Modern imaging techniques for rectal cancer: Current situation and perspectives;Moderne Bildgebung beim Rektumkarzinom: Aktueller Stand und Perspektiven

Onkologe

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 741-746

  Juchems, M S ^a   Trnavac, S ^a  

^a Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Endoscopic ultrasound; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Rectal cancer

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISTANT METASTASIS; HUMAN; IMAGING; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROGNOSIS; RECTUM CANCER; REVIEW; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 77957307544     PISSN: 09478965     EISSN: 14330415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00761-010-1860-4     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF et al (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357:497-504
2. Bertz J, Hentschel S, HundsdÖrfer G et al (2004) Arbeitsgemeinschaft BevÖlkerungsbezogener Krebsregister in Deutschland 28-31
3. Carmody BJ, Otchy DP (2000) Learning curve of transrectal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 43:193-197
4. Dresen RC, Beets GL, Rutten HJ et al (2009) Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemoth erapy. Part I. Are we able to predict tumor confined to the rectal wall? Radiology 252:71-80
5. Dworak O (1989) Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas. Surg Endosc 3:96-99
6. Garcia-Aguilar J, Pollack J, Lee SH et al (2002) Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 45:10-15
7. Harewood GC (2005) Assessment of publication bias in the reporting of EUS performance in staging rectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 100:808-816
8. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Nelson H et al (2002) A prospective, blinded assessment of the impact of preoperative staging on the management of rectal cancer. Gastroenterology 123:24-32
9. Hunerbein M, Pegios W, Rau B et al (2000) Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Preliminary results. Surg Endosc 14:1005-1009
10. Juchems MS, Ernst AS, Kornmann M et al (2009) Value of MDCT in preoperative local staging of rectal cancer for predicting the necessity for neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Rofo 181:1168-1174
11. Kim CK, Kim SH, Choi D et al (2007) Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:853-859
12. Kim JC, Kim HC, Yu CS et al (2006) Efficacy of 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasonography compared with conventional ultrasonography and computed tomography in preoperative rectal cancer staging. Am J Surg 192:89-97
13. Kim NK, Kim MJ, Yun SH et al (1999) Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:770-775
14. Koh DM, Brown G, Temple L et al (2004) Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings - initial observations. Radiology 231:91-99
15. Kulinna C, Scheidler J, Strauss T et al (2004) Local staging of rectal cancer: assessment with double-contrast multislice computed tomography and transrectal ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:123-130
16. Lahaye MJ, Beets GL, Engelen SM et al (2009) Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Part II. What are the criteria to predict involved lymph nodes? Radiology 252:81-91
17. Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Nelemans PJ et al (2005) Imaging for predicting the risk factors - the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease - of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26:259-268
18. Lindmark GE, Kraaz WG, Elvin PA et al (1997) Rectal cancer: evaluation of staging with endosonography. Radiology 204:533-538
19. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) Routine use of transrectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma: results of a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 34:385-390
20. Poon FW, Mcdonald A, Anderson JH et al (2005) Accuracy of thin section magnetic resonance using phased-array pelvic coil in predicting the T-staging of rectal cancer. Eur J Radiol 53:256-262
21. Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Reddy JB et al (2008) How good is endoscopic ultrasound in differentiating various t stages of rectal cancer? Meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol
22. Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P et al (2004) Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg 240:1027-1034; discussion 1035-11026
23. Taylor A, Slater A, Mapstone N et al (2007) Staging rectal cancer: MRI compared to MDCT. Abdom Imaging 32:323-327
24. Thoeni RF, Moss AA, Schnyder P et al (1981) Detection and staging of primary rectal and rectosigmoid cancer by computed tomography. Radiology 141:135-138
25. Vliegen R, Dresen R, Beets G et al (2008) The accuracy of Multi-detector row CT for the assessment of tumor invasion of the mesorectal fascia in primary rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging
26. Ward J, Robinson PJ, Guthrie JA et al (2005) Liver metastases in candidates for hepatic resection: comparison of helical CT and gadolinium- and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 237:170-180
27. Will O, Purkayastha S, Chan C et al (2006) Diagnostic precision of nanoparticle-enhanced MRI for lymph-node metastases: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 7:52-60