Useful scientific theories are useful: A reply to Rouder, Pratte, and Morey (2010)

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 436-442

  Wixted, John T ^a   Mickes, Laura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957368483     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.436     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. DeCarlo, L. T. (2002). Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review, 109, 710-721.
2. Egan, J. P. (1958). Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (Tech. Note AFCRC-TN-58-51). Bloomington: Indiana University, Hearing and Communication Laboratory.
3. Egan, J. P. (1975). Signal detection theory and ROC-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
4. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
5. Lockhart, R. S., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1970). Memory and the theory of signal detection. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 100-109.
6. Mickes, L., Wixted, J. T., & Wais, P. E. (2007). A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 858-865.
7. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
8. Rouder, J. N., Pratte, M. S., & Morey, R. D. (2010). Latent mnemonic strengths are latent: A comment on Mickes, Wixted, and Wais (2007). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 427-435.
9. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.