Motion-onset visual evoked potentials predict performance during a global direction discrimination task

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 3563-3572

  Martin, Tim ^a,b   Huxlin, Krystel R ^a,b   Kavcic, Voyko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffusion model; EEG; Motion; Reaction time; Visual evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957315680     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ahlfors S.P., Simpson G.V., Dale A.M., Belliveau J.W., Liu A.K., Korvenoja A., et al. Spatiotemporal activity of a cortical network for processing visual motion revealed by MEG and fMRI. Journal of Neurophysiology 1999, 82:2545-2555.
2. Albright T.D., Stoner G.R. Visual motion perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1995, 92:2433-2440.
3. Bach M., Hoffman M.B. Visual motion detection in man is governed by non-retinal mechanisms. Vision Research 1999, 40:2379-2385.
4. Bach M., Ullrich D. Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials (motion VEP). Vision Research 1994, 34:1541-1547.
5. Bach M., Ullrich D. Contract dependency of motion-onset and pattern-reversal VEPs: Interaction of stimulus type, recording site and response component. Vision Research 1997, 37:1845-1849.
6. Bahramali H., Gordon E., Li W.M. Fast and slow reaction time changes reflected in ERP brain function. International Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 93:75-86.
7. Banquet J.P., Contreras-Vidal J.L. An integrated neural network-event-related potentials model of temporal and probability context effects on event categorization. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 1992, 1:541-546.
8. Blackwell H.R. Contrast thresholds of the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1946, 36:624-646.
9. Born R.T., Tootell R.B.H. Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area. Nature 1992, 357:497-499.
10. Braddick O.J., O'Brien J.M.D., Wattam-Bell J., Atkinson J., Hartley T., Turner R. Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion. Perception 2001, 30:61-72.
11. Castelo-Branco M., Formisano E., Backes W., Zanella F., Neuenschwander S., Singer W., et al. Activity patterns in human motion-sensitive areas depend on the interpretation of global motion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2002, 99:13914-13919.
12. Castelo-Branco M., Mendes M., Sebastião, Reis A., Soares M., Saraiva J., et al. Visual phenotype in Williams-Beuren syndrome challenges magnocellular theories explaining human neurodevelopmental visual cortical disorders. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2007, 117:3720-3729.
13. Coles M.G.H. Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology 1989, 26:251-269.
14. Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1975, 39:131-143.
15. Dean A.F. The relationship between response amplitude and contrast for the cat striate cortical neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology 1981, 318:413-427.
16. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
17. Duffy C.J., Wurtz R.H. Response of monkey MST neurons to optic flow stimuli with shifted centers of motion. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:5192-5208.
18. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 2007, 14:456-467.
19. Handel B., Lutzenberger W., Their P., Haarmeier T. Opposite dependencies on visual motion coherence in human area MT+ and early visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:1542-1549.
20. Heeger D.J., Boynton G.M., Demb J.B., Seidemann E., Newsome W.T. Motion opponency in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19:7162-7174.
21. Hillyard S.A., Kutas M. Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annual Review of Psychology 1983, 34:33-61.
22. Hillyard S.A., Picton T.W. Electrophysiology of cognition. Handbook of physiology: Sec. 1. The nervous system: Vol. 5: Higher functions of the brain, Part 2 1987, 519-584. Waverly Press, Bethesda, MD. F. Plum (Ed.).
23. Hoffman M., Dorn T.J., Bach M. Time course of motion adaptation: Motion-onset evoked potentials and subjective estimates. Vision Research 1999, 39:437-444.
24. Huxlin K.R., Martin T., Kelly K., Riley M., Friedman D.I., Burgin W.S., Hayhoe M. Perceptual relearning of complex visual motion after V1 damage in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:3981-3991.
25. Kuba M., Kremláček J., Kubová Z. Cognitive evoked potentials related to visual perception of motion in human subjects. Physiological Research 1998, 47:265-270.
26. Kuba M., Kubová Z., Kremláček J., Langrová J. Motion-onset VEPs: Characteristics, methods, and diagnostic use. Vision Research 2007, 47:189-202.
27. Kubová Z., Kuba M., Spekreijsi H., Blakemore C. Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vision Research 1995, 35:197-205.
28. Lu Z.-L., Sperling G. The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Research 1995, 35:2697-2722.
29. Luce R.D. Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
30. Makeig S., Debener S., Onton J., Delorme A. Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Science 2004, 8:204-210.
31. Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 4:1057-1074.
32. Maruyama K., Kaneoke Y., Watanabe K., Kakigi R. Human cortical responses to coherent and incoherent motion as measured by magnetoencephalography. Neuroscience Research 2002, 44:195-205.
33. Maunsell J.H.R. Physiological evidence for two visual subsystems. Matters of intelligence 1987, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland. L.M. Vaina (Ed.).
34. McKeefry D.J., Watson J.D.G., Frackowiak R.S.J., Fong K., Zeki S. The activity in human areas V1/V2, V3, and V5 during the perception of coherent and incoherent motion. Neuroimage 1997, 5:1-12.
35. Mendes M., Silva F., Simões L., Jorge M., Saraiva J., Castelo-Branco M. Visual magnocellular and structure from motion perceptual deficits in a neurodevelopmental model of dorsal stream function. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25:788-798.
36. Miller J., Hackley S.A. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:195-209.
37. Miller J., Ulrich R., Rinkenauer G. Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1454-1471.
38. Muckli L., Singer W., Zanella F.E., Goebel R. Integration of multiple motion vectors over space: An fMRI study of transparent motion perception. Neuroimage 2002, 16:843-856.
39. Müller R., Göpfert E., Hartwig M. The effect of movement adaptation on human cortical potentials evoked by pattern movement. Acta Neurobiologia Experimentalis 1986, 46:293-301.
40. Müller-Gethman H., Rinkenauer G., Stahl J., Ulrich R. Preparation of response force and movement direction: Onset effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:507-514.
41. Näätänen R., Gaillard A., Mäntysalo S. Early selective attention reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica 1978, 42:313-329.
42. Newsome W.T., Paré E.B. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience 1988, 8:2201-2211.
43. Osman A., Moore C.M. The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:1-21.
44. Pasternak T., Merigan W.H. Motion perception following lesions of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. Cerebral Cortex 1994, 4:247-259.
45. Patzwahl D.R., Zanker J.M. Mechanisms of human motion perception: Combining evidence from evoked potentials, behavioural performance and computational modelling. European Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 12:273-282.
46. Philiastides M.G., Ratcliff R., Sajda P. Neural representation of task difficulty and decision making during perceptual categorization: A timing diagram. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:8965-8975.
47. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1992, 9:456-479.
48. Probst T., Plendl H., Paulus W., Wist E.R., Scherg M. Identification of the visual motion area (area V5) in the human brain by dipole source analysis. Experimental Brain Research 1993, 93:345-351.
49. Raiguel S.E., Xiao D.-K., Marcar V.L., Organ G.A. Response latency of macaque area MT/V5 neurons and its relationship to stimulus parameters. Journal of Neurophysiology 1999, 82:1944-1956.
50. Ratcliff R. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 1978, 85:59-108.
51. Ratcliff R., Tuerlinkckx F. Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:438-481.
52. Rees G., Friston K., Koch C. A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:716-723.
53. Reichardt W. Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. Sensory communication, 1961, Wiley, New York. W.A. Rosenblith (Ed.).
54. Ritter W., Vaughan H.G., Costa L.D. Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: A study of short-term changes in averaged evoked responses. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1968, 25:550-556.
55. Rudolph K., Pasternak T. Transient and permanent deficits in motion perception after lesions of the cortical areas MT and MST in the macaque monkey. Cerebral Cortex 1999, 9:90-100.
56. Schmolesky M.T., Wang Y., Hanes D.P., Thompson K.G., Leutgeb S., Schall J.D., et al. Signal timing across the macaque visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 79:3272-3278.
57. Schweickert R. Critical-path scheduling of mental processes in a dual task. Science 1980, 209:704-706.
58. Sclar G., Maunsell J.H., Lennie P. Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Research 1990, 30:1-10.
59. van Santen J.P.H., Sperling G. Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1984, 1:451-473.
60. Wagenmakers E.-J., van der Maas H.L.J., Grasman R.P.P.P. An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007, 14:3-22.
61. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge V.J., McCallum W.C., Winter A.L. Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964, 203:380-384.
62. Watamaniuk S.N., Sekuler R. Temporal and spatial integration in dynamic random dot stimuli. Vision Research 1992, 32:2341-2347.