Assignment choice: Do students choose briefer assignments or finishing what they started?

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 143-151

  Hawthorn Embree, Meredith L ^a   Skinner, Christopher H ^a   Parkhurst, John ^a   O'Neil, Michael ^a   Conley, Elisha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b Monroe County Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

Assignment choice; Effort; Fluency development; Learning history; Partial assignment completion

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957259598     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020914     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Billington E.J., Skinner C.H., Cruchon N.M. Improving sixth-grade student's perceptions of high-effort assignments by assigning more work: Interaction of additive interspersal and assignment effort on assignment choice. Journal of School Psychology 2004, 42:477-490.
2. Billington E.J., Skinner C.H., Hutchins H., Malone J.C. Varying problem effort and choice: Using the interspersal technique to influence choice towards more effortful assignments. Journal of Behavioral Education 2004, 13:193-207.
3. Butterfield E.C. The interruption of tasks: Methodological, factual, and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin 1964, 62:309-322.
4. Cates G.L., Skinner C.H. Getting remedial mathematics students to prefer homework with 40% more problems? An investigation of the strength of the interspersal procedure. Psychology in the Schools 2000, 37:339-347.
5. Cates G.L., Skinner C.H., Watkins C.E., Rhymer K.N., McNeill B.S., McCurdy M. Effects of interspersing additional brief math problems on student performance and perception of math assignments: Getting students to prefer to do more work. Journal of Behavioral Education 1999, 9:177-193.
6. Cates G.L., Skinner C.H., Watson T.W., Meadows T.J., Weaver A., Jackson B. Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review 2003, 32:601-616.
7. Friman P.C., Poling A. Making life easier with effort: Basic findings and applied research on response effort. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1995, 28:583-590.
8. Greenwood C.R., Delquadri J., Hall R.V. Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. Behavior analysis in education 1984, 58-88. Merrill, Columbus, OH. W. Heward, T. Heron, D. Hill, J. Trap-Porter (Eds.).
9. Haring N.G., Eaton M.D. Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. The fourth R: Research in the classroom 1978, 23-40. Merrill, Columbus, OH. N.G. Haring, T.C. Lovitt, M.D. Eaton, C.L. Hansen (Eds.).
10. Hawthorn-Embree, M. L., Skinner, C. H., Parkhurst, J., & Conley, E. (2010). Assignment choice: The partial assignment completion effect. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. Ivarie J.J. Effects of proficiency rates on later performance of recall and writing behavior. Remedial and Special Education 1986, 7:25-30.
12. Joseph L.M., Nist L. Comparing the effects of unknown-known ratios on word reading learning versus learning rates. Journal of Behavioral Education 2006, 15:69-79.
13. Lentz F.E. On-task behavior, academic performance and classroom disruptions: Untangling the target selection problem in classroom interventions. School Psychology Review 1988, 17:243-257.
14. Logan P., Skinner C.H. Improving students' perceptions of a mathematics assignment by increasing problem completion rates: Is problem completion a reinforcing event. School Psychology Quarterly 1998, 13:322-331.
15. MacMillan D.L. Resumption of interrupted tasks by normal and educable mentally retarded subjects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 1969, 73:657-660.
16. Martens B.K., Houk J.L. The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1989, 51:17-27.
17. Martens B.K., Lochner D.G., Kelly S.Q. The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: A demonstration of matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1992, 25:143-151.
18. McCurdy M., Skinner C.H., Grantham K., Watson T.S., Hindman P.M. Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary student during mathematics seat-work by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review 2001, 30:23-32.
19. Neef N.A., Mace F.C., Shade D. Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: The interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1993, 26:37-52.
20. Neef N.A., Shade D., Miller M.S. Assessing the influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1994, 27:575-583.
21. Nist L., Joseph L.M. Effectiveness and efficiency of flashcard drill instructional methods on urban first graders' word recognition, acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. School Psychology Review 2008, 37:294-308.
22. Skinner C.H. Preventing academic skills deficits. Handbook of child behavior therapy: Ecological considerations in assessment, treatment, and evaluation 1998, 61-83. Plenum Press, New York. T.S. Watson, F. Gresham (Eds.).
23. Skinner C.H. An empirical analysis of interspersal research: Evidence, implications and applications of the discrete task completion hypothesis. Journal of School Psychology 2002, 40:347-368.
24. Skinner C.H. Theoretical and applied implications of precisely measuring learning rates. School Psychology Review 2008, 37:309-315.
25. Skinner, C. H., & McCleary, D. F. (in press). Academic engagement, time on task, and AAA responding. In A. Canter (Ed.), Helping children at home and school-III: Handouts from your school psychologist. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
26. Skinner C.H., Robinson S.L., Johns G.A., Logan P., Belfiore P.J. Applying Herrnstein's matching law to influence students' choice to complete difficult academic assignments. Journal of Experimental Education 1996, 65:5-17.