From voice to choice: Lessons from a regional capacity development initiative to strengthen social and gender analysis in participatory natural resource management research

International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 143-153

  Fajber, Liz ^a   Vernooy, Ronnie ^b  

^a INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

^b INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Asia; Capacity development; Gender analysis; Participatory learning; Social analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957318828     PISSN: 14735903     EISSN: 1747762X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2006.9684797     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Agarwal, B., 2001. Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender:An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29 (10):1623–1648.
2. Ahmed, S., 2001. Empowering rural women? Policies, institutions, and gendered outcomes in natural resource management. Development in Practice, 11 (4):535–537.
3. Chakravorty, B., 2004. Documentation of sharing of good practices in social/gender analysis. Unpublished report. New Delhi:International Development Research Centre.
4. Cornwall, A., 2000. Making a Difference? Gender and Participatory Development. IDS discussion paper 378. Sussex:Institute of Development Studies.
5. Cornwall, A., 2003. Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. World Development, 31 (8):1325–1342.
6. Cornwell, L., 2004. Mainstreaming gender:Imperatives for development studies. Africanus, 34 (1):51–63.
7. Thi Binh, Do, and Dagenais, H., 2000. Natural resource management and social/gender analysis and capacity building for social/gender analysis. Ottawa:IDRC. Unpublished document.
8. Enhancing Capacity to Engender Research (Vietnam). 2001. Participants' evaluation. Quebec:Laval University. Unpublished report
9. Fajber, L., and O'Manique, E., 2005. Strengthening gender in the ENRM program area:A discussion paper. Ottawa:IDRC. Unpublished document.
10. Farnworth, C. R., and Jiggins, J., 2003. Participatory Plant Breeding and Gender Analysis., PPB monograph no. 4 Cali:Participatory Research/Gender Analysis Program.
11. Howard, P., ed. 2003. Women and Plants:Gender Relations in Biodiversity Management and Conservation. London:Zed Books.
12. InterAction's Commission on the Advancement of Women and International Institute of Rural Reconstruction. 2004. Gender Mainstreaming in Action:Successful Innovations from Asia and the Pacific. Washington:InterAction's Commission on the Advancement of Women and Silang, Cavite:International Institute of Rural Reconstruction.
13. Kabeer, N., 1997. Reversed Realities:Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London/New York:Verso.
14. Kabeer, N., 2003. Gender Mainstreaming in Poverty Eradication and the Millenium Development Goals:A Handbook for Policy-Makers and other Stakeholders. London:Commonwealth Secretariat; Ottawa:International Development Research Centre; Hull:Canadian International Development Agency.
15. Kanji, N., 2003. Mind the Gap:Mainstreaming Participation in Gender and Development. London:International Institute for Environment and Development; Sussex:Institute for Development Studies.
16. Nakro, V., and Kikhi, C., 2006. “ Strengthening market linkages for women vegetable vendors:Experiences from Kohima, Nagaland, India ”. In Integrating Social and Gender Analysis into Natural Resource Management Research:Experiences from South and South-East Asia. Edited by:Vernooy, R., New Delhi:Sage; Ottawa:International Development Research Centre; Beijing:China Agricultural Press.
17. Participatory Research and Gender Analysis (PRGA). 2006. Mainstreaming of participatory research and gender analysis. On WWW at http://www.prgaprogram.org/index.php?module=htmlpages&func=display&pid=15. Accessed 21. 02. 2006
18. Rao, A., and Kelleher, D., 2005. Is there life after gender mainstreaming?. Gender and Development, 13 (2):57–69.
19. Röling, N., 2002. “ Beyond the aggregation of individual preferences:Moving from multiple to distributed cognition in resource dilemmas ”. In Wheel-Barrows Full of Frogs:Social Learning in Rural Resource Management Edited by:Leeuwis, C., and Pyburn, R., 25–47. Assen:Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
20. Scholey, P., 2001. Gender unit programming in research and mainstreaming, 2001–2004. Ottawa:IDRC. Unpublished document.
21. Vernooy, R., ed. 2006. Integrating Social and Gender Analysis into Natural Resource Management Research:Experiences from South and South-East Asia. New Delhi:Sage; Ottawa:International Development Research Centre; Beijing:China Agricultural Press.
22. Vernooy, R., and Fajber, L., 2004. “ Making gender and social analysis work for natural resource management research:an umbrella program for building researcher capacity. In InterAction's Commission on the Advancement of Women and International Institute of Rural Reconstruction ”. In Gender Mainstreaming in Action:Successful Innovations from Asia and the Pacific 208–223. Washington:InterAction's Commission on the Advancement of Women and Silang, Cavite:International Institute of Rural Reconstruction.
23. Vernooy, R., and Fajber, L., 2006. “ Integrating social and gender analysis into natural resource management research ”. In Integrating Social and Gender Analysis into Natural Resource Management Research:Experiences from South and South-east Asia Edited by:Vernooy, R., 17–36. New Delhi:Sage; Ottawa:International Development Research Centre; Beijing:China Agricultural Press.
24. Vernooy, R., and Zhang, L., 2006. “ Social and gender analysis is essential, not optional:Enhanced capacities and remaining challenges ”. In Integrating Social and Gender Analysis into Natural Resource Management Research:Experiences from South and South-east Asia Edited by:Vernooy, R., 225–236. New Delhi:Sage; Ottawa:International Development Research Centre; Beijing:China Agricultural Press.
25. Woolfrey, J., 2001. IDRC learning study:Special expert advisory fund for mainstreaming gender in IDRC. Ottawa:IDRC. Unpublished document.