Wildlife or livestock? Divergent paths for the vicuña as priorities change in the pursuit of sustainable development

South American Camelids Research: Proceedings of the 4th European Symposium on South American Camelids and DECAMA European Seminar

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 27-36

  Laker, Jerry ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957343599     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-576-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Anon., 1993. Informe del censo de vicuñas año 1993, Reserva Laguna Blanca. Catamarca, Argentina, Direccion de Ganaderia y Fauna de Catamarca.
2. Bernhardson, W., 1986. Campesinos and Conservation in the Central Andes-Indigenous Herding and Conservation of the Vicuña. Environ. Conserv. 13: 311-318.
3. Bonacic, C., D.W. Macdonald, J. Galaz and R.M. Sibly, 2002. Density dependence in the camelid Vicugna vicugna: the recovery of a protected population in Chile. Oryx 36: 11 8-125.
4. Brack, A., 1980. Situacion actual de la poblacion de vicuñas en Pampa Galeras y zonas aledanas y recomendaciones para su manejo. Proyecto Especial de Utilizacion Racional de la Vicuña, Ministerio de Agricultura y Alimentacion, Peru, 15 pp.
5. Brack, E., D. Hoces and J. Sotelo, 1981. Situacion actual de la vicuña en el Peru y acciones a ejecutarse para su manejo durante el ano 1981. In: PEURV, pp. 71.
6. Canedi, A.A. and R.P. Virgili, 2000. Censo de vicuñas-informe final. Buenos Aires, Argentina, Consejo Federal de Inversiones-Provincia de Catamarca.
7. Cattan, P.E. and A.A. Glade, 1989. Management of the Vicuña Vicugna vicugna in Chile-Use of a matrix model to assess harvest rates. Biol. Conserv. 49: 131-140.
8. CONACS, 1997. Censo Nacional de Vicuñas, 1997, Ministerio de Agricultura, Peru. 132 pp.
9. Cueto, L., C. Ponce, E. Cardiach and M. Rios, 1985. Management of vicuña: its contribution to rural development in the high Andes of Peru. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome. 38 pp.
10. D.G.B., 1997. Censo Nacional de la Vicuña en Bolivia. La Paz, Bolivia, Dirección Nacional de Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Unidad de Vida Silvestre, 60 pp.
11. Eltringham, S. and W. Jordan, 1981. The vicuña in Pampa Galeras National Reserve-the conservation issue. In: Problems in management of locally available wild animals. Academic Press, London.
12. Fernandez, C. and R. Luxmoore, 1995. Commercial ultilization of vicuña in Chile and Peru. In: World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge.
13. Flores-Ochoa, J., 1977. Pastores de alpacas de los Andes. In: Pastores de Puna Uywamichiq punarunakuna, Flores-Ochoa, J. (ed.). Instituto de Estudios Andinos, Lima.
14. Flores-Ochoa, J., 1994. The Andean camelids. Gold of the Andes: the llamas, alpacas, vicuñas and guanacos of South America. J. Martinez, Francis. O. Patthey and sons, Barcelona.
15. Galaz, J., 1998. El manejo de la vicuña en Chile. In: La conservacion de la fauna nativa chilena: logros y perspectivas. Valverde, V. (ed.), Corporacion Nacional Forestal, Santiago, Chile, pp 178.
16. Homes, V., 1999. On the scent: conserving musk deer-the uses of musk and Europe's role in its trade. In: TRAFFIC Europe.
17. IUCN, 1996. The red list of threatened animals. In. International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
18. IUCN, 2001. Analytic framework for assessing factors that influence sustainability of uses of wild living natural resources. IUCN Sustainable Use Specialist Group.
19. Lichtenstein, G., F. Oribe, M. Greig-Gran and S. Mazzuchelli, 2002. Manejo comunitario de vicuñas en Peru: Estudio de caso del manejo comunitario de vida silvestre. In: PIE Series No.2-Evaluating Eden. IIED, London.
20. Lichtenstein, G. and N. Renaudeau d'Arc, 2003. Vicuña use by Andean communities: a risk or an opportunity? In: The Commons in an Age of Global Transition: Challenges, Risks and Opportunities. Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP), Oaxaca, Mexico, August 9-13, 2004. http://www.iascp2004.org.mx/index_eng.html
21. Miller, S., 1980. Human influences on the distribution and abundance of wild Chilean mammals: prehistoric-present. University of Washington, Seattle.
22. Muñoz, E., 2004. Aplicación de manejo en cautiverio en la vicuña en la provincia de Parinacota. Wild Camelid Management. Vol II. www.macs.puc.cl.
23. Muspratt, J., D. Vaysse, et al., 1996. Informe definitivo del censo de vicuñas, 1996, en la reserva Laguna Diamante y Sierra Calalaste. Argentina, Gobierno de Catamarca, Servicio de Ganaderia y Fauna.
24. Novoa, C. and J. Wheeler, 1984. Lama and alpaca. In: Evolution of domesticated animals, Mason, I. (ed.), Longman, London, pp. 116-128.
25. Ochoa, J., 1994a. The Andean Camelids. In: Gold of the Andes: the llamas, alpacas, vicuñas and guanacos of South America, Martinez, J. (ed.), Francis. O. Patthey and sons, Barcelona, pp. 22-35.
26. Ochoa, J., 1994b. Man's relationship with the camelids. In: Gold of the Andes: the llamas, alpacas, vicuñas and guanacos of South America, Martinez, J. (ed.), Francis. O. Patthey and sons, Barcelona, pp. 22-35.
27. Orlove, B.S., 1977. Alpacas, sheep and men: the wool export economy and regional society in Southern Peru. New York, Academic Press. Studies in anthropology series XX, 270 pp.
28. Otte, K. and R. Hoffmann, 1981. The debate about the vicuña population in Pampa Galeras reserve. In: Problems in management of locally available wild animals, Hart, D. (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 259-275.
29. Rendon-Burgos, O., 2000. Experiencia Boliviana en el manejo communal de la vicuña. In: Manejo sustentable de la vicuña y guanaco, Iriarte, I. (ed.). SAG-PUC-FIA, Santiago, Chile.
30. Rodriguez, R. and Nunez E., 1987. El censo de la poblacion de vicuñas. In: Tecnicas para el manejo de la vicuña, IUCN (ed.), pp. 33-57.
31. Roe, D., T. Mulliken, S. Milledge, J. Mremi, S. Mosha and M. Greig-Gran, 2002. Making a living or making a killing? Wildlife trade, trade controls and rural livelihoods. In. TRAFFIC/IIED.
32. Shrestha, M.N., 1998. Animal welfare in the musk deer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 59: 245-250.
33. SSN, 2002. Vicuña conservation in Argentina. In. Species Survival Network. Information for COP-12 CITES.
34. Sumar, J., 1988. Present and potential role of South American camelids in the high Andes. Outlook on Agriculture 17: 23-29.
35. Torres, H., 1992. Camelidos Silvestres Sudamericanos. Un plan de Accion para su Conservacion. IUCN/CSE South American Camelid Specialist Group, 58 pp.
36. Traffic, 1999. Fashion statement spells death for Tibetan antelope. IUCN.
37. Urrutia, J.L., 2004. Proyecto Vicuña FIA-CONAF. Wild Camelid Management. Vol II. www.macs.puc.cl.
38. Vila, B.L., 2002. La silvestría de las vicuñas, una característica esencial para su conservación y manejo. Ecología Austral 12: 79-82.
39. Wheeler, J.C., 1995. Evolution and Present Situation of the South-American Camelidae. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 54: 271-295.
40. Wheeler, J.C. and D. Hoces, 1997. Community participation, sustainable use, and vicuña conservation in Peru. Mountain Research and Development 17: 283-287.
41. Yaccobaccio, H.D., L. Killian and B.L. Vilá, 2003. Explotacion de la vicuña durante el período colonial (1535-1810).Proceedings of the. III Taller Internacional de Zooarqueología de Camélidos Sudamericanos, (GZC-ICAZ): Manejo de los Camélidos Sudamericanos.