Blowing against the wind-An exploratory application of actor network theory to the analysis of local controversies and participation processes in wind energy

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 6746-6754

  Jolivet, Eric ^a   Heiskanen, Eva ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; Controversy; Wind power

Indexed keywords

ACTOR NETWORK THEORY; ALBI; CONTROVERSY; NEW APPROACHES; SOCIAL DYNAMICS; SOCIAL RELATIONS; WIND ENERGY; WIND FARM; WIND POWER PROJECTS;

CIRCUIT THEORY; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; INFORMATION THEORY; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE;

WIND POWER;

ACTOR NETWORK THEORY; ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ENERGY PLANNING; PLANNING PROCESS; PLANNING THEORY; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SITE INVESTIGATION; WIND FARM; WIND POWER;

FRANCE;

EID: 77957314310     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.044     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 1969, 35:216-224.
2. Bergek A. Levelling the playing field? The influence of national wind power planning instruments on conflicts of interest in a Swedish county. Energy Policy 2010, 38:2357-2369.
3. Breukers S., Wolsink M. Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: an international comparison. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2737-2750.
4. Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph 32 1986, 196-233. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. J. Law (Ed.).
5. Callon M. An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. The Laws of the Markets 1998, 244-269. Blackwell, Oxford. M. Callon (Ed.).
6. Callon M., Lascoume P., Barthe Y. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy 2009, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
7. Cowell R. Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning-the construction of 'acceptable locations' in Wales. Land Use Planning 2010, 26:222-232.
8. de Fora, J., Jolivet, E., 2007. Cap Eole wind project. (Create Acceptance research project report). Available online at (referenced January 21, 2009). http://www.createacceptance.net/fileadmin/create-acceptance/user/docs/CASE_12.pdf.
9. Devine-Wright P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 2004, 8:125-139.
10. Ek K. Public and private attitudes toward 'green electricity': the case of Swedish wind power. Energy Policy 2005, 33:1677-1689.
11. Eltham D.C., Harrison G.P., Allen S.J. Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: implications for planning. Energy Policy 2008, 36:23-33.
12. Enzenberger N., Fichtner W., Rentz.O. Evolution of local citizen participation schemes in the German wind market. International Journal of Energy Issues 2003, 20:191-207.
13. Garud R., Karnøe P. Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 2003, 32(2):277-300.
14. Geels F.W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multilevel perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 2002, 31:1257-1274.
15. Jacobsson S., Lauber V. The politics and policy of energy system transformation-explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 2006, 34:256-276.
16. Jobert A., Laborgne P., Mimler S. Local acceptance of wind energy: factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2751-2760.
17. Jolivet, E., 2006. EOLE 2005 wind energy programme. (Create Acceptance research project report). Available online at (referenced January 21, 2009). http://www.createacceptance.net/fileadmin/create-acceptance/user/docs/CASE_12.pdf.
18. Kamp L.M., Smits R.E.H.M., Andriesse C.D. Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark. Energy Policy 2004, 32:1625-1637.
19. Khan J. Local Politics of Renewable Energy: Project Planning, Siting Conflicts and Citizen Participation 2004, Department of Evironmental and Energy Systems Studies, Lund university, Lund.
20. Latham A. Retheorizing the scale of globalisation: topologies, actor-networks, and cosmopolitanism. Geographies of Power: Placing Scale 2002, 115-144. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford. A. Herod, M.W. Wright (Eds.).
21. Latour B. Technology is Society Made Durable. A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination 1991, 103-131. Routledge, London. J. Law (Ed.).
22. Latour B. Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artefacts. Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change 1992, 225-258. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. W. Bijker, J. Law (Eds.).
23. Law J. On the methods of long-distance control: vessels, navigation and the portuguese route to India. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph 1986, vol. 32:234-263. Routledge, Henley.
24. Levi-Strauss C. The Savage Mind 1968, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
25. Mol A., Law J. Regions, networks and fluids: anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science 1994, 24:641-671.
26. McClymont K., O'Hare P. "We're not NIMBYs!" Contrasting local protest groups with idealised conceptions of sustainable communities. Local Environment 2008, 13:321-335.
27. McLarern Loring J. Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: factors influencing project success. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2648-2660.
28. Nadaï A. "Planning", "siting" and the local acceptance of wind power: some lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2715-2726.
29. Nadaï A., Labussière O. Birds, wind and the making of windpower landscapes in Aude, Southern France. Landscape Research 2010, 35(2):209-233.
30. Nadaï A., Labussière O. Wind power planning in France (Aveyron), from state regulation to local planning. Land Use Policy 2010, 26:744-754.
31. Reiche D., Bechberger M. Policy differences in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU Member States. Energy Policy 2004, 32:843-849.
32. Szarka J. Wind power, policy learning and paradigm change. Energy Policy 2006, 34:3041-3048.
33. Van der Horst D. NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2705-2714.
34. Van der Vleuten E., Raven R.P.J.M. Lock-in and change: distributed generation in Denmark in a long-term perspective. Energy Policy 2006, 34(18):3739-3748.
35. Verschuuren J. Public participation regarding the elaboration and approval of projects in the EU after the aarhus convention. Yearbook of European Environmental Law 2004, vol. 4:29-48. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. Wolsink M. Wind power and the NIMBY myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy 2000, 21:49-64.
37. Wolsink M. Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique of the persistence of the language of NIMBY. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2006, 31:85-91.
38. Wolsink M. Near-shore wind power-protected seascapes, environmentalists' attitudes and the technocratic planning perspective. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:195-203.
39. Wüstenhagen R., Wolsink M., Bürer M.J. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2683-2691.
40. Young R. Distance as a hybrid actor in rural economies. Journal of Rural Studies 2005, 22:253-266.