Non-manipulable social welfare functions when preferences are fuzzy

Journal of Logic and Computation

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 503-515

  Perote Peña, Juan ^a   Piggins, Ashley ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Fuzzy preferences; Manipulation; Social welfare functions

Indexed keywords

BINARY RELATION; DECISION PROCEDURE; FUZZY BINARY RELATIONS; FUZZY PREFERENCES; MANIPULATION; SOCIAL CHOICE; SOCIAL CHOICE CORRESPONDENCES; SOCIAL WELFARE FUNCTIONS;

FUZZY SET THEORY;

THEOREM PROVING;

EID: 77957287402     PISSN: 0955792X     EISSN: 1465363X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/logcom/exn010     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. F. B.Abdelaziz, J. R. Figueira and O. Meddeb. On the manipulability of the fuzzy social choice functions, mimeo, 2006.
2. K. J. Arrow. Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York, 1951.
3. A. Banerjee. Fuzzy preferences and Arrow-type problems in social choice. Social Choice and Welfare, 11, 1994, 121-130.
4. S. Barberà.Anintroduction tostrategy-proof social choice functions.Social Choice andWelfare, 18, 2001, 619-653.
5. C. R. Barrett and P. K. Pattanaik. Fuzzy sets, preference and choice: some conceptual issues. Bulletin of Economic Research, 41, 1989, 229-253.
6. C. R. Barrett, P. K. Pattanaik and M. Salles. On the structure of fuzzy social welfare functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 19, 1986, 1-10.
7. A. Billot. Economic Theory of Fuzzy Equilibria. Springer, Berlin, 1995.
8. W. Bossert and T. Storcken. Strategy-proofness of social welfare functions: the use of the Kemeny distance between preference orderings. Social Choice and Welfare, 9, 1992, 345-360.
9. P. P. Côrte-Real. Fuzzy voters, crisp votes. International Game Theory Review, 9, 2007, 67-86.
10. M. Dasgupta and R. Deb. Transitivity and fuzzy preferences. Social Choice and Welfare, 13, 1996, 305-318.
11. M. Dasgupta and R. Deb. An impossibility theorem with fuzzy preferences. In Logic, Game Theory and Social Choice: Proceedings of the international conference, LGS '99, May 13-16, 1999, H. de Swart, ed. Tilburg University Press, 1999.
12. M. Dasgupta and R. Deb. Factoring fuzzy transitivity. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 2001, 489-502. (Pubitemid 32070575)
13. B. Dutta. Fuzzy preferences and social choice. Mathematical Social Sciences, 13, 1987, 215-229.
14. K. Dowding and M. van Hees. In praise of manipulation. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 2006, 1-15.
15. P. C. Fishburn. Comments on Hansson's 'Group preferences'. Econometrica, 38, 1970, 933-935.
16. J. L. García-Lapresta and B. Llamazares. Majority decisions based on difference of votes. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 35, 2001, 463-481. (Pubitemid 33619288)
17. A. F. Gibbard. Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result. Econometrica, 41, 1973, 587-601.
18. B. Leclerc. Efficient and binary consensus functions on transitively valued relations. Mathematical Social Sciences, 8, 1984, 45-61.
19. B. Leclerc. Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: a theoretic Arrow-like approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 43, 1991, 291-309.
20. B. Leclerc and B. Monjardet. Lattical theory of consensus. In Social choice, welfare and ethics, W. Barnett, H. Moulin, M. Salles and N. Schofield, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
21. P. K. Pattanaik. On the stability of sincere voting situations. Journal of Economic Theory, 6, 1973, 558-574.
22. J. Perote-Peña andA. Piggins. Strategy-proof fuzzy aggregation rules. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 43, 2007, 564-580.
23. G. Richardson. The structure of fuzzy preferences: social choice implications. Social Choice and Welfare, 15, 1998, 359-369. (Pubitemid 128663270)
24. M. Salles. Fuzzy utility. In: Handbook of Utility Theory, S. Barbera, P. J. Hammond and C. Seidl, eds., Vol.1: Principles. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998.
25. M. Satterthwaite. Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 1975, 187-217.
26. F.-F. Tang. Fuzzy preferences and social choice. Bulletin of Economic Research, 46, 1994, 263-269.