Private practice outcomes: Validated outcomes data collection in private practice

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2640-2645

  Goldstein, Jack ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILLING AND CLAIMS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DATA MINING; DEMOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION PROCESS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SECURITY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DATA BASE; INTERNET; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMPUTER SECURITY; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DATA COLLECTION; DATA MINING; DATABASES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRIVATE PRACTICE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77957346552     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1397-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. I Alexander 2003 The impact of future trends in electronic data collection on musculoskeletal research and evidence-based orthopaedic care Arthroscopy. 19 1007 1011 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.024 14608322
2. M Bhandari S Morshed P Tornetta 3rd EH Schemitsch 2009 Design, conduct, and interpretation of nonrandomized orthopaedic studies: a practical approach. (All) evidence matters J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 (suppl 3) 1 2 10.2106/JBJS.H.01747 19411492
3. J Bernstein 2004 Evidence based medicine J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 12 80 88 15089081
4. DM Bryant K Willits BP Hanson 2009 Principles of designing a cohort study in orthopaedics J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 suppl 3 10 14 10.2106/JBJS.H.01597 19411494
5. EA Codman 2009 The Classic: The registry of bone sarcomas as an example of the end-result idea in hospital organization Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467 2766 2770 10.1007/s11999-009-1048-7 19690928
6. Cooper A. 1995 About Face: The Essentials of User Interface Design. Foster City CA: IDG Books Worldwide Inc.
7. B Espehaug O Furnes LB Engesaeter LI Havelin 2009 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: concerns about some newer implants Acta Orthop. 80 402 412 10.3109/ 17453670903161124 19857178
8. DL Hart YC Wang PW Stratford JE Mioduski 2008 Computerized adaptive test for patients with knee impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function J Clin Epidem. 61 1113 1124 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.005
9. Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P, eds. Forming Research Questions in Clinical Epidemiology: How To Do Clinical Practice Research. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006: 3-14.
10. DJ Hoppe EA Schemitsch S Morshed P Tornetta III M Bhandari 2009 Hierarchy of evidence: where observational studies fit in and why we need them J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91 2 9 10.2106/JBJS.H.01571 19411493
11. SR Hurwitz 2000 Orthopaedic information mastery: applying evidence-based information tools to improve patient outcomes while saving orthopedists' time J Bone Joint Surg Am. 82 888 893 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czhsFKnsA%3D%3D 10859110
12. SJ Lee A Kavanaugh L Lenert 2007 Electronic and computer-generated patient questionnaires in standard care Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 21 637 647 10.1016/j.berh.2007.02.001 17678825
13. WT Obremskey N Pappas E Attallah-Wasif P Tornetta III M Bhandari 2005 Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87 2632 2638 10.2106/JBJS.E.00370 16322612
14. Patrick JJ. SQL Fundamentals. 2nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR; 2002.
15. RN Rosier 2006 Institutional barriers to the orthopaedic clinical scientist Clin Orthop Relat Res. 449 159 164 10.1097/01.blo.0000229286.83603.ce 16888531
16. MF Swiontkowski 2003 Why we should collect outcomes data J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 Suppl 1 S14 S15 12540664
17. MF Swiontkowski JA Buckwalter RB Keller R Haralson 1999 The outcomes movement in orthopaedic surgery: where we are and where we should go J Bone Joint Surg Am. 81 732 740 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3oslCnug%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.81B6. 9794 10360703
18. YC Wang DL Hart PW Stratford JE Mioduski 2009 Clinical interpretation of computerized adaptive test-generated outcome measures in patients with knee impairments Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 90 1340 1348 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.008 19651268
19. M Zlowodzki M Bhandari 2009 Outcomes measures and implications for sample-size calculations J Bone Joint Surg Am. 91 (Supp3) 35 40 10.2106/JBJS.H.01602 19411498