Biased feedback in spatial recall yields a violation of delta rule learning

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 581-588

  Lipinski, John ^a   Spencer, John P ^b   Samuelson, Larissa K ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECALL;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 77957285959     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.581     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Erlhagen, W., Bastian, A., Jancke, D., Riehle, A., & Schöner, G. (1999). The distribution of neuronal population activation (DPA) as a tool to study interaction and integration in cortical representations. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 94, 53-66.
2. Herzog, M. H., & Fahle, M. (1997). The role of feedback in learning a vernier discrimination task. Vision Research, 37, 2133-2141.
3. Herzog, M. H., & Fahle, M. (1999). Effects of biased feedback on learning and deciding in a vernier discrimination task. Vision Research, 39, 4232-4243.
4. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L., Corrigan, B., & Crawford, L. E. (2004). Spatial categories and the estimation of location. Cognition, 93, 75-97.
5. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352-376.
6. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220-241.
7. McLeod, P., Plunkett, K., & Rolls, E. T. (1998). Introduction to con-nectionist modelling of cognitive processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 3-8.
9. Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2009). Tests of the dynamic field theory and the spatial precision hypothesis: Capturing a qualitative developmental transition in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1698-1725.
10. Simmering, V. S., Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2008). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales. Brain Research, 1202, 68-86.
11. Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2002). Prototypes and particulars: Geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 16-37.
12. Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2003). Developmental continuity in the processes that underlie spatial recall. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 432-480.
13. Spencer, J. P., Perone, S., & Johnson, J. S. (2009). The dynamic field theory and embodied cognitive dynamics. In J. P. Spencer, M. S. Thomas, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a new grand theory of development? Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re- considered (pp. 86-118). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Tsodyks, M., & Gilbert, C. (2004). Neural networks and perceptual learning. Nature, 431, 775-781.
15. Wenderoth, P. (1994). The salience of vertical symmetry. Perception, 23, 221-236.