|
Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 292-296
|
Perioperative outcomes in hybrid versus conventional surgical coronary artery revascularisation
|
Author keywords
Best evidence topic; Coronary artery bypass; Myocardial revascularization; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Postoperative complications
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT;
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE;
CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION;
HEART DISEASE;
HUMAN;
INTENSIVE CARE;
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MORBIDITY;
OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;
PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
STERNOTOMY;
SURGICAL MORTALITY;
VASCULAR PATENCY;
AGED;
ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY;
BENCHMARKING;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP;
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION;
PATIENT SELECTION;
RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 77957371556
PISSN: 15699293
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2010.239178 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (8)
|