holm, and N. van der Vegt. 2006. Osmotic coefficients of atomistic NaCl (aq) force fields. J. Chem. Phys. 124:164509.
33. Reith, D., M. Putz, and F. Muller-Plathe. 2003. Deriving effective mesoscale potentials from atomistic simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 24:1624-1636.
34. Marrink, S. J., H. J. Risselada, A. H. de Vries. 2007. The MARTINI force field: coarse-grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 111:7812-7824.
35. Humphrey, W., A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. 1996. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14:33-38, 27-28.
36. Reference deleted in proof.