Precision livestock production: Tools and concepts;Precisão de produção de gado: Ferramentas e conceitos

Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia

Volumn 38, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages 123-132

  Laca, Emilio A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal behavior; Animal position; Plant animal interaction; Precision grazing

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 77957243464     PISSN: 15163598     EISSN: 18069290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982009001300014     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY. [2008]. The Canadian cattle identification program. Disponível em: Acesso em: 4/5/2009.
2. AGOURIDIS, C.T.; STOMBAUGH, T.S.; WORKMAN, S.R. et al. Suitability of a GPS collar for grazing studies. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineering, v.47, n.4, p.1321-1329, 2004.
3. ANDERSON, D.M. Virtual fencing - past, present and future. Rangeland Journal, v.29, n.1, p.65-78, 2007.
4. BAYMANN, U.; LANGBEIN, J.; SIEBERT, K. et al. Cognitive enrichment in form animals - the impact of social rank and social environment on learning behaviour of dwarf goats. Berliner Und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift, v.120, n.3-4, p.89-97, 2007.
5. BEWLEY, J.M.; EINSTEIN, M.E.; GROTT, M.W. et al. Comparison of reticular and rectal core body temperatures in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, v.91, n.12, p.4661-4672, 2008.
6. BISHOP-HURLEY, G.J.; SWAIN, D.L.; ANDERSON, D.M. et al. Virtual fencing applications: implementing and testing an automated cattle control system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.56, n.1, p.14-22, 2007.
7. BROSH, A.; HENKIN, Z.; UNGAR, E.D. et al. Energy cost of cows' grazing activity: use of the heart rate method and the Global Positioning System for direct field estimation. Journal of Animal Science, v.84. n.7, p.1951-1967, 2006.
8. BUERKERT, A.; SCHLECHT, E. Performance of three GPS collars to monitor goats' grazing itineraries on mountain pastures. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.65, n.1, p.85-92, 2009.
9. BURRITT, E.A.; PROVENZA, F.D. Effect of an unfamiliar location on the consumption of novel and familiar foods by sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.54, n.4, p.317-325, 1997.
10. BUTLER, Z.; CORKE, P.; PETERSON, R. et al. From robots to animals: virtual fences for controlling cattle. International Journal of Robotics Research , v.25, n.5-6, p.485-508, 2006.
11. CHAMPION, R.A.; RUTTER, S.M.; PENNING, P.D. An automatic system to monitor lying, standing and walking behaviour of grazing animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.54, n.4, p.291-305, 1997.
12. CHARMLEY, E.; GOWAN, T.L.; DUYNISVELD, J.L. Development of a remote method for the recording of cattle weights under field conditions. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, v.46. n.6-7, p.831-835, 2006.
13. CLARK, P.E.; JOHNSON, D.E.; KNIEP, M.A. et al. An advanced, low-cost, GPS-Based animal tracking system. Rangeland Ecology & Management, v.59, n.3, p.334-340, 2006.
14. DISTEL, R.A.; PROVENZA, F.D. Experience early in life affects voluntary intake of blackbrush by goats. Journal of Chemical Ecolology, v.17, n.2, p.431-450, 1991.
15. DU TOIT, J.T.; PROVENZA, F.D.; NASTIS, A. Conditioned taste aversions: how sick must a ruminant get before it learns about toxicity in foods? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.30, p.35-46, 1991.
16. DUTOIT, J.T.; PROVENZA, F.D.; NASTIS, A. Conditioned taste-aversions - how sick must a ruminant get before it learns about toxicity in foods. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.30, n.1-2, p.35-46, 1991.
17. EDWARDS, G.R.; NEWMAN, J.A.; PARSONS, A.J. et al. The use of spatial memory by grazing animals to locate food patches in spatially heterogeneous environments: an example with sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.50, n.2, p.147-160, 1996.
18. EIGENBERG, R.A.; BROWN-BRANDL, T.M.; NIENABER, J.A. Sensors for dynamic physiological measurements. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.62, n.1, p.41-47, 2008.
19. FELMER, R.; CHAVEZ, R.; CATRILEO, A. et al. Current and emergent technologies for animal identification and their use in animal traceability. Archivos De Medicina Veterinaria, v.38, n.3, p.197-206, 2006.
20. FIRK, R.; STAMER, E.; JUNGE, W. et al. Automation of oestrus detection in dairy cows: a review. Livestock Production Science, v.75, n.3, p.219-232, 2002.
21. FROST, A.R.; SCHOFIELD, C.P.; BEAULAH, S.A. et al. A review of livestock monitoring and the need for integrated systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture , v.17, n.2, p.139-159, 1997.
22. GALLI, J.R.; CANGIANO, C.A.; DEMMENT, M.W. et al. Acoustic monitoring of chewing and intake of fresh and dry forages in steers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.128, n.1-2, p.14-30, 2006.
23. GINANE, C.; DUMONT, B. Generalization of conditioned food aversions in grazing sheep and its implications for food categorization. Behavioural Processes, v.73, n.2, p.178-186, 2006.
24. GINNETT, T.F.; DEMMENT, M.W. Sex differences in giraffe foraging behavior at two spatial scales. Oecologia, v.110, n.2, p.291-300, 1997.
25. GONZALEZ, L.A.; TOLKAMP, B.J.; COFFEY, M.P. et al. Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science , v.91, n.3, p.1017-1028, 2008.
26. HALACHMI, I.; EDAN, Y.; MALTZ, E. et al. A real-time control system for individual dairy cow food intake. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.20, n.2, p.131-144, 1998.
27. HEWITSON, L.; DUMONT, B.; GORDON, I.J. Response of foraging sheep to variability in the spatial distribution of resources. Animal Behaviour, v.69, p.1069-1076, 2005.
28. KIMBALL, B.A.; PROVENZA, F.D.; BURRITT, E.A. Importance of alternative foods on the persistence of flavor aversions: implications for applied flavor avoidance learning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.76, n.3, p.249-258, 2002.
29. LACA, E.A. Spatial memory and food searching mechanisms of cattle. Journal of Range Management, v.51, n.4, p.370-378, 1998.
30. LACA, E.A.; ORTEGA, I.M. Integrating foraging mechanisms across spatial and temporal scales. In: INTERNATIONAL RANGELAND CONGRESS, 5., 1995, Salt Lake City. Proceddings... Salt Lake City: Society for Range Management, 1995. p.129-132.
31. LACA, E.A.; UNGAR, E.D.; DEMMENT, M.W. Mechanisms of handling time and intake rate of a large mammalian grazer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science , v.39, n.1, p.3-19, 1994.
32. LACA, E.A.; WALLISDEVRIES, M.F. Acoustic measurement of intake and grazing behaviour of cattle. Grass and Forage Science, v.55, n.2, p.97-104, 2000.
33. LANGBEIN, J.; NURNBERG, G.; PUPPE, B. et al. Self-controlled visual discrimination learning of group-housed dwarf goats (Capra hircus): behavioral strategies and effects of relocation on learning and memory. Journal of Comparative Psychology, v.120, n.1, p.58-66, 2006.
34. LANGBEIN, J.; SIEBERT, K.; NURNBERG, G. et al. Learning to learn during visual discrimination in group housed dwarf goats (Capra hircus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, v.121, n.4, p.447-456, 2007a.
35. LANGBEIN, J.; SIEBERTA, K.; NUERNBERG, G. et al. The impact of acoustical secondary reinforcement during shape discrimination learning of dwarf goats (Capra hircus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.103, n.1-2, p.35-44, 2007b.
36. LAUNCHBAUGH, K.L.; PROVENZA, F.D.; PFISTER, J.A. Herbivore response to anti-quality factors in forages. Journal of Range Management, v.54, n.4, p.431-440, 2001.
37. LAUNCHBAUGH, K.L.; PROVENZA, F.D.; WERKMEISTER, M.J. Overcoming food neophobia in domestic ruminants through addition of a familiar flavor and repeated exposure to novel foods. Applied Animal Behaviour Science , v.54, n.4, p.327-334, 1997.
38. MCCALL, C.A.; BURGIN, S.E. Equine utilization of secondary reinforcement during response extinction and acquisition. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.78, n.2-4, p.253-262, 2002.
39. MILONE, D.H.; RUFINER, H.L.; GALLI, J.R. et al. Computational method for segmentation and classification of ingestive sounds in sheep. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.65, n.2, p.228-237, 2009.
40. MOTTRAM, T. Automatic monitoring of the health and metabolic status of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science, v.48, n.3, p.209-217, 1997.
41. MYERS, K.P. Robust preference for a flavor paired with intragastric glucose acquired in a single trial. Appetite, v.48, n.1, p.123-127, 2007.
42. PASTELL, M.; HAUTALA, M.; POIKALAINEN, V. et al. Automatic observation of cow leg health using load sensors. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.62, n.1, p.48-53, 2008a.
43. PASTELL, M.; KUJALA, M.; AISLA, A.M. et al. Detecting cow's lameness using force sensors. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.64, n.1, p.34-38, 2008b.
44. PEIPER, U.M.; EDAN, Y.; DEVIR, S. et al. Automatic weighing of dairy-cows. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research , v.56, n.1, p.13-24, 1993.
45. PROVENZA, F.D. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food selection and intake in ruminants. Journal of Range Management, v.48, n.1, p.2-17, 1995.
46. PROVENZA, F.D. Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. Journal of Animal Science, v.74, p.2010-2020, 1996a.
47. PROVENZA, F.D. Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. Journal of Animal Science, v.74, n.8, p.2010-2020, 1996b.
48. PROVENZA, F.D.; LYNCH, J.J.; NOLAN, J.V. Food aversion conditioned in anesthetized sheep. Physiology & Behavior, v.55, n.3, p.429-432, 1994.
49. PROVENZA, F.D.; VILLALBA, J.J.; HASKELL, J. et al. The value to herbivores of plant physical and chemical diversity in time and space. Crop Science, v.47, n.1, p.382-398, 2007.
50. PUTFARKEN, D.; DENGLER, J.; LEHMANN, S. et al. Site use of grazing cattle and sheep in a large-scale pasture landscape: a GPS/GIS assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.111, n.1-2, p.54-67, 2008.
51. RALPHS, M.H.; PROVENZA, F.D.; WIEDMEIER, R.D. et al. Effects of Energy-Source and Food Flavor on Conditioned Preferences in Sheep. Journal of Animal Science, v.73, n.6, p.1651-1657, 1995.
52. RUTTER, S.M.; CHAMPION, R.A.; PENNING, P.D. An automatic system to record foraging behaviour in free-ranging ruminants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.54. n.2-3, p.185-195, 1997.
53. SCHELLBERG, J.; HILL, M.J.; GERHARDS, R. et al. Precision agriculture on grassland: applications, perspectives and constraints. European Journal of Agronomy, v.29, n.2-3, p.59-71, 2008.
54. SCHWAGER, M.; ANDERSON, D.M.; BUTLER, Z. et al. Robust classification of animal tracking data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.56, n.1, p.46-59, 2007.
55. SKINNER, B.F. Diagramming schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, v.1, n.1, p.67-68, 1958.
56. STADDON, J.E.R.; ETTINGER, R.H. Learning. An introduction to the principles of adaptive behavior. 1.ed. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1989.
57. STANFORD, K.; STITT, J.; KELLAR, J.A. et al. Traceability in cattle and small ruminants in Canada. Revue Scientifique Et Technique De L Office International Des Epizooties, v.20, n.2, p.510-522, 2001.
58. STEINFELD, H.; GERBER, P.; WASSERNAAR, T. et al. Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2006.
59. THORHALLSDOTTIR, A.G.; PROVENZA, F.D.; BALPH, D.F. Social influences on conditioned food aversions in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.25, p.45-50, 1990.
60. UETAKE, K.; KUDO, Y. Visual dominance over hearing in feed acquisition procedure of cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science , v.42, n.1, p.1-9, 1994.
61. UNGAR, E.D.; HENKIN, Z.; GUTMAN, M. et al. Inference of animal activity from GPS collar data on free-ranging cattle. Rangeland Ecology & Management, v.58, n.3, p.256-266, 2005.
62. UNGAR, E.D.; RUTTER, S.M. Classifying cattle jaw movements: comparing IGER behaviour recorder and acoustic techniques. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.98, n.1-2, p.11-27, 2006.
63. VILLALBA, J.J.; PROVENZA, F.D. Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administrations of sodium propionate. Journal of Animal Science , v.74, n.10, p.2362-2368, 1996.
64. VILLALBA, J.J.; PROVENZA, F.D. Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of acetate and propionate. Journal of Animal Science, v.75, n.11, p.2905-2914, 1997a.
65. VILLALBA, J.J.; PROVENZA, F.D. Preference for wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch. British Journal of Nutrition, v.77, n.2, p.287-297, 1997b.
66. VILLALBA, J.J.; PROVENZA, F.D. Nutrient-specific preferences by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch, casein, and water. Journal of Animal Science, v.77, n.2, p.378-387, 1999.
67. VILLALBA, J.J.; PROVENZA, F.D. Discriminating among novel foods: effects of energy provision on preferences of lambs for poor-quality foods. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.66, n.1-2, p.87-106, 2000a.
68. VILLALBA, J.J.; PROVENZA, F.D. Roles of novelty, generalization, and postingestive feedback in the recognition of foods by lambs. Journal of Animal Science, v.78, n.12, p.3060-3069, 2000b.
69. VILLALBA, J.J.; PROVENZA, F.D. Learning and dietary choice in herbivores. Rangeland Ecology & Management. In Press, 2009.
70. VILLALBA, J.J.; PROVENZA, F.D.; ROGOSIC, J. Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch administered at different times after straw ingestion. Journal of Animal Science, v.77, n.12, p.3185-3190, 1999.
71. VILLALBA, J.J.; PROVENZA, F.D.; SHAW, R. Sheep self-medicate when challenged with illness-inducing foods. Animal Behaviour, v.71, p.1131-1139, 2006.
72. WILLIAMS, J.L.; FRIEND, T.H.; NEVILL, C.H. et al. The efficacy of a secondary reinforcer (clicker) during acquisition and extinction of an operant task in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science , v.88, n.3-4, p.331-341, 2004.
73. WREDLE, E.; MUNKSGAARD, L.; SPORNDLY, E. Training cows to approach the milking unit in response to acoustic signals in an automatic milking system during the grazing season. Applied Animal Behaviour Science , v.101, n.1-2, p.27-39, 2006.